Super Nova vs Jelgava Tips and Predictions O/U JJ BEDDINGS

Latvian Higher League

Analysis More Tips

Super Nova

Jelgava

Further Reading

Jose Brandao

Super Star has an average offensive finishing conversion rate of 14.3% this season, higher than Jelgava's 12.1%. However, the xG value of 1.21 per game compared to Jelgava's 1.35 per game indicates that its offensive efficiency may be inflated. Jelgava has a key - pass success rate of 78.4%, better than Super Star's 72.9%. The value of its forward passes is 0.33 per pass, leading Super Star's 0.28 per pass. In terms of midfield control, Jelgava has an average ball - possession rate of 60.3% and 13.8 offensive transitions per game, significantly outperforming Super Star's 48.6% ball - possession rate and 9.2 offensive transitions. Jelgava also leads in terms of running distance and high - intensity sprints. With an average running distance of 112.5 km and 192 high - intensity sprints per game, it is ahead by 5.6% and 8.4% respectively. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Super Star holds an edge in key offensive efficiency, as shown by data

O/U
LAT D1 Super Nova 0-0 Jelgava
Eldy Febriansyah

Super Star has been struggling at home this season. Their home win rate of 12.5% is the lowest in the league. In 8 home games, they've only managed 1 win, 2 draws, and 5 losses, scoring 9 goals while conceding 15, with a goal difference of -6. They have 5 points and sit in 9th place. In the last 6 rounds, they've hit a rough patch, with 1 win, 1 draw, and 4 losses. They've scored 4 goals and conceded 9, resulting in a goal difference of -5. Their win rate has dropped to 16.7%, and there's an urgent need to improve their offensive efficiency. On the other hand, Jelgava's away record isn't great, but they've shown signs of improvement. In 9 away games, they've got 1 win, 5 draws, and 3 losses, scoring 6 goals and conceding 15, with a goal difference of -9. Their win rate is 11.1%. In the last 6 rounds, they've had 1 win, 3 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 7 goals and conceding 10, with a goal difference of -3. Their win rate is 16.7%. The number of goals they conceded has decreased from 15 t

AH
LAT D1 Super Nova 0-0 Jelgava
BET ENSURED Won 5/6

Super Nova Stats In the last games, Super Nova has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 20%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 60% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 20% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 50% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Super Nova scores 1 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 20% of the games, and the team scored in 60% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 10% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 50% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 10% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 30%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 30% of the games, 3 goals in 40% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 10% of the games. FS Jelgava Stats In their recent games, FS Jelgava has demonstrated varied pe

AH
LAT D1 Super Nova 0-0 Jelgava

More Tips

Curacao VS Ivory Coast Curacao has been in good form recently. Their average conversion rate of on - target shots per game stands at 18.5%, which is higher than Cote d'Ivoire's 12.3%. The xG efficiency of Curacao reaches 1.25, 0.37 higher than that of their opponents. In terms of offensive organization, Curacao also shows clear advantages. Their key pass success rate is 68%, compared to Cote d'Ivoire's 49%, and the value of forward - field passes is 0.87, while Cote d'Ivoire's is only 0.51. In midfield control, Curacao's short - pass advancement speed is 82%, 17 percentage points higher than Cote d'Ivoire's 65%. The success rate of their transition attacks is 12 percentage points higher. Moreover, Curacao leads in terms of total running distance and high - intensity sprints. Their total running distance in a game is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 147 times, both more than 15% higher than Cote d'Ivoire. I'm good at analyzing unique issues and rare data to provide

AH
World Cup Curacao - Ivory Coast
Ecuador VS Germany Germany has been in fine form recently. In their last five matches, the German team averaged 3.2 key passes per game with a success rate of 78%. In contrast, Ecuador managed only 1.5 key passes per game with a 62% success rate. In terms of the value of front - court passes, Germany's average value is 0.45xG per pass, 0.28 higher than that of Ecuador. When it comes to midfield control, Germany's transition speed is 5.3 seconds per possession, 1.1 seconds faster than Ecuador. In terms of running distance, Germany covers 112 km per 90 minutes, and the proportion of high - intensity sprints is 38%, both leading by more than 15% compared to Ecuador. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Germany's defensive performance has been outstanding. Their tackle success rate stands at 71% (compared to 56% in the first half), interception success rate is 68% (52% in the first

AH
World Cup Ecuador - Germany
Tunisia VS Netherlands The Netherlands has been in great form recently. In their last five matches, the average number of on - target shots per game is 4.8, which is 133% higher than Tunisia's 2.1. The xG efficiency of the Netherlands stands at 0.85, while Tunisia's is only 0.39. In terms of passing, the Netherlands also holds an edge. The success rate of key passes is 68% compared to Tunisia's 42%, and the value of forward passes is 1.21 versus 0.67. In the midfield, the Netherlands' ball - possession rate is 59%, and the transition speed is 3.2 times per 15 minutes, a 22% lead over Tunisia. I'm good at picking out unique issues and rare data. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming The Netherlands has shown remarkable superiority in various aspects compared to Tunisia. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of The Netherlands (112 km) is 9.3% more than that of Tunisia. The number of high - intensity sprints of The Nethe

AH
World Cup Tunisia - Netherlands

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Super Nova VS Jelgava