Suwon FC vs Jeonnam Dragons Tips and Predictions AH Pi314

K League 2

Analysis More Tips

Suwon FC

Jeonnam Dragons

Further Reading

Hanan Mamuza

In the head - to - head history of the Korean K2 League, Suwon's home record against Chunam Dragons shows distinct patterns. In the last four direct encounters at home, Suwon drew three times and lost once. This string of results reveals Suwon's significant struggles at home against Chunam, finding it hard to secure a win and often getting caught in draw situations. It reflects a high - intensity stalemate in both teams' offensive and defensive rhythms. Notably, in these four home games, Suwon only had one loss, with the other three ending in draws. This highlights the resilience of their defense, but the lack of offensive breakthroughs has led to a consistently low win rate. The corner - kick data further confirms the tactical differences between the two sides. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming In the matches at Suwon's home ground, Chunam has consistently led in corner - kick creation, with an average lead of 4 - 6 corner kicks. Specif

O/U
KOR D2 Suwon FC 5-0 Jeonnam Dragons
Samuel Luckhurst

Water FC is in good form at home. Currently ranked 5th in the league, after 15 rounds, they have 7 wins, 5 draws, and 3 losses, accumulating 26 points. In 6 home games, they've achieved 3 wins and 3 draws without a loss. With a goalscoring record of 11:6 and a goal difference of 5, their home win - rate is 50.0%, indicating strong home - field dominance. In the recent 6 rounds, the team has 2 wins, 3 draws, and 1 loss, scoring 11 goals and conceding 8. Their attack remains potent, but the win - rate has dropped to 33.3%, suggesting some instability. On the other hand, Chun Nam Dragons are in a dire situation. They're at the bottom of the league, ranked 16th. After 15 rounds, they have only 1 win, 6 draws, and 8 losses, with just 9 points. Their relegation battle looks tough. Their away performance is extremely poor. In 11 away games, they've won only once, with 4 draws and 6 losses. The goalscoring is 13:19, with a goal difference of - 6, and the win - rate is a mere 9.1%. In the recen

O/U
KOR D2 Suwon FC 5-0 Jeonnam Dragons
ICEKHID

Water FC's offensive and defensive performance this season shows a distinct contrast in statistics. A 30% win rate and a 50% draw rate reflect the team's lack of stability in achieving offensive - defensive balance. With 18 goals scored and 14 conceded, resulting in a positive goal difference, and an average of 1.8 goals per game, it stands out as a strong offensive team in the K League 2. Notably, Water FC has only conceded 14 goals in 18 matches, with an average of 1.4 goals per game. This places its defensive quality among the top in the league, in direct contrast to Chunam Dragons. Additionally, the team's average of 5.7 corner kicks and 1.7 yellow cards per game demonstrates efficient execution during offensive - defensive transitions. On the other hand, Chunam Dragons are deeply troubled by offensive - defensive imbalance. A 0% win rate and a 40% loss rate expose the continuous challenges the team faces at the competitive level. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore

O/U
KOR D2 Suwon FC 5-0 Jeonnam Dragons

More Tips

VPS Vaasa has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency recently. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rate was only 6.2%, and the expected goals per shot (xG/shot) was as low as 0.08. This is far lower than Seinäjoki's 11.4% and 0.13 respectively. Seinäjoki has a high key - pass success rate of 78.6%, and the value of their forward passes reaches 1.92, significantly suppressing the opponent's defensive organization. In midfield control, Seinäjoki boasts a ball - possession rate of 61.3%. They average 487 passes per game, with a transition speed of 8.7 seconds per possession, posing a clear threat on fast - breaks. In terms of running statistics, Seinäjoki's average total running distance per game is 112.4 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 147, far exceeding VPS's 98.1 kilometers and 92 sprints. This shows their prominent advantages in physical fitness and defensive pressure. I invite you to join me for more insightful analysis. Visit N

O/U
FIN D1 Vaasa VPS - SJK Seinajoen
St. Patrick's has shown a stronger finishing ability compared to Waterford United. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly higher than Waterford United's 9.1%. The expected goals per shot (xG per shot) also favors St. Patrick's, with a 0.21 to 0.12 lead. In terms of passing, St. Patrick's has a remarkable key - pass success rate of 74%. The number of passes allowed per defensive action (PPDA) is only 8.5, effectively restricting Waterford United's ability to play out from the back. When it comes to midfield control, St. Patrick's enjoys an average ball - possession rate of 58%. Their counter - attack speed is 3.2 seconds per transition, faster than Waterford United's 4.1 seconds. Regarding physical performance, the total running distance of St. Patrick's is 116.3 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 78, both better than Waterford United's 109.2 km and 62 sprints. Overall, St. Patrick's seems to have an edge in multiple aspects of the game. Follow me

AH
IRE PR Waterford United - St. Patricks Athletic
In recent matches, Spain and Belgium have shown different offensive capabilities. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Spain has an average of 12.4 offensive terminations per game in the last five matches, scoring 1.8 goals with a conversion rate of 14.5%. Belgium, on the other hand, has 13.1 offensive terminations per game, scoring 1.6 goals with a conversion rate of 12.2%. Spain's expected goals efficiency (xG/offensive termination) is 0.13, higher than Belgium's 0.11, indicating better offensive termination choices. Regarding passing efficiency, Spain's key - pass success rate is 79%, and the value of forward - field passes (expected goals contribution per pass) is 0.042, which is better than Belgium's 73% and 0.038. This shows that Spain has stronger control in the midfield. I invite you to join and become part of our core group. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Spain has an expected goals (xG) per game of 2.01, while Belgium's is

O/U
World Cup Spain - Belgium

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Suwon FC VS Jeonnam Dragons