APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
GoalwireHQWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
LACOBRAAAFollow78.6%Win Rate +42.6%ROI 15Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
The french ladFollow75%Win Rate +49.6%ROI 16Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
4
ConstanceWon 5/6Follow75%Win Rate +18.8%ROI 12Tips 1.57Avg Odds -
5
Emile Smith RoweFollow74.1%Win Rate +32.3%ROI 27Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
AbuleWon 5/6Follow73.7%Win Rate +16.5%ROI 19Tips 1.62Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Alexandre de QuadrosThe historical encounter between Spartak Trnava and CSKA 1948 Sofia is quite telling. In a previous friendly match, despite having the home - field advantage, CSKA 1948 Sofia lost 0 - 1 to Spartak Trnava. In that game, the first half ended goalless with both teams failing to break the deadlock. However, in the second half, Spartak Trnava managed to change the score through a well - coordinated attack and eventually secured the victory. From a data perspective, Spartak Trnava demonstrated superior tactical discipline and better handling of crucial balls in that friendly. Their defense remained solid throughout the game, keeping a clean sheet. Moreover, their efficiency in converting shots into goals was significantly higher than that of their opponents. As they prepare for this upcoming UEFA Europa Conference League encounter where Spartak Trnava will play away against CSKA 1948 Sofia, the past result might give Spartak Trnava an edge in terms of confidence. CSKA 1948 Sofia, on the otheAH
UEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠Trenčín Spartak shows a better performance in various aspects compared to CSKA Sofia. In terms of offensive efficiency, Trenčín Spartak has a 18% conversion rate of full - field offensive finishes, which is superior to CSKA Sofia's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 indicates that Trenčín Spartak is more efficient in the offensive end. Regarding passing, Trenčín Spartak has a 62% success rate of key passes, leading CSKA Sofia's 48%. The value of front - field passes is 1.32 to 0.89, showing a more threatening attack. In midfield control, Trenčín Spartak has a 58% possession rate, ensuring a better rhythm of ball - playing. The average transition speed is 1.8 seconds, faster than CSKA Sofia's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Trenčín Spartak is 112 km, higher than CSKA Sofia's 98 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 times compared to 15 times, showing a physical advantage. On the defensive side, Trenčín Spartak hasAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
Liam 665 Won 4/5Trenčín Spartak shows better performance in various aspects compared to CSKA Sofia 1948. In terms of offensive efficiency, Trenčín Spartak has an overall offensive conversion rate of 18%, which is superior to CSKA Sofia 1948's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 indicates that Trenčín Spartak is more productive in the offensive end. Regarding passing, Trenčín Spartak has a key - pass success rate of 62%, leading CSKA Sofia 1948's 48%. The value of forward passes, 1.32 to 0.89, suggests that Trenčín Spartak's attacks are more threatening. In midfield control, Trenčín Spartak holds a 58% possession rate compared to CSKA Sofia 1948's 42%, which helps maintain a better passing rhythm. The average transition speed of 1.8 seconds is faster than the opponent's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Trenčín Spartak reaches 112 km, higher than CSKA Sofia 1948's 98 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 23 to 15, shows their physical adAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
UEFA ECL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X