APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
VIAMOND💎Won 6/6Follow85.7%Win Rate +61%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
Cooper MwaangaFollow83.3%Win Rate +44.3%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
Boruto Otsutsuki ⭐⭐⭐🏳️🌈Follow81.8%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 11Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Freeman55Won 10/12Follow78.6%Win Rate +40.4%ROI 14Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
Simon PhillipsFollow75%Win Rate +33%ROI 20Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
6
NyraFollow72.7%Win Rate +39.4%ROI 22Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Grey🎧 big speakers 🌍💸The conversion rate of this team is 2, higher than Saint - Gilloise's 1.4. Moreover, its expected goal efficiency (xG/attack completion) is 0.18 higher, indicating a better finishing ability. In terms of key pass success rate, it stands at 76.4%, compared to the opponent's 68%. The value of its forward passes is 3 higher, suggesting a more threatening offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, this team has a passing success rate of 89%. The speed of converting ball possession is 18.3 meters per minute, significantly faster than the opponent's 14.1 meters, clearly exerting rhythm control over the game. Bruges shows superior finishing ability. Its conversion rate is 2, higher than Saint - Gilloise's 1.4, and the expected goal efficiency (xG/attack end) is 0.18 higher. This indicates that Bruges is more efficient in finishing attacks. In terms of organization, Bruges is also more threatening. The success rate of its key passes is 76.4%, compared to Saint - Gilloise's 68%,AH
BEL SC
Club Brugge
0-0
Saint Gilloise
-
Adin ReportsBruges' home - field advantage gives them a significant edge in this match. In terms of offensive efficiency, Bruges has a 21% conversion rate at the end of attacks, which is notably higher than Saint - Gilloise's 14%. Their expected goal efficiency (xG/attack end) is 0.18 higher, indicating better finishing ability. When it comes to organization, Bruges shows more threat. Their key pass success rate stands at 76%, compared to Saint - Gilloise's 68%. The value of their forward passes is 34% higher, suggesting a more effective attacking organization. In midfield control, Bruges is also superior. They have a passing success rate of 89% and a ball - possession rate of 58%. Their transition speed is 18.3 meters per minute, much faster than Saint - Gilloise's 14 meters. In terms of physical performance, Bruges runs a total of 112 kilometers and has 147 high - intensity sprints, leading Saint - Gilloise's 4.7 kilometers and 118 sprints respectively. This shows that Bruges has an advantage inAHBEL SC
Club Brugge
0-0
Saint Gilloise
-
Andie PeciBruges has shown more stable offensive and defensive performances recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 28%, significantly higher than Sint-Truiden's 19%. Playing at home, Bruges has a passing success rate as high as 87%, with a key - passing success rate of 42%. The passing value index in the front - field reaches 1.8. The team has strong midfield control, with an average passing distance of 32 meters, and a notable improvement in transition speed. Bruges' total running distance in a game reaches 11.2 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 42, indicating an obvious physical advantage. So, how should we interpret the outcome of this game? St. -Gilloise has some weaknesses in their defense. Their successful tackle rate is only 68%, and they've made just 15 interceptions. On the offensive end, although they've created 12 goal - scoring chances, their on - target shooting rate is only 42%, and the expected goal value stands at just 1.2. In contrast, Club BAHBEL SC
Club Brugge
0-0
Saint Gilloise
BEL SC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X