Philippines vs Myanmar Tips and Predictions AH LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍

ASEAN Championship

Analysis More Tips

Philippines

Myanmar

Further Reading

Tyler Durden

The Philippines has a consistent 4 - 3 - 3 tactical formation, centered around a three - dimensional offensive system driven by both flanks. A key tactical feature is the frequent forward runs and assists from the left - back. The combination of crosses from the flanks and through - balls in the channels is well - developed. In recent international matches, the team has an average of eleven flank attacks per game. The accurate cross - success rate from the flanks remains stable at 33%. This allows them to continuously pose threats in the opponent's penalty area, enriching their offensive options. As for Myanmar, they will need to be vigilant against the Philippines' well - rehearsed flank - based attacks. Defensively, they must focus on stopping the left - back's forward runs and deal with the crosses and through - balls effectively. Overall, the Philippines' tactical approach gives them an edge in creating goal - scoring opportunities. However, the outcome of the game also depends on

O/U
ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
Afc Xylo Marq

The Philippine team demonstrates strong dominance when playing at home. This season, their home - win rate is as high as 83.3%. In 10 home games, they scored 21 goals and only conceded 7, with a goal difference of 14. They averaged 3.5 goals per game, and their defense is extremely solid. Specific data shows that at home, the Philippines average 2.9 goals, 2.9 corner - kicks, and 1.7 yellow cards per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency ranks among the top in the league. On the other hand, the Myanmar team faces severe challenges on the road. In 6 away games, they only managed 2 wins, 1 draw, and 3 losses, with a win rate of just 33.3%. They averaged only 1.16 goals per game and conceded as many as 17 goals. The Philippine team demonstrates remarkable dominance when playing at home. This season, their home - win rate stands at an impressive 83.3%. In 10 home games, they scored 21 goals while conceding only 7, with a goal difference of 14. Their average goals per home game rea

AH
ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
ICEKHID

The historical head - to - head records and recent data between the Philippines and Myanmar serve as the key basis for this analysis. The Philippines has a solid recent form. In their last five games, they achieved 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss. At home, they have an unbeaten record of 1 win and 1 draw, with an average of 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded per game. Their ball - possession rate is consistently above 65%. They showed excellent defensive skills when they defeated Thailand 1 - 0 at home, demonstrating their defensive capabilities. On the other hand, Myanmar's recent form is inconsistent. In their last five games, they had 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. Their away - game performance is weak. In their last three away games, they only got 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding 1.3 goals per game. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines has an edge, winning 2 out of the last 3 meetings. In the 2023 group - stage match, t

AH
ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar

More Tips

In this Uzbekistan Super League encounter, the performance of Fergana FK and Namangan 2009 in various aspects shows a clear gap. In terms of attack, Fergana FK has a higher conversion rate of offensive end, reaching 18.3%, compared to Namangan 2009's 14.1%. The xG value of 0.92 also indicates their attacking superiority over the 0.65 of Namangan 2009. In addition, the value of forward passes of Fergana FK is 12.7 points, much higher than the 9.3 points of Namangan 2009. And their key - pass success rate is 62%, better than the 55% of the opponent. In midfield control, Fergana FK has an effective connection between an average of 112 successful passes per game and 3.2 interceptions. Their running distance is 11.8 km, 1.2 km more than that of Namangan 2009. They also have 28 high - intensity sprints, leading Namangan 2009's 22 times. On the defensive end, Fergana FK has 15 tackles, 8 clearances and 18 interceptions, all better than the 11 tackles, 5 clearances and 14 interceptions of Nama

AH
UZB D1 Neftchi Fargona - Navbahor Namangan
In this Champions League encounter, let's take a look at how the two teams stack up. Gubis has shown a higher - efficiency offense. Their average offensive conversion rate per game is 18.2%, which is better than Sabah's 14.4%. The expected goals (xG) value of Gubis reaches 1.82, higher than Sabah's 1.35. In terms of passing, Gubis' key passing success rate is 72%, compared to Sabah's 58%. The value of their front - field passes is 62.3, while Sabah's is only 45.1, indicating that Gubis has an advantage in midfield control. Gubis' players are also more energetic on the pitch. The whole team runs an average of 112.4 km per game, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 23 times, 40% more than Sabah. On the defensive end, Gubis has 12.4 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game. Their clearance data is 30% better than Sabah's. Moreover, Gubis' offensive efficiency and scoring opportunity conversion rate are 21.7% and 68% respectively, both higher than Sabah's 16.3% and 55%. Overall, Gub

AH
UEFA CL KuPs - Sabah FK Baku
Nassaf holds a significant edge in offensive conversion rate (18.3% vs 12.1%) and xG efficiency (1.24 vs 0.89). They also have the upper hand in key pass success rate (67% vs 52%) and front - court passing value (4.3 vs 2.8). In terms of midfield control, Nassaf averages 12.4 tackles and 9.1 interceptions per game. Their high - intensity running distance reaches 112.3 km, 8.6 km more than their opponents. As for Kyzylkum, their number of clearances (15) and interception success rate (61%) are both lower than Nassaf's (18/68%). This indicates that Nassaf is in a stronger position overall in this match. Nassaf has shown a remarkable offensive efficiency. They've managed to convert 12 shots on target out of 34 offensive plays, with a scoring - chance conversion rate of 35%, far exceeding Kyzylkum's 19%. The expected goals (xG) of Nassaf, which stands at 2.12, is higher than Kyzylkum's 1.43. In terms of pressure, Nassaf's front - line players have achieved 23 successful tackles, effectivel

AH
UZB D1 Nasaf Qarshi - Qizilqum Zarafshon

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Philippines VS Myanmar