APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Villarreal VS Levante

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Villarreal
    Villarreal 1
    0 Levante
    Levante
    Further Reading
    • Salvador González Valero
      Salvador González Valero
      Villarreal's recent performances have been stable. In contrast, Levante is in mediocre form and lags behind the home team to a certain extent. The away team lacks good wingers. Their only threat lies in central penetration. Moreover, they don't have a super - strong striker, which results in a relatively weak scoring ability. Both sides have a strong desire for victory. They both show good competitiveness and offensive capabilities in this game. When they face off, the winner will likely be the team that holds an edge. Both teams have relatively stable offensive capabilities. The key to the home team, Villarreal, seeing a significant improvement in recent data lies in the excellent performance of its defense. There's an obvious upturn in its form, yet its real state is seriously underestimated. On the other hand, the away team, Levante, has players with strong individual qualities. In particular, the starting striker has scored goals in various competitions and has been very versatile
      AH
      INT CF Villarreal 1-0 Levante
    • vFxdi
      vFxdi
      Villarreal plays with a four - defender formation that focuses on ball control and forward progression. At home, they take advantage of the pitch conditions to carry out crosses from the flanks and penetrate through the middle. The veteran midfielders are responsible for organizing the offensive and defensive rhythm, and set - pieces are their main offensive weapon. However, the team made significant changes to its lineup during the summer transfer window, with many key players leaving or joining. During the pre - season, there was a high degree of rotation, which led to some issues in terms of formation cohesion. When the full - backs push forward, the defensive midfielders often fail to cover the space behind them. In long - term positional attacks, the lateral movement and connection among defenders can be disjointed, and the stability of the defense weakens in the second half of high - intensity games. On the other hand, Levante deploys a five - defender defensive system. When play
      AH
      INT CF Villarreal 1-0 Levante
    • Post United
      Post United
      In the upcoming friendly match, the confrontation between Villarreal and Levante will feature a fierce comparison of offensive and defensive data. Villarreal's recent performance shows a 40% win rate, a 20% draw rate, and a 40% loss rate. They've scored a total of 21 goals, conceded 15, with a goal difference of +6. Their average goals per game stand at 2.1, average corners at 4, and average yellow cards at 1.6. On the offensive end, Villarreal is quite strong. With an average of 2.1 goals per game, their fire - power leads in similar competitions. Defensively, they concede 1.5 goals per game on average. Coupled with a relatively good discipline control of 1.6 yellow cards per game, it indicates a relatively balanced offensive and defensive system. However, the 40% loss rate reveals the team's instability in crucial games. Especially when leading, their defensive concentration is prone to fluctuations. This weakness could be a potential variable in the match. Villarreal shows remarkabl
      O/U
      INT CF Villarreal 1-0 Levante
    More Tips
    • In the Russian Cup encounter between Spartak Moscow and Gazovik Orenburg, there's a clear disparity in offensive efficiency between the two sides. Spartak Moscow has shown a better offensive end - conversion rate this season, standing at 12.3%, compared to Gazovik Orenburg's 9.8%. However, the xG (expected goals) efficiency tells a different story. Spartak Moscow's xG value is 1.15, while Gazovik Orenburg's is 1.02, indicating that the deviation between the actual scores and the theoretical values is relatively small for both teams. In terms of passing, Spartak Moscow outperforms Gazovik Orenburg. The key - pass success rate of Spartak Moscow is 76.4%, higher than Gazovik Orenburg's 71.2%. The passing value in the front 30 - meter area is 0.48 for Spartak Moscow, compared to 0.39 for Gazovik Orenburg, which shows a more accurate offensive organization from Spartak Moscow. When it comes to midfield control, Spartak Moscow also has an edge. They have an average ball - possession rate of
      O/U
      RUS Cup Spartak Moscow - Gazovik Orenburg
    • In this Champions League encounter, let's analyze the performance of Aarhus and Sabah. Aarhus has a relatively lower average offensive conversion rate of only 9.8% per game, which is inferior to Sabah's 12.1%. However, Aarhus shines in terms of xG efficiency, achieving 1.42 times per game, significantly better than Sabah's 1.05. In terms of passing, Aarhus leads the league with a key - pass success rate of 82%. The value of its forward - field passes reaches 0.38 per pass, 17% higher than Sabah. The team's midfield control is outstanding. It maintains an average ball - possession rate of 63% and has a transition - attack speed of 7.2 seconds per time, 1.8 seconds faster than Sabah. In terms of physical performance, the whole Aarhus team runs an average of 112 km per game and conducts 193 high - intensity sprints, both of which are more than 14% better than Sabah. I believe that only by making careful and dedicated analysis can I provide long - term valuable insights. In recent matches,
      O/U
      UEFA CL Aarhus AGF - Sabah FK Baku
    • Fenerbahçe has been in excellent attacking form lately. Their offensive conversion rate stands at an impressive 22.3%, significantly higher than Graz Storm's 17.8%. In terms of key pass success rate, the home - team Fenerbahçe leads with 82%, outperforming Graz Storm's 74%. They also have a high - value passing performance in the front - field, averaging 4.3 valuable passes per game and creating more than 3 excellent goal - scoring opportunities each match. The contrast in midfield control is quite evident. Fenerbahçe regains possession of the ball 68 times per game on average and turns these into 8.1 offensive finishes. In comparison, Graz Storm only manages to achieve 5.4 offensive finishes from the regained ball. Both teams cover over 110 kilometers in running distance during a game. However, Fenerbahçe has 213 high - intensity sprints, 19% more than their opponents, effectively covering both offensive and defensive areas. I believe in making well - thought - out recommendations
      O/U
      UEFA CL Fenerbahce - Sturm Graz
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.