Malisheva vs Hibernian Tips and Predictions AH Pi314

UEFA Conference League

Analysis More Tips

Malisheva

Hibernian

Further Reading

BET ENSURED Won 7/8

KF Malisheva Stats In the last games, KF Malisheva has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 70%, while their draw rate stands at 10%. On the other hand, they lost 20% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 50% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 20% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, KF Malisheva scores 3 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 30% of the games, and the team scored in 100% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 30% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 70% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 40% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 20% of the games, 2 goals in 10% of the games, 3 goals in 10% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 60% of the games. Hibernian Stats In their recent games, Hibernian has demonstrated varie

1x2
UEFA ECL Malisheva 2-0 Hibernian
MarkZ

Marisheva is expected to continue its proactive playing style. Head coach Bredarik clearly stated that "even in defense, we use attacking players, and the forwards are the first line of defense." The team focuses on high - intensity pressing and quick counter - attacks. In the first round of the European competition, the front - court core players Uka, Duraj, and Shabani all scored goals. Among them, Uka, with a market value of 250,000 euros, is a threatening attacking point in the team. On the other hand, due to the absence of several midfield mainstays, Hibernian's midfield control may be weakened. It is expected that head coach David Gray will adjust the formation, and new signing Wright is likely to get a chance to play. The Scottish team has a much higher overall market value than its opponent, and its players have an advantage in individual ability. However, playing away and facing a highly motivated opponent, how to deal with Marisheva's initial impact will be the key. Both team

O/U
UEFA ECL Malisheva 2-0 Hibernian
JJ BEDDINGS

Marisheva shows a better offensive efficiency compared to Hibernian. Its conversion rate of offensive finishes stands at 18.3%, superior to Hibernian's 12.7%, and the average xG efficiency is 0.45 higher. In terms of passing, Marisheva's key - pass success rate is 62%, leading Hibernian's 49%. The average value of its forward passes is 1.83, higher than 1.21 of Hibernian. Defensively in the midfield, Marisheva has 11 more interceptions, and the average transition speed is 1.2 seconds faster. The total running distance of the whole team reaches 118.6 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 23, both higher than Hibernian. On Hibernian's defensive side, although it has 14 tackles and 9 interceptions, the number of clearances is only 5, which casts doubt on the stability of its defense line. In the attacking aspect, Marisheva has a 29% shot - on - target rate, leading Hibernian. The conversion rate of scoring opportunities is 21%, better than Hibernian's 15%. The cumulative xG of

O/U
UEFA ECL Malisheva 2-0 Hibernian

More Tips

Travis Shapour has a better offensive conversion rate of 18.2% compared to Ludogorets' 12.4%. The xG efficiency is 0.78 for Travis Shapour and 0.41 for Ludogorets. The key pass success rate of the home - team Travis Shapour is 62%, leading the away - team Ludogorets' 51%. The value of forward passes is 1.32 for Travis Shapour, higher than 0.89 of Ludogorets. In the midfield, Travis Shapour has a 61% ball - possession rate against Ludogorets' 39%, and its transition speed is 1.2 seconds, faster than 1.8 seconds of Ludogorets. The whole team of Travis Shapour runs 112.3 km and has 47 high - intensity sprints, both of which are higher than those of Ludogorets. On the defensive end, Travis Shapour has 23 tackles, 15 interceptions, and 11 clearances, showing comprehensive advantages in data. In terms of offensive efficiency, Travis Shapour is better at seizing opportunities. The scoring chance conversion rate is 28% for Travis Shapour and 15% for Ludogorets. The xG comparison shows that Tra

AH
UEFA ECL Hapoel Tel Aviv - Ludogorets Razgrad
In this Europa Conference League encounter, Rijeka seems to hold a significant edge over Derry City. Rijeka's offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, which is notably better than Derry City's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 compared to 0.89 indicates that Rijeka poses a greater threat in the attacking third. In terms of the passing game, Rijeka's key - pass success rate of 62% against Derry City's 49% shows that their offensive organization is more fluid. The value of their forward passes, at 1.83 compared to 1.31, further emphasizes their superiority in the attacking build - up. When it comes to physicality and stamina, Rijeka outperforms Derry City. Their total team running distance of 118.3 km is 2.1 km more than Derry City's. The number of high - intensity sprints, 124 to 98, also reflects Rijeka's physical advantage. Although Derry City has 15 tackles, 11 interceptions and 8 clearances, Rijeka's midfield ball - possession rate of 58% and a quick transition speed of 1.7 seconds

O/U
UEFA ECL Rijeka - Derry City
In this Europa Cup encounter, Split Hajduk shows a clear edge over Pafos in multiple aspects. In recent matches, Split Hajduk's offensive conversion rate stands at 14.2%, higher than Pafos' 9.8%. Moreover, its expected goal efficiency (xG/attack completion) is 0.13 higher than Pafos', indicating a superior ability to finish attacks. In terms of key pass success rate, Hajduk reaches 78.6%, compared to Pafos' 69.4%. The value of Hajduk's forward passes is 23% higher. When it comes to midfield control, Hajduk has an average ball - possession rate of 58.3% per game. The number of fast - break conversions reaches 4.7 times per game, significantly better than Pafos' 2.9 times. Looking at the running data, Hajduk runs 118.4 kilometers per game on average, with 142 high - intensity sprints, leading Pafos by nearly 15% in both aspects. Join me to get more in - depth analysis of the game！ In terms of defensive performance, Pafos has slightly more tackles and interceptions. However, their clear

AH
UEFA EL Hajduk Split - Pafos FC

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Malisheva VS Hibernian