APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Garis TengahWon 10/12Follow81.3%Win Rate +32%ROI 16Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
2
Ben WayWon 8/8Follow78.3%Win Rate +53%ROI 24Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
3
mata jalyWon 7/7Follow77.8%Win Rate +24.6%ROI 18Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
Decs🐐♒Won 15/20Follow76.2%Win Rate +38.5%ROI 21Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
Gem JohnWon 6/7Follow75%Win Rate +33.5%ROI 30Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
Lord SatoshiWon 6/8Follow75%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 10Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Okiem MadridistyIn this friendly match between Chelsea and Juventus, both teams showed mediocre offensive efficiency. Chelsea's offensive conversion rate was only 12%, lower than Juventus' 15%. However, Juventus' xG efficiency value of 1.2 was lower than Chelsea's 1.4, indicating a lack of quality in finishing attacks. In terms of key pass success rate, Juventus reached 78%, better than Chelsea's 72%. But the value of their forward passes was only 0.35 times per 90 minutes, reflecting limited ability to create absolute goal - scoring opportunities. Chelsea led with a 58% midfield control rate, yet their transition attack speed was only 4.2 times per game. Juventus built their positional attack through 423 short passes. In terms of physical data, the whole Juventus team ran 112 km and had 189 high - intensity sprints, 7 km more and 23 more sprints than Chelsea. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Juventus has shown a dominant edge in defense. ThO/U
INT CF
Chelsea
0-1 Juventus
-
The Chelsea VerdictChelsea has shown a strong performance in recent friendlies. Their offensive conversion rate per game stands at 18.7%, which is higher than Juventus's 13.2%. Moreover, their expected goal efficiency (xG/attacking end) is 0.19, ranking among the top in Europe. In terms of key passing success rate, Chelsea reaches 76.4%, while Juventus is at 68.9%. The value of Chelsea's front - field passes is 22% higher. When it comes to midfield control, Chelsea has an average ball possession rate of 61.3%. Their transition speed is 12.4 meters per second, significantly faster than Juventus's 9.8 meters per second. In running statistics, Chelsea has 47 high - intensity sprints throughout the field and a total running distance of 118.6 kilometers, which are better than Juventus's 39 sprints and 112.1 kilometers. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Set up notifications to get them in a timely manner！ Juventus has a slightly higher number of tackles and interO/UINT CF
Chelsea
0-1 Juventus
-
vFxdiChelsea primarily adopts a high - pressing possession - based tactic. They rely on the running and interpenetration of their forward players to stretch the opponent's defense. Their main offensive methods are wing breakthroughs and central penetration. With a rich squad depth, Chelsea focused on squad rotation and tactical integration during the warm - up period. However, the team is still working on the understanding and coordination within the current formation. When they push forward aggressively, there are fluctuations in the defensive cooperation in the flanks of the back - field. The overall stability of the defense under high - intensity confrontation needs improvement. On the other hand, Juventus adheres to a pragmatic and balanced offensive - defensive system. They have strict tactical discipline, with a strong midfield capable of making tough interceptions. The rhythm of their offensive - defensive transitions is well - controlled. When playing away, they are good at a steadyAHINT CF
Chelsea
0-1 Juventus
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X