APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Okiem Madridisty
251
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
62.9%
Win Rate
+19%
ROI
65
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
x4payFollow78.6%Win Rate +41.8%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
NajibbbbbxcFollow75%Win Rate +35.1%ROI 22Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
Uefa ChampionsFollow75%Win Rate +53.3%ROI 12Tips 1.97Avg Odds -
4
ต.เต้ย 🍀Follow73.3%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 15Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
OC TIPSTERFollow73.1%Win Rate +32%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
El CapitanFollow72.2%Win Rate +25.7%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
SUNYANI MAYOR🦉🎶Waterford United VS Shamrock Rovers Watford United has been in good form recently, showing significant advantages in various aspects compared to Shamrock Rovers. In terms of offensive efficiency, Watford United's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, much higher than Shamrock Rovers' 8.1%. Its xG efficiency is 0.89/xG, better than the opponent's 0.72/xG. When it comes to passing, Watford United's key pass success rate is 64%, while Shamrock Rovers only has 52%. The value of front - field passes of Watford United is 1.35, compared to 0.98 of the opponent, which reflects its organizational superiority. In midfield control, Watford United has a ball - possession rate of 57%. The conversion speed is 3.2 seconds, faster than Shamrock Rovers' 4.1 seconds. The running distance of Watford United is 108km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 32 times, both leading by more than 15%. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Shamrock Rovers has obvO/U
IRE PR
Waterford United
-
Shamrock Rovers
-
きら🐯⚾️🦁Waterford United VS Shamrock Rovers Shamrock Rovers have a strong edge in the historical head - to - head records against Waterford United. In the past ten meetings, Shamrock Rovers have 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses. Notably, when Waterford United hosts Shamrock Rovers, the home - team's performance is far from satisfactory. In four home matches against Shamrock Rovers, Waterford United has only 1 draw and 3 losses, conceding as many as 8 goals, with an average of 2 goals per game. This shows that their defense is under great pressure. The corner - kick statistics also expose Waterford United's offensive weakness. In the last four home games, the differences in corner kicks were - 9, - 5, - 11, and - 6 respectively. This indicates that the team has significant deficiencies in wing attacks and set - piece creation. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Shamrock Rovers has shown high efficiency and stability at both ends of the pitch during awaAHIRE PR
Waterford United
-
Shamrock Rovers
-
MTASHEWaterford United VS Shamrock Rovers Watford United is at the bottom of the relegation zone in the League of Ireland. After a change of coach, their home form has significantly improved. They've remained unbeaten at home recently, with their attacking line showing multiple goal - scoring threats. The big win in the last round boosted the team's morale. However, the team still has a very leaky defense, with a high average number of goals conceded per game. Their overall squad depth is thin, and they lack the ability to withstand pressure when facing top - tier teams. Shamrock Rovers, on the other hand, sits firmly at the top of the league. They've led the League of Ireland in both offensive and defensive statistics for a long time. Their away results alternate between wins and losses but remain stable overall. They have excellent control over defensive mistakes. In historical head - to - head matches, they've remained unbeaten against Watford United for many rounds. Their midfield passinO/UIRE PR
Waterford United
-
Shamrock Rovers
IRE PR
More Tips
-
Naftan Novopolock VS FC Baranovichi Baranovichi has shown greater stability in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate of 18.7% is higher than Naftan's 15.2%. Moreover, the xG efficiency value of 0.85 indicates that they create better - quality scoring opportunities compared to Naftan's 0.73. In terms of passing data, Baranovichi's key passing success rate of 82% is significantly better than Naftan's 74%. The value of forward - field passes, at 2.4 times per 90 minutes, suppresses Naftan's 1.8 times. Regarding midfield control, Baranovichi recovers the ball 14.3 times per game on average and initiates 11.6 counter - attacks. Their offensive - defensive conversion efficiency is 27% higher than Naftan's. In terms of physical fitness, Baranovichi's total team running distance exceeds 112 km, with 23 high - intensity sprints, leading Naftan by over 9% in both aspects. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.nO/U
BLR D1
Naftan Novopolock
-
FC Baranovichi
-
Ranheim IL VS Lyn Oslo Lanheims shows a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate is 12.8%, higher than Lian's 9.5%. The xG efficiency of 1.32 also indicates a better offensive quality compared to Lian's 0.98. In terms of key passing, Lanheims has a 78% success rate, while Lian only reaches 65%. This data gap shows that Lanheims' front - court organization is more penetrative. The value of front - court passes per game is 2.1 times for Lanheims, leading Lian's 1.6 times. Regarding midfield control, Lanheims has a 58% ball - possession rate and an average offensive transition time of 1.8 seconds. In contrast, Lian has a 42% ball - possession rate and a 2.5 - second counter - attack response time, which means Lanheims exerts more pressure. In terms of running data, Lanheims' total team runs an average of 112 kilometers per game with 195 high - intensity sprints, while Lian runs 105 kilometers and has 160 sprints, indicating that Lanheims has a phO/U
NOR AL
Ranheim IL
-
Lyn Oslo
-
St. Patricks Athletic VS Sligo Rovers St Patrick's has shown a stronger finishing ability this season. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.5%, higher than Sligo Rovers' 12.3%. Their xG efficiency (actual goals/xG) is 1.24. In terms of passing, Sligo Rovers has a better key - pass success rate of 62%, compared to St Patrick's 55%. However, Sligo's Passes into the Penalty Area (PPA) is only 0.87, lower than St Patrick's 1.12. St Patrick's also dominates in midfield control, with a 58% control rate, 9 percentage points higher than their opponents. Their transition speed (from losing the ball to the first touch) is an average of 12.3 seconds, faster than Sligo's 15.7 seconds. Both teams cover over 110km in a full - game run. But St Patrick's has 19 more high - intensity sprints (>18km/h), indicating a physical advantage. I believe in making well - considered recommendations for long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streamO/UIRE PR
St. Patricks Athletic
-
Sligo Rovers
BLR D1
NOR AL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X