APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Tyson I Malik - Go Bears ForeverFollow90.9%Win Rate +37.7%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
2
OC TIPSTERFollow80%Win Rate +43.2%ROI 22Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
Games_ Under_OverFollow78.6%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 17Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
Boris MoscosoWon 14/18Follow77.8%Win Rate +31.4%ROI 20Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
5
Maldini0000Follow75%Win Rate +34.2%ROI 17Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
werzarn.Won 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +49.9%ROI 16Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Seputar Real MadridIn a Latvian Higher League encounter, Jelgava will host Globiņa at Zemgale Olympic Centre Stadium. This game is crucial for Jelgava to solidify its position and aim for a higher standing, while Globiņa hopes to end its losing streak on the road and grab points for relegation survival. Based on the fundamentals and paper strength, Jelgava holds a certain home - field advantage. The team currently sits at 6th in the league. This season, they have a home record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, averaging 1.4 goals per game. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Yelgava is in an upward trend in home - offensive efficiency. The team is good at creating opportunities through wing breakthroughs and set - pieces, with an average of 5.3 corner kicks per home game. In addition, the midfield has an average of 12 interceptions per game, effectively restricting the opponent's ball - passing. However, Yelgava also has some serious problems. The team concedAH
LAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
-
Simon PhillipsYelgava has an edge in offensive conversion rate, with 12.3% compared to Grobina's 7.8%. However, their xG efficiency is only 0.78, lower than Grobina's 1.12, which reflects a gap in the quality of scoring opportunities. In terms of key passing, Yelgava has a success rate of 42%, higher than Grobina's 35%, indicating an advantage in front - court creativity. But the front - court passing value index of Yelgava is 0.89, lower than Grobina's 1.03, suggesting that Grobina is better at penetrating the dangerous areas. When it comes to midfield control, Yelgava dominates with a 54% ball - possession rate. Yet, their transition speed is 0.32 seconds per play, slower than Grobina's 0.28 seconds. This means they lose the advantage in quick counter - attacks. The total running distance of both teams in the whole game is the same, about 109 km. But Yelgava has 32 high - intensity sprints, 9 less than Grobina. This lack of physical stamina may affect their performance in the final stages of the gO/ULAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
-
Max Statman | 𝐽𝑢𝑣𝑒.The historical encounters between Jelgava and Grobina have been marked by a strong defensive character. In the five direct meetings since April 2025, three ended in draws. The last two matches - Jelgava's 0 - 1 home defeat and Grobina's 0 - 0 home draw - continued the low - scoring tactical trend. Statistics show that only one goal was scored in the last three meetings, and the average number of corner kicks per game was fixed at 3.3. This indicates that both teams have adopted highly cautious strategies in both attack and defense. Jelgava has shown excellent defensive performance at home this season, keeping clean sheets in the last three home games. However, its offensive efficiency has been quite volatile. When Jelgava defeated Grobina 2 - 0, the number of corner kicks reached 6, but in recent encounters, it dropped sharply to 3. This suggests that Grobina has significantly enhanced its tactical targeting. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streAHLAT D1
Jelgava
2-0 Grobina
LAT D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X