APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Ham-Kam VS Tromso IL

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Ham-Kam
    Ham-Kam 1
    4 Tromso IL
    Tromso IL
    Further Reading
    • YomiAICrypto
      YomiAICrypto
      Tromsø predominantly employs a well - rounded 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 formation. This tactical setup is both steady and practical, excelling in both offense and defense. It combines the ability to control the ball with a potent counter - attack, making it adaptable to any scenario and opponent in the Norwegian Premier League, standing as the most mature tactical system in the league. In the midfield, the team features a double - pivot setup. These midfielders are well - balanced in attack and defense. They can organize the team's ball - control through precise short passes and dictate the game's tempo. At the same time, they are capable of high - intensity midfield battles, disrupting the opponent's offensive and defensive transitions. Their midfield control is unparalleled in the league. On the offensive end, Tromsø has a diverse and multi - dimensional attacking style. They are proficient in various attacking methods such as wing breakthroughs and crosses, central penetration, and long - ran
      AH
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    • Itz Crossbow
      Itz Crossbow
      The battle for points in the Norwegian Premier League is heating up. A crucial encounter is on the horizon. Haugesund has shown a stable performance in recent league games. In their last ten matches, they've suffered only one defeat with frequent draws. Currently sitting in the sixth place, they're looking to close the gap with the league leaders, taking advantage of having one game in hand. On the other hand, Tromsø, as the league leader, holds a significant lead in points. But their recent form has been inconsistent. Two consecutive heavy defeats have exposed the frailty of their defense and a decline in offensive efficiency. Under the pressure of defending their title, their performance has become less predictable. From a tactical perspective, Tromsø's offensive system heavily relies on set - pieces and left - wing breakthroughs. However, they struggle to seize key opportunities, with a low finishing rate. Moreover, they have obvious weaknesses in through - ball tactics and defend
      AH
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    • Alexandre de Quadros
      Alexandre de Quadros
      The focus of the Norwegian Premier League is on a crucial encounter. In terms of recent form, the attacking - defending performances and home - away records of the two teams are in sharp contrast. Haugesund has shown a strong home record this season. In 6 home games, they've achieved 5 wins and 1 loss, scoring 12 goals while conceding only 7. Their goal difference is +5, and their winning rate is as high as 83.3%, ranking among the top home - teams. On the other hand, Tromsø, the league leader in the overall standings, has a relatively mediocre away record. In 5 away games, they've got 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss. They've scored 4 goals and conceded 7, with a goal difference of -3 and a winning rate of 40.0%. Although they lead the overall league standings with 28 points from 8 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses (a winning rate of 57.1%), their consistency away from home needs improvement. Haugesund, with 5 wins, 3 draws, and 3 losses, has 18 points and ranks 6th, with a winning rate of 45.5
      AH
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    More Tips
    • In this Romanian League encounter, Cluj holds a significant edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, compared to Galati's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.1 for Cluj, while Galati has 0.9. Passing analysis reveals that Cluj's key pass success rate is 78%. Their forward passes carry high value, creating four crucial goal - scoring opportunities. In midfield control, Cluj dominates with a 60% ball - possession rate. They can transition the ball quickly, with an average transition time of 7 seconds, effectively suppressing their opponents through fast counter - attacks. Running statistics also highlight Cluj's superiority. They cover a total distance of 118 km, with 210 high - intensity sprints, far outperforming Galati, which only covers 110 km and has 180 high - intensity sprints. This clearly shows Cluj's physical fitness advantage. I believe that by offering in - depth analysis, we can build long - term trust with you. In the defensive aspect, CFR Cluj h
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Otelul Galati - CFR Cluj
    • Viking has been in great form recently, showing clear advantages over Sandefjord in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Viking's average offensive conversion rate per game is 18.3%, higher than Sandefjord's 14.1%. Moreover, Viking's xG efficiency reaches 1.82, compared to Sandefjord's 1.44. Regarding passing, Viking has a 72% key - pass success rate, outperforming Sandefjord. The value of forward passes is 0.43 times per pass for Viking, while Sandefjord only has 0.31 times per pass. Viking's midfield control is outstanding. They have an average ball - possession rate of 62% and a passing success rate of 84%. Their transition - attack speed is 3.2 seconds per time, better than Sandefjord's 4.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the whole Viking team runs 112 km per game and has 213 high - intensity sprints, both exceeding Sandefjord's 106 km and 189 times. I believe that by providing careful analysis and recommendations, I can achieve long - term development. Vi
      AH
      NOR D1 Viking - Sandefjord
    • In the Romanian League, a detailed analysis reveals significant differences between the two sides. Let's start with the offensive efficiency. The University of Craiova has a remarkable offensive conversion rate of 24% (4 out of 20), with an xG efficiency of 1.2, showing they are highly effective at seizing opportunities. In contrast, Arad United has a lower offensive conversion rate of 14% (3 out of 20) and an xG efficiency of 0.8, indicating a lack of finishing ability. When it comes to passing efficiency, the University of Craiova has a key - passing success rate of 74% and a front - field passing value of 0.74, creating a significant threat. Arad's key - passing success rate is 64% with a front - field passing value of 0.6. In terms of midfield control, the winning side, the University of Craiova, has a midfield control rate of 48% and a transition speed of 2.1 seconds, allowing them to quickly advance and put pressure on the opponent. Looking at the running data, the total running
      O/U
      ROM D1 CS Universitatea Craiova - UTA Arad
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.