APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Mr. FutureGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks is merely 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja has shown better offensive performance. Their conversion rate reaches 14%, and the xG is 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also has an edge. The success rate of their key passes is 74%, higher than Gomel's 64%, and they've made significant contributions to the passing value in the front - field. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running statistics, Liepaja's whole team runs up to 110 km and has 40 high - intensity sprints, indicating a physical advantage that can support a full - game pressing. Overall, Liepaja seems to have more advantages in various aspects of the game, and it's likely that tO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Marc MscIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive situation is a key aspect to consider. Gomel has a rather low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is only 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel only manages 64%. Liepaja's passing in the front - field contributes significantly to their attack. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead. They have a 44% ball - possession rate, which helps them dominate the game's rhythm. They are also faster in ball - transition, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on Gomel. In addition, Liepaja shows an edge in running data. The whole team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage allows them to maintain pressure throughout the game. Overall, LiO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Jogo BonitoGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is merely 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. In contrast, Liepaja has a better offensive performance. They have a 14% conversion rate and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also leads. Their key passing success rate is 74%, while Gomel's is 64%. Liepaja's forward passes contribute significantly to the attack. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the game's rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Both Gomel and Levadia have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the bottom of the league. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rates wereO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X