APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
rewat.32@OfficiaIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive efficiency presents a clear contrast between the two teams. Gomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks stands at a mere 10%, and their xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position, with a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel's is only 64%. Liepaja's forward - field passes contribute significantly to the game. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead with a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress the opponent with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running data, the whole Liepaja team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Given these factors, LieO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Boki 2KGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is only 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Levengorod has shown better performance. Their conversion rate is 14%, and the xG is 1.2. In terms of passing, Levengorod leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. The team's forward passes have made significant contributions. In midfield control, Levengorod holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dictate the game's rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress the opponent with quick counter - attacks. Regarding running data, Levengorod's entire team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Overall, Levengorod seems to have the upper hand in this match. The absence of the core forward due to injury will directly affect the offensive output of the home team. This player haAHBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Angela MurphyBoth Gomel and Liepaja have below - average offensive efficiencies in the league this season. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rates were 12.3% and 9.8% respectively, significantly lower than the Finnish Premier League average of 15.1%. In terms of key passing success rates, Gomel only achieved 61.4%, trailing Liepaja's 68.7%. The difference in the front - court passing value coefficient, 0.81 for Gomel and 1.03 for Liepaja, indicates an obvious gap in Gomel's offensive organization. Liepaja's midfield control is evident from its average 62% ball - possession rate and 83% passing success rate per game. However, both teams have a counter - attack proportion of less than 28%. The similar high - intensity running distances, 108 km for Gomel and 105 km for Liepaja, suggest that the game's tempo will be relatively stable. Gomel has been struggling with low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks is only 10%, and the expected goals (xG) efficiencyAHBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X