Chelsea vs Juventus Tips and Predictions O/U u cant ans

International Club Friendly

Analysis More Tips

Chelsea

Juventus

Further Reading

Cloudbet

Historical head - to - head data provides a solid basis for tactical analysis between Chelsea and Juventus. In the last six official encounters, Chelsea's home record against Juventus stands at 2 wins and 1 draw. They had a 4 - 0 thrashing, with a corner kick count of 13 - 3, which showed their dominant ball - possession. There was also a 2 - 2 draw and a 1 - 0 narrow win. On the other hand, Juventus had 2 wins and 1 draw in away games. They achieved a 1 - 0 win, a 3 - 0 victory and a 2 - 2 draw. The corner kick data is a crucial comparison. The 13 - 3 disparity in Chelsea's home games sharply contrasts with Juventus' 1 - 8 situation in away games. This highlights Chelsea's threatening wing attacks and Juventus' disadvantage in ball - possession during away - game defenses. Chelsea has been outstanding in offensive efficiency at home. In their last three home encounters, they've averaged 2.33 goals per game. In a 4 - 0 victory in 2021, they were leading 1 - 0 at halftime, which shows t

O/U
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
nafkah

Chelsea has been struggling at home recently, with a home - game winning rate of just 33.3%. Their home record stands at 2 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses. They average 0.83 goals per game but concede 1.33 goals, indicating obvious flaws in their defense. Looking at all their matches, Chelsea has an overall winning rate of 30%. They average 1.3 goals per game, yet concede 1.8 goals on average, resulting in a negative goal difference of - 0.5. Their offensive efficiency is decent, but their defense lacks consistency. On the other hand, Juventus, as the away team, has shown a strong away - game form. They have an away record of 3 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses, with an impressive winning rate of 50%. They score 0.83 goals per game on average and only concede 0.33 goals, being efficient at both ends of the pitch. In terms of overall statistics, Juventus also has a 50% winning rate. They average 1 goal per game and concede 0.5 goals, with a positive goal difference of + 0.5. Clearly, Juventus has

O/U
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
Jeremiah_Alufohai

Chelsea has shown fluctuating offensive and defensive efficiency in recent matches. In a friendly, they lost 1-2 at home, with a 1-1 draw at half - time and equal corner - kicks. This indicates a lack of finishing ability in the offensive end. Before that, on the road, they were defeated 4-6, having more corner - kicks. It reveals that the away - game offense lacks effective breakthroughs. At the end of the Premier League season, Chelsea had a mixed performance. They won at home, yet also suffered a significant home defeat, which exposed serious defensive issues. In the FA Cup, they lost at home, with low offensive efficiency. Overall, Chelsea's performance has been inconsistent, with problems in both offense and defense that need to be addressed before facing Juventus. Chelsea has been struggling to find their rhythm in recent matches. They adopt a high - pressing passing and controlling tactic, relying on the running and interpenetration of their front - court players to stretch the

AH
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus

More Tips

I've been meticulously researching football matches and making top - notch selections. Moscow Spartak has been in much better attacking form compared to Orenburg Gazovik recently. The attack conversion rate of Moscow Spartak is 18.7%, while that of Orenburg Gazovik is only 9.2%. The expected goals per shot (xG/shot) of Moscow Spartak is 0.21, which is nearly 60% higher than that of their opponents. In terms of key pass success rate, the midfield of Moscow Spartak has a success rate of 76.4%, and the attacking pass value index is 1.83. These figures far exceed Orenburg Gazovik's 61.1% and 1.07 respectively. The midfield of Moscow Spartak controls the rhythm of the game stably. They have an average of 512 passes per game, and the ball - advancing speed is 12.3 meters per minute, which effectively suppresses the rhythm of their opponents. Orenburg Gazovik has significant weaknesses in defense. Their average of 6.8 tackles, 4.3 interceptions, and 8.1 clearances per game are all below the l

O/U
RUS Cup Spartak Moscow - Gazovik Orenburg
I specialize in match analysis and offer top - notch selections. In this game, although Brann plays at home, their attacking efficiency is quite low. In the last five matches, their offensive finishing conversion rate is only 7.2%, and the expected goal - scoring efficiency is below 0.12. This is far inferior to Apollon Limassol, which has a conversion rate of 14.8% and an expected goal - scoring efficiency of 0.19. The visiting team, Apollon Limassol, has a remarkable key passing success rate of 82%. Their front - court passing value index is 31% higher, indicating a more efficient offensive organization. In terms of midfield control, Apollon Limassol's passing success rate reaches 91.3%, and they hold the ball for 58% of the game time. Their frequency of fast - break conversions is 40% higher, effectively suppressing the rhythm of the home team, Brann. Apollo Limassol shows a clear edge in both defensive and offensive departments when compared to Brann. In defense, Apollo Limassol is

AH
UEFA ECL Brann - Apollon Limassol FC
I've been meticulously researching football matches and here is my analysis. In terms of recent performances, St. Petersburg Zenit has demonstrated remarkable offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in the attacking end is extremely high, with an average of 4.8 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 23%, far exceeding Batka's 11%. When it comes to key passing success rates, Zenit boasts an outstanding 78%, and their front - court passing value index stands at 1.27. In contrast, Batka only manages 61% and 0.89 respectively. In midfield control, Zenit dominates with an average ball possession rate of 64% per game. Moreover, their fast - break speed is an impressive 18.3 meters per second, significantly faster than Batka's 12.1 meters per second. Overall, St. Petersburg Zenit shows clear superiority in multiple aspects of the game, which bodes well for their performance in this match. Zenit St. Petersburg's recent offensive form has been quite impressive. In terms of offens

O/U
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - Baltika Kaliningrad

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Chelsea VS Juventus