APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Max Statman | 𝐽𝑢𝑣𝑒.
484
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
52.6%
Win Rate
+3.4%
ROI
60
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Tyson I Malik - Go Bears ForeverFollow90.9%Win Rate +37.7%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
2
OC TIPSTERFollow80%Win Rate +43.2%ROI 22Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
Games_ Under_OverFollow78.6%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 17Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
Boris MoscosoWon 14/18Follow77.8%Win Rate +31.4%ROI 20Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
5
Maldini0000Follow75%Win Rate +34.2%ROI 17Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
werzarn.Won 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +49.9%ROI 16Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ONUKE IFEANYIYelgava has been in great form at home this season. In 10 home games with a record of 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses, their efficient attack in the last 6 games is particularly prominent. They've won 2, drawn 3 and lost 1, scoring 12 goals and conceding only 7. With an average of 2.0 goals per game, they've scored at least two goals in three consecutive home games. The team's offensive explosiveness and defensive stability have both improved. The home goal difference has changed from -8 at the start of the season to +5 in the last 6 games, showing a significant improvement in defensive efficiency. On the other hand, Grobina has been struggling away from home. In 9 away games, they've only managed 2 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses. They've scored only 6 goals away from home, and in the last 6 games, they've only scored 3. Their offensive efficiency is less than 0.5 goals per game. Moreover, they've conceded as many as 14 goals away, with an average of 1.56 goals conceded per game. This defensiO/U
LAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
-
Simon PhillipsYelgava has an edge in offensive conversion rate, with 12.3% compared to Grobina's 7.8%. However, their xG efficiency is only 0.78, lower than Grobina's 1.12, which reflects a gap in the quality of scoring opportunities. In terms of key passing, Yelgava has a success rate of 42%, higher than Grobina's 35%, indicating an advantage in front - court creativity. But the front - court passing value index of Yelgava is 0.89, lower than Grobina's 1.03, suggesting that Grobina is better at penetrating the dangerous areas. When it comes to midfield control, Yelgava dominates with a 54% ball - possession rate. Yet, their transition speed is 0.32 seconds per play, slower than Grobina's 0.28 seconds. This means they lose the advantage in quick counter - attacks. The total running distance of both teams in the whole game is the same, about 109 km. But Yelgava has 32 high - intensity sprints, 9 less than Grobina. This lack of physical stamina may affect their performance in the final stages of the gO/ULAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
-
Seputar Real MadridIn a Latvian Higher League encounter, Jelgava will host Globiņa at Zemgale Olympic Centre Stadium. This game is crucial for Jelgava to solidify its position and aim for a higher standing, while Globiņa hopes to end its losing streak on the road and grab points for relegation survival. Based on the fundamentals and paper strength, Jelgava holds a certain home - field advantage. The team currently sits at 6th in the league. This season, they have a home record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, averaging 1.4 goals per game. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Yelgava is in an upward trend in home - offensive efficiency. The team is good at creating opportunities through wing breakthroughs and set - pieces, with an average of 5.3 corner kicks per home game. In addition, the midfield has an average of 12 interceptions per game, effectively restricting the opponent's ball - passing. However, Yelgava also has some serious problems. The team concedAHLAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
LAT D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X