Melaka FC vs PDRM Tips and Predictions AH Lucky68

Liga Super Malaysia

Analysis More Tips

Melaka FC

PDRM

Further Reading

Onebetting Won 3/4

Heres a prediction and detailed analysis for the Melaka FC vs PDRM match in the Malaysia Super League (14 Jan 2026): Current Form & Statistics Recent League Form Melaka FC: Poor recent results currently on a four-match losing streak and just 1 win from 13 league games this season. PDRM: Also struggling on a nine-match winless run with just 1 win in 14 league games so far. Goals Scored / Conceded Melaka FC: scored 6 goals and conceded 33 this season (~0.46 scored; ~2.54 conceded per match). PDRM: scored 11 goals and conceded 41 (~0.79 scored; ~2.93 conceded per match). Both teams are struggling at both ends of the pitch poor attack and weak defense. Draw odds and models actually lean toward a stalemate, with 00 being a common prediction.

O/U
MAS SL Melaka FC 3-0 PDRM

More Tips

Saham VS Al-Khaboora I'm a well - known expert with long - term and stable information. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for my followers！ In the match between Al - United and Saham, there is an obvious difference in offensive efficiency between the two sides. Saham's offensive conversion rate is only 12%, lower than the league average of 15%. In contrast, Al - United shows stronger finishing ability with a conversion rate of 18%. In terms of xG efficiency, Al - United's key passing success rate is 82%, significantly higher than Saham's 75%. The value of forward passes (2.3 times per 90 minutes) is also ahead. In midfield control, Al - United's average ball - possession rate of 58% and counter - attack speed of 4.1 seconds per time dominate the game. The high - intensity sprint distance (112 km/h) is 12% more than Saham's. View and suggestion: Under Suggestion: Under 2.25 (Exclusive for big players) In terms of defense, Al - United averages more steals (14 times)

O/U
OMA PL Saham - Al-Khaboora
Al-Khaleej VS Al-Okhdood I'm a well - known and reliable expert, offering a long - term high - quality product tailored for fans！ In the recent 6 matches, Sehart Bay's offensive conversion rate is 42%, higher than Akodo's 28%. Its xG efficiency reaches 1.15 per game, and the key passing success rate is 61%, leading Akodo by 12 percentage points. The average value of forward - field passing is 0.78 times per 10 minutes. Sehart Bay's midfield control rate is 58%, suppressing Akodo's 42%. The transition speed is an average of 4.3 seconds, 0.8 seconds faster than Akodo. The total running distance in a full - game is 117 km, including 32 high - intensity sprints, 9 more than Akodo. View and suggestion: Over goals Suggestion: Over 2.75 goals (Exclusive for big bettors) On the defensive end, Al-Sehet Al-Gharbi has 19 tackles and 14 interceptions, 6 more tackles and 5 more interceptions than Al-Akhdoud. The clearance success rate of 82% is 7 percentage points higher than that of the opponent

O/U
SPL Al-Khaleej - Al-Okhdood
HJK Helsinki VS IFK Mariehamn I'm a well - known expert with long - term stable information. This is a set of high - quality long - term products tailored for my followers！ Helsinki's recent offensive conversion rate is 15.2%, lower than Mariehamn's 18.7%. Its xG efficiency is 0.82, slightly inferior to Mariehamn's 0.91. In terms of key pass success rate, Mariehamn's 62.4% is higher than Helsinki's 51.3%. The front - court passing value index is 2.3:1.7 in favor of Mariehamn. Regarding the midfield transition speed, Mariehamn can complete the attack - defense transition in an average of 8.2 seconds, faster than Helsinki's 9.5 seconds. Mariehamn runs an average of 108 km per game and has 214 high - intensity sprints, both leading the home team by more than 5%. View and suggestion: Away win Suggestion: Mariehamn +1.5 (Exclusive for big bettors) Mariehamn's full - time statistics of 14.6 tackles, 9.8 interceptions, and 12.3 clearances are all better than Helsinki's (12.1/7.9/10.5). Alth

AH
FIN LC HJK Helsinki - IFK Mariehamn

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Melaka FC VS PDRM