Vikingur Reykjavik vs Hapoel Beer Sheva Tips and Predictions O/U JJ BEDDINGS

UEFA Champions League

Analysis More Tips

Vikingur Reykjavik

Hapoel Beer Sheva

Further Reading

CryptoDude

Vikingur Reykjavik and Maccabi Be'er Sheva have shown comparable overall performance recently. Vikingur Reykjavik has won 7, drawn 1, and lost 2 in their last 10 matches. Meanwhile, Maccabi Be'er Sheva has a record of 4 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses in the same period. Looking at their head - to - head encounters, the two teams are evenly matched. Although Maccabi Be'er Sheva has an advantage in historical meetings, in their last encounter, there was a certain gap in performance between the two sides. Vikingur Reykjavik played quite well, and the team has been in hot form during their recent away trips. Based on the current data, the situation is rather balanced. Historically, Vikingur Reykjavik has been at a disadvantage in the past 10 meetings. It remains to be seen how well they can recover in this game. It's hard to predict which team will fully unleash their potential and secure the victory. Vikingur has been in good form lately, winning 7, drawing 1, and losing 2 in their last 10 m

AH
UEFA CL Vikingur Reykjavik - Hapoel Beer Sheva
Adijuntak888

Víkingur Reykjavik WWWWDL Víkingur Reykjavik will be hoping to bounce back here after a 2-1 Úrvalsdeild loss in their previous game against Þór Akureyri. The only name on the scoresheet from Víkingur Reykjavik was Dadi Berg Jónsson (90'). Ágúst Hlynsson (82') scored for Þór Akureyri. Matches featuring Víkingur Reykjavik have tended to be exciting affairs recently with plenty of scoring being a common characteristic. Over their past 6 clashes alone, the sum of 20 goals have been recorded for both sides combined (at an average of 3.33 goals per game) with 15 of these coming from Víkingur Reykjavik. That sort of pattern won’t necessarily be sustained into this match, however. Hapoel Be'er Sheva WWDWWL Since tasting defeat last time out to Maccabi Haifa in Ligat HaAl action, Hapoel Be'er Sheva will be hoping to turn things around here. The only scorer from Hapoel Be'er Sheva was Mohammad Kna'an (63'). Ethane Azoulay (24', 45')

AH
UEFA CL Vikingur Reykjavik - Hapoel Beer Sheva
Eldy Febriansyah

Vikingur has shown unparalleled dominance in the Icelandic Premier League. After 15 rounds, they have an outstanding record of 13 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, accumulating 40 points and sitting comfortably at the top of the table with an 86.7% win - rate. Their home form is near - perfect. In 7 home games, they've secured 6 wins and 1 draw without a single defeat. They've scored 24 goals while conceding only 5, with a remarkably low defensive goals - against rate of 0.71 goals per game. The home goal difference stands at a whopping 19. In their last 6 games, they've won 5 and lost 1, scoring 20 goals and conceding 6, averaging 3.3 goals scored and 1 goal conceded per match, indicating top - level offensive and defensive efficiency. On the other hand, Maccabi Be'er Sheva is also leading strongly in the Israeli Premier League. After 26 rounds, they have 18 wins, 5 draws, and 3 losses, amassing 59 points with a 69.2% win - rate. Their away form is solid. In 13 away games, they've won 9, draw

AH
UEFA CL Vikingur Reykjavik - Hapoel Beer Sheva

More Tips

Thun has been in great form recently. Their offensive conversion rate has risen to 18.3%, higher than Dinamo Zagreb's 15.1%. The xG efficiency of Thun reaches 1.28, while that of Dinamo Zagreb is only 1.05, indicating that Thun poses a greater threat in attack. In terms of key passes, Thun's success rate is 62.4%, better than Dinamo Zagreb's 54.9%, and the value of their forward passes is 12.7% higher. In midfield control, Thun has 3.2 more interceptions per game on average and their transition speed has increased by 15%. They also cover a distance of 118.6km during the game and have 41 high - intensity sprints, showing better physical fitness. On the defensive end, Thun's tackle success rate is 71.4%, leading the way. They also have 8 more clearances, which means their defense is more stable. In terms of offensive efficiency, Thun's conversion rate of scoring opportunities is 21.7%, higher than Dinamo Zagreb's 17.3%. The total xG of Thun is 2.45, significantly higher than Dinamo Zagre

O/U
UEFA CL Thun - Dinamo Zagreb
The Central University of Venezuela has been struggling in the attacking end recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at just 12%, lower than Santos' 18%. Moreover, their average expected goals (xG) per game is 0.65, trailing behind Santos' 0.92. In terms of key passing, both teams have a success rate of less than 45%, and the total value of forward passes is only 12.3 times, indicating poor offensive organization efficiency. When it comes to midfield control, the Central University of Venezuela has a 58% ball - possession rate, but their passing success rate is only 68%. Santos, with a 52% possession, has a faster conversion speed, completing an effective offensive pass every 23 seconds on average. Both teams have a total running distance of over 110 kilometers and 32 high - intensity sprints. However, their scoring opportunity conversion rate is less than 24%, resulting in a continuous lack of offensive power. On the defensive side, the two teams have similar tackle statistic

O/U
CON CSA Universidad Central de Venezuela - Santos
Blue Cross shows a significant edge over Puebla across multiple aspects of the game. In attack, Blue Cross has a conversion rate 12% higher than Puebla. The xG efficiency stands at 1.8 compared to Puebla's 1.2, indicating a more threatening offensive presence. The key pass success rate is 18% for Blue Cross and only 12% for Puebla, with a 0.7 lead in the value of forward - field passes. This suggests that Blue Cross can maintain a smoother ball - control rhythm. In the midfield, Blue Cross outperforms Puebla as well. The number of interceptions is 14 to 9, and the tackle success rate is 65% compared to 52%. These statistics imply that Blue Cross can achieve more efficient transitions between defense and offense. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Blue Cross is 112 km, far more than Puebla's 1.4 km. Blue Cross also has 3 more high - intensity sprints, showing better physical endurance. Overall, Blue Cross seems to be in a better position in this match based

O/U
MEX D1 CDSyC Cruz Azul - Puebla

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Vikingur Reykjavik VS Hapoel Beer Sheva