Austria (W) U19 vs Switzerland (W) U19 Tips and Predictions AH JJ BEDDINGS

European Women

Analysis More Tips

Austria (W) U19

Switzerland (W) U19

Further Reading

Light of your world 🔥

The Austrian U19 women's team is currently ranked 12th in the FIFA U19 women's rankings. With 3 points from the first two group - stage games, a win in this match will likely secure their spot in the next round. The team has an average age of 18.2 years and mainly adopts a wing - attacking tactic. On the other hand, the Swiss U19 women's team is ranked 15th in the FIFA U19 women's rankings. Having only 2 points from the first two group - stage games, they must strive to grab every point to keep their hopes of advancing alive. The team has an average age of 18.5 years and their tactical style leans towards a solid defensive - counterattack approach. This game will see the Austrian side aiming for victory to ensure their progression, while the Swiss team will be fighting tooth and nail for points. The difference in tactics between the Austrian's attacking style and the Swiss's defensive - counterattack could make for an interesting battle on the pitch. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cu

AH
UEFA-W U19 Austria (W) U19 0-0 Switzerland (W) U19
Reece Mccallum Won 15/20

Both Austria U19 Women's Team and Switzerland U19 Women's Team are mid - tier squads in European U19 women's football. Austria U19 Women's Team is currently ranked 12th in the FIFA U19 Women's Rankings. With 3 points from the first two group - stage matches, they are likely to secure a place in the next round if they win this game. The team, with an average age of 18.2 years, mainly adopts a flanking attack tactic. On the other hand, Switzerland U19 Women's Team, ranked 15th in the FIFA U19 Women's Rankings, has only 2 points from the first two group - stage games. They must strive for full points to keep their hopes of advancing alive. The squad, with an average age of 18.5 years, prefers a solid defensive - counterattack style. In this crucial group - stage match of the 2026 UEFA Women's U19 Championship, it will be an interesting battle between the flanking - attacking Austria and the defensive - counterattacking Switzerland. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & fre

O/U
UEFA-W U19 Austria (W) U19 0-0 Switzerland (W) U19

88
Stef Olivier K

Austria's U19 women's team has been in outstanding form recently. In the first round of Group B, they defeated Iceland 3-0 convincingly. They controlled the game well, boasting a 51% ball - possession rate. They had 16 shots in total, with 8 on target, and created 7 corner kicks. Goals were scored by Denise Luger, Ronja Ledler, and Tima Krasnig respectively. On the other hand, Switzerland's situation is a mixed bag. The exact score of their first - round match against Spain is not available yet. However, looking at their overall recent form, they have a significant problem with scoring in official games. In their last 10 matches across various competitions, Switzerland has only managed 3 wins, 1 draw, and 6 losses, conceding an average of 2.5 goals per game. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Austrian U19 women's football team has shown remarkable offensive efficiency in the Women's UEFA U19 League. In the last five matches, they've score

O/U
UEFA-W U19 Austria (W) U19 0-0 Switzerland (W) U19

More Tips

Tukums has shown a strong performance in recent matches. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, which is higher than Super Star's 12.3%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency of Tukums is 1.08 per game, compared to Super Star's 0.82. In terms of key passing success rate, Tukums leads with 64%, while Super Star only has 32%. Tukums also has 17.4 valuable forward passes per game on average, 5.2 more than Super Star. In midfield control, Tukums has a ball - possession rate of 58%. They can complete the transition from defense to attack in an average of 12 seconds, faster than Super Star's 16 seconds. Tukums covers 112 kilometers in a full - field run and has 38 high - intensity sprints per game on average, both of which are more than 10% better than Super Star. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Superstar has evident defensive flaws. They average

O/U
LAT D1 Tukums-2000 - Super Nova
Helsinki has been struggling in attack recently. In their last six matches, their offensive conversion rate is only 9.8%, which is lower than the league average of 12.3%. On the contrary, Elvis has achieved a conversion rate of 14.7%. The difference in xG efficiency is even more significant. The home - team, Helsinki, only creates 0.78 xG per 100 minutes, while the away - team, Elvis, reaches as high as 1.12 xG. In terms of key passing success rate, Elvis also has an edge. Their front - field passing value coefficient is 83%, 12 percentage points higher than Helsinki's. Moreover, their success rate of through - balls in the middle and front fields is 18% higher. I'm good at selecting matches with unique problems and rare data. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Elvis has shown a crushing advantage in midfield control. They average 17.3 fast - break attacks per game, 4.2 seconds faster than their opponents. Their total running distance per

AH
FIN CUP HJK Helsinki - Ilves Tampere
England shows a clear edge over Congo in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, England's conversion rate of 18.3% and xG efficiency of 1.12/xG are significantly higher than Congo's 9.7% and 0.61 respectively. In the attacking third, England also dominates. Their passing success rate in the attacking 30 - meter area stands at 74%, while Congo's is only 58%. The ratio of key passes is 28% for England compared to just 12% for Congo, creating a huge gap. In midfield control, England maintains an average possession rate of 62%. They are also quicker in ball - transition, with a speed of 0.8 seconds per transition, 0.3 seconds faster than Congo. Moreover, England's running distance of 109 km and 126 high - intensity sprints are both more than 25% higher than Congo's. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming England shows a stronger defensive performance compared to the Demo

O/U
World Cup England - Democratic Rep Congo

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Austria (W) U19 VS Switzerland (W) U19