APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Thun VS Vikingur Reykjavik

    UEFA Europa League
    Analysis More Tips
    Thun
    Thun
    Vikingur Reykjavik
    Vikingur Reykjavik
    Further Reading
    • FRANKLIN CHIGB
      FRANKLIN CHIGB
      Thun employs a progressive and hierarchical passing and controlling tactic at home. They methodically organize the game rhythm from the midfield, and steadily advance their attacks with smooth and regular short passes, gradually taking the initiative on the pitch and accumulating competitive advantages. Thun has been consistent in its home - field attacks recently. The team can launch an average of 22.7 high - quality effective attacks per game. Their crosses from the flanks are well - placed, and they excel in second - chance attacks and finishing, showing great coherence in their offensive plays. However, Thun has a relatively weak physical confrontation ability. The average success rate of their physical confrontations is less than 47%. When at a disadvantage in close - range tackles, they are prone to losing the ball, which directly causes small and irregular fluctuations in the smoothness of their offensive - defensive transitions. Vikingur plays an aggressive style away from home
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    • Gominsport
      Gominsport
      Thun's defensive performance in their home games in the Europa Cup is a cause for concern. Statistics show that in their 6 home games this season, Thun has scored 12 goals but conceded 20, resulting in a goal difference of -8. They average 2.0 goals per game but concede a staggering 3.33 goals per game, indicating a serious imbalance in offensive and defensive efficiency. The defensive statistics also reveal that Thun receives an average of 2.0 yellow cards per home game, suggesting a lack of discipline in their defensive play and a tendency to make mistakes under pressure. Overall, Thun has a win - rate of only 20% in all competitions, with 40% draws and 40% losses. They have conceded as many as 26 goals, making them one of the weakest defensive teams in the league. On the other hand, Vikingur, as the away team, has also had a poor away - game record. In their 6 away games, Vikingur has only scored 9 goals and conceded 12, with a goal difference of -3. Their average of 1.5 goals per g
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    • Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Thun adopts a well - balanced playing style that focuses on a stable midfield and coordinated defense. The team has a smooth connection among the three lines, and the players' physical energy distribution on the field is scientific. Even under the pressure of a dense schedule across multiple competitions, the team's overall form has shown minimal fluctuations. Recently, Thun has averaged 10.4 accurate clearances from the backcourt per game. Their low - level multi - layer defensive system is solid. The defenders at the backcourt make accurate judgments on positioning, effectively defusing various attacking moves launched by the opponents' front - line players. In the midfield, the players concentrate on organizing the game rhythm and providing defensive buffer. They strictly control mistakes on the field. However, the team's weakness is the lack of creativity in the front - court's independent attacks. The conversion rate of the numerous small attacking opportunities has long remained
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    More Tips
    • Both KuPS and Universitatea Craiova have shown inefficiency in their offensive ends. KuPS has an offensive conversion rate of only 12%, which is lower than the league average. Meanwhile, Universitatea Craiova has an xG efficiency of 0.72, lower than their opponent. Passing data reveals the differences between the two teams. KuPS has a key - pass success rate of 61%, better than Universitatea Craiova's 54%. KuPS also records 3.8 valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. In terms of midfield control, KuPS leads with 11.2 tackles per game on average, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession. Running statistics show that KuPS has a total team running distance of 112.3 kilometers and 47 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than those of Universitatea Craiova. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected matches every day. In terms of the defensive performance, Universitatea Craiova is at a clear disadvantage. Their average o
      O/U
      UEFA EL KuPs - CS Universitatea Craiova
    • Turku International has demonstrated higher efficiency in the offensive end. The overall offensive conversion rate of 18.2% is better than Vaduz's 12.7%. The xG value of 1.32 compared to 0.89 reflects a stronger threat. In terms of key passes, Turku's success rate of 62% leads Vaduz's 49%. The value of forward passes reaches 12.7 times per 90 minutes. Regarding midfield control, Turku has an average of 9.3 tackles per game, and its transition speed of 1.8 seconds per time is better than Vaduz's 2.4 seconds. The total running distance of the whole team is 112.4 kilometers, with 43 high - intensity sprints, both higher than Vaduz's 104.8 kilometers and 31 sprints. I have a professional analysis team and can provide in - depth analysis of selected matches. Vaduz's defensive stats reveal significant weaknesses. They average only 5.1 tackles per game, and their interception success rate of 41% is far lower than Turku's 68%. Despite making 14 clearances, they still struggle to prevent oppone
      AH
      UEFA ECL Inter Turku - Vaduz
    • I have a multi - person team that carefully selects and thoroughly analyzes matches every day. In terms of offensive performance, Białystok Jagielonia has a 12% higher conversion rate of offensive finishes compared to their opponents. Their xG value stands at 1.8, which is better than their opponents' 1.2. They also lead by 15% in the value of forward - field passes. The success rate of their key passes is 68%, while that of their opponents is 52%. In the midfield, Jagielonia shows strong control. They have 4 more interceptions than their opponents, with a high - intensity sprint frequency of 12 times per 90 minutes. In the defensive aspect, they have 3 more tackles than their opponents and lead in clearance statistics. Regarding midfield control, Jagielonia has an average ball - possession rate of 58%, suppressing their opponents' 42%. Their transition speed has increased by 20%. The whole team runs a distance of 112 kilometers, 9.4 kilometers more than their opponents, and the numbe
      AH
      UEFA EL Jagiellonia Bialystok - Glasgow Rangers
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.