APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
freekbassBoth Gomel and Levadia Tallinn have had a poor offensive efficiency this season, ranking among the lower tiers in the league. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rates were 12.3% and 9.8% respectively, significantly lower than the Finnish Premier League average of 15.1%. In terms of key passing success rate, Gomel only achieved 61.4%, trailing Levadia Tallinn's 68.7%. The gap in the front - court passing value coefficient (0.81 for Gomel vs 1.03 for Levadia Tallinn) indicates a clear flaw in Gomel's offensive organization. Levadia Tallinn shows strong midfield control, boasting an average ball - possession rate of 62% and a passing success rate of 83% per game. However, the proportion of counter - attacks for both teams is less than 28%. The similar high - intensity running distances (108 km for Gomel and 105 km for Levadia Tallinn) suggest that the game is likely to have a steady pace. Overall, considering these factors, it's expected that the game will unfold in aAH
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Marc MscIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive situation is a key aspect to consider. Gomel has a rather low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is only 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel only manages 64%. Liepaja's passing in the front - field contributes significantly to their attack. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead. They have a 44% ball - possession rate, which helps them dominate the game's rhythm. They are also faster in ball - transition, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on Gomel. In addition, Liepaja shows an edge in running data. The whole team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage allows them to maintain pressure throughout the game. Overall, LiO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Logan WinchesterGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at just 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better offensive state. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on the opponent. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km in a game and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical advantage enables them to maintain a full - game pressing strategy. Overall, Liepaja has more advantages in this match. Both Gomel and Liepaja have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the lower end of theO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X