APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Stef Olivier K
289
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
45.2%
Win Rate
-17.8%
ROI
35
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
freekbassBoth Gomel and Levadia Tallinn have had a poor offensive efficiency this season, ranking among the lower tiers in the league. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rates were 12.3% and 9.8% respectively, significantly lower than the Finnish Premier League average of 15.1%. In terms of key passing success rate, Gomel only achieved 61.4%, trailing Levadia Tallinn's 68.7%. The gap in the front - court passing value coefficient (0.81 for Gomel vs 1.03 for Levadia Tallinn) indicates a clear flaw in Gomel's offensive organization. Levadia Tallinn shows strong midfield control, boasting an average ball - possession rate of 62% and a passing success rate of 83% per game. However, the proportion of counter - attacks for both teams is less than 28%. The similar high - intensity running distances (108 km for Gomel and 105 km for Levadia Tallinn) suggest that the game is likely to have a steady pace. Overall, considering these factors, it's expected that the game will unfold in aAH
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Jogo BonitoGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is merely 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. In contrast, Liepaja has a better offensive performance. They have a 14% conversion rate and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also leads. Their key passing success rate is 74%, while Gomel's is 64%. Liepaja's forward passes contribute significantly to the attack. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the game's rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Both Gomel and Levadia have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the bottom of the league. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rates wereO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Smile KyelsGomel plays at home with a 4-3-3 high-pressing formation. Relying on the home atmosphere, they keep applying forward pressure. The double defensive midfielders solidify the middle for interception, cutting off the opponents' vertical passing lines from the backcourt. The full-backs frequently push forward to widen the offensive width. They combine inside cuts on the flanks with crosses from the byline for attacks. The tall players in the frontcourt compete for set-piece headers. Corners and free-kicks in the attacking third are their main scoring methods. After conceding a goal, Gomel quickly launches on-the-spot counter - attacks. The defense line stands relatively forward. When the full - backs push forward, there are gaps left behind for opponents to sprint through. The center - backs' speed in back - tracking and covering is insufficient. Gomel's long - term ball possession may lead to passing mistakes in the midfield. When facing a compact defense, their attacking rhythm slows dowO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X