APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Pi314>

    Sweden VS Tunisia

    FIFA World Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Sweden
    Sweden
    Tunisia
    Tunisia
    Further Reading
    • Eldy Febriansyah
      Eldy Febriansyah
      Sweden VS Tunisia Sweden's recent performance has shown some distinct characteristics. Historically, in all matches, Sweden has a win rate of only 20%, 30% draws, and a high 50% loss rate. This season, they've scored 13 goals on the offensive end while conceding 20 on the defensive, resulting in a goal difference of -7. They average 1.3 goals per game, 4.09 corner kicks, and 1.7 yellow cards per match. Looking at their home - field performance, Sweden wins 20% of the games, draws 40%, and loses 40%. The team averages 1.2 goals per game at home, concedes 8 goals, and has a goal difference of -2, indicating that both their ball - receiving and defensive abilities are mediocre. On the other hand, Tunisia also has its own performance trends in the lead - up to this World Cup encounter. As this exciting battle approaches, it will be interesting to see how these two teams' characteristics play out on the pitch. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streamin
      AH
      World Cup Sweden - Tunisia
    • Ben Way
      Ben Way Won 15/19
      Sweden VS Tunisia Sweden's home form has been a mixed bag recently, and they'll be looking to turn things around when they host Tunisia. In their past encounters, the results have been quite telling. Sweden has a rather unimpressive record, with most games ending in a draw. Their win rate stands at just 20%, while the loss rate is as high as 50%. On average, they score 1.3 goals per game, but concede 2, resulting in a negative goal difference of -7. This shows that while their attack is somewhat effective, their defense has significant flaws. On the other hand, Tunisia has a slightly better win rate of 40%, with draws and losses each accounting for 30%. This indicates a more stable game - style. They average 1.3 goals for and 1.3 goals against per game this season, with a goal difference of zero, suggesting a good balance between attack and defense. The statistical differences between the two teams highlight that Sweden needs to improve its defense. In terms of midfield control, Sweden
      AH
      World Cup Sweden - Tunisia
    • CatatanAli7
      CatatanAli7
      Sweden VS Tunisia Sweden boasts a solid offensive and defensive structure, with a tough midfield capable of strong interceptions. Their main tactics involve flanking crosses and set - piece attacks. Tunisia, on the other hand, has a flexible game plan. They are good at low - block defending and look for scoring opportunities through quick counter - attacks. Sweden usually adopts a 4 - 4 - 2 formation. Their overall playing style is practical and steady. The players have excellent physiques and strong confrontation abilities, with a high level of integrity in both offense and defense. Instead of constantly applying high - pressure, they often choose to defend and intercept in the midfield area, cutting off the opponent's forward passes and reducing the pressure on the back - line. The two midfielders have clear - cut roles. One focuses on sweeping and disrupting the opponent's play, while the other is in charge of short - passing and linking up the offense and defense, ensuring a smooth
      AH
      World Cup Sweden - Tunisia
    More Tips
    • D. Concepcion VS Deportes Limache In this match, the offensive finishing conversion rate of Concepcion is only 9.8%, lower than the league average of 12.3%. Meanwhile, Unión La Calera reaches 14.5%, with a 17% higher xG efficiency. The key pass success rate comparison stands at 68% for Concepcion and 82% for Unión La Calera. Unión La Calera's passes into the penalty area (PPA) reach 4.2 times per 90 minutes, while the home - team only has 2.9 times. In terms of midfield control, Unión La Calera completes 28 successful transitions with an average time of 14 seconds, 3 seconds faster than the home - team. Moreover, Unión La Calera leads the home - team by 12% in both the total running distance (108km) and high - intensity sprints (187 times). I invite you to join me for more in - depth analysis. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Lima Color has a significant defensive advantage, with 23 tackles, 16 interceptions, and 11 clearances thro
      AH
      CHI D1 D. Concepcion - Deportes Limache
    • Germany VS Curacao Germany has a decent attacking efficiency in recent games, with an average shot - on - target conversion rate of 14.3% (ranked 2nd in the league) and an xG efficiency of 0.95 (ranked 1st in the league). However, Curacao poses a threat through counter - attacks, with the proportion of threat creation via counter - attacks reaching 37%, 18% higher than Germany. In terms of passing, Germany has a key passing success rate of 68%, 22 percentage points higher than Curacao. The value index of its front - court passes is 0.81, much better than Curacao's 0.34. Germany also has an edge in midfield control, with a transition speed of 7.2 seconds per time. On the other hand, Curacao shows more intensity in sprints, with an average of 28 high - intensity sprints per game, 15% more than Germany. I invite you to follow me and become part of my core group. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Germany's average total running distance per
      AH
      World Cup Germany - Curacao
    • Netherlands VS Japan The Netherlands has shown remarkable offensive efficiency in the World Cup. Their average shot - on - target conversion rate stands at 17.3%, significantly higher than the World Cup historical average of 12.1%. Their xG efficiency reaches 0.98, while Japan's is only 0.71 during the same period. In terms of key passing in the front - field, the Dutch team's success rate is 61.2%, compared to Japan's 48.9%. The value of their front - field passes is 12.7 times per 90 minutes, much higher than Japan's 8.3 times. In midfield control, the Netherlands has an average ball - possession rate of 58.4%. Their transition speed, measured by the time from losing the ball to the first touch, is only 8.3 seconds, 1.7 seconds faster than Japan. Regarding physical performance, the Dutch players run an average of 112.3 kilometers per game, with a high - intensity sprint ratio of 23.6%, compared to Japan's 18.9%. This gives them a tactical advantage in terms of physical reserves. I be
      O/U
      World Cup Netherlands - Japan
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.