APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Adin Reports>

    Arsenal Tula VS Tekstilshchik Ivanovo

    Russian National Football League
    Analysis More Tips
    Arsenal Tula
    Arsenal Tula
    Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    Further Reading
    • Gem John
      Gem John Won 6/7
      The team has shown some positive signs recently. They secured a 3-0 victory in the last encounter between the two sides, achieving consecutive wins in two rounds and keeping clean sheets in both victories. Looking at their overall performance in the past 10 matches, they've managed 4 wins, 1 draw, and 5 losses, which isn't outstanding. However, after ending a losing streak in the previous round, their form seems to be improving slightly. Currently, they are ranked sixth in the league table this season, having accumulated 20 points. In 13 league games so far, they've won 6, drawn 2, and lost 5, a fairly average performance overall. Defensively and in terms of counter - attacks, they haven't been at their best this season. They've scored 24 goals but conceded 22. When it comes to away games, they've only managed 2 wins, 1 draw, and 7 losses in their last 10 matches. The home team, Arsenal Tula, has a mediocre record in recent matches, winning 4, drawing 2, and losing 4 in the last 10 gam
      O/U
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    • Jack Pellegrini
      Jack Pellegrini
      Tula Arsenal finished 10th in the Russian First Division last season. In 34 games, they had 8 wins, 15 draws, and 11 losses, scoring 42 goals and conceding 44, with a goal difference of -2. From the statistics, the most prominent label for this team is "draw master" - the 15 draws accounted for nearly half of the schedule. With an average of 1.24 goals per game on the offensive end and 1.29 goals conceded per game on the defensive end, the overall rhythm of their games was not fast. During the off - season friendlies, Tula Arsenal's defensive issues were quite evident. They lost 1 - 2 to Volga Ulyanovsk, drew 1 - 1 with Kostroma Spartak, and had a 3 - 3 draw with Sochi. Especially in the 3 - 3 away game, conceding 3 goals in a single match, the focus of their defense was lacking. However, when playing at home, Tula Arsenal's offense was relatively reliable. Last season, they could score an average of... The team has a goal difference of -2. Statistically, its biggest label is being a "
      AH
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    • 343
      343
      Tula Arsenal has shown a stable performance at home in the Russian First Division this season. In their last five home games, they've had three wins, one draw, and one loss, averaging 1.6 goals scored and 1.0 goal conceded per game. This indicates a well - established offensive and defensive system. Notably, in their home games, they rely heavily on the set - piece and wing - breakthrough tactics. In the last three home games, the number of corner kicks has exceeded 7, with an average of 7.8 per game. In four of their home matches, the corner - kick count went beyond 8. Their corner - kick conversion rate (the ratio of goals resulting from corner kicks) against mid - and low - ranking teams at home this season stands at 18.5%, ranking among the top five in the Russian First Division. Defensively, Tula Arsenal has been impressive. In the last five home games, they've limited the number of goals conceded to 0.8 per game, showing a significant improvement in defensive coordination. On the
      O/U
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    More Tips
    • Ural has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, which is higher than Moscow Fish - Ray's 14.7%. In terms of xG efficiency, Ural records 1.83 times per game, while Moscow Fish - Ray only manages 1.61 times. When it comes to key passing success rates, Ural has an 82% success rate, outperforming Moscow Fish - Ray's 74%. The value of forward passes also reflects Ural's more accurate offensive organization, with 0.41 compared to 0.33 of their opponents. In midfield control, Ural holds a 62% ball - possession rate and conducts 14.3 counter - attacks per game. This is significantly faster than Moscow Fish - Ray's 11.9 times. Looking at the running data, Ural's players run an average of 118 km per game and have 2.4 high - intensity sprints, indicating an obvious physical advantage. Overall, based on these aspects, Ural seems to have a better chance in this match. Moscow Fish. Ray's defensive performance is lackluster, averag
      O/U
      RUS D1 Ural Sverdlovsk Oblast - Torpedo Moscow
    • Jägers Röda BK has been in excellent form recently. In their last four matches, their offensive conversion rate reached 18.3%, significantly higher than Hälmstad's 11.7%. Their xG efficiency is 0.21 higher per 90 minutes. In terms of offensive organization, Jägers Röda BK also shows clear advantages. Their key pass success rate is 76.4%, compared to Hälmstad's 68.1%. The front - field passing value index is 3.82, while Hälmstad's is only 2.91. In midfield control, Jägers Röda BK holds a 62.1% control rate. Their counter - attack conversion speed is 12.4 seconds, much faster than Hälmstad's 14.7 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Jägers Röda BK's running distance is 112.3 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 147, both leading Hälmstad by more than 10%. All these factors suggest that Jägers Röda BK has a strong edge in this game. Jongopojken shows a more solid performance on the defensive end. They average 8.9 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 11
      AH
      SWE D1 Djurgardens - Halmstads
    • In recent head - to - head matches, Berekoy has shown a clear edge over Keflavik. In terms of offensive conversion, Berekoy's offensive end conversion rate in the last 4 encounters is 23%, significantly higher than Keflavik's 14%. Berekoy also has an xG efficiency of 1.8 per game, outperforming Keflavik's 1.2 per game. When it comes to offensive organization, Berekoy's key pass success rate is 82%, and its forward - field passing value is 0.44, both better than Keflavik's 76% and 0.31 respectively. This indicates that Berekoy has a stronger ability to organize attacks. In midfield control, Berekoy runs an average of 112 km per game and has 19 high - intensity sprints, while Keflavik only runs 104 km and has 14 high - intensity sprints. On the defensive side, Berekoy has an average of 14 tackles and 11 interceptions per game, more pressing than Keflavik's 10 tackles and 8 interceptions. Overall, Berekoy seems to be in a more favorable position in this match. Breiðablik shows a strong e
      AH
      ICE PR Breidablik - Keflavik
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.