APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> JJ BEDDINGS>

    Thun VS Vikingur Reykjavik

    UEFA Europa League
    Analysis More Tips
    Thun
    Thun
    Vikingur Reykjavik
    Vikingur Reykjavik
    Further Reading
    • altpzzy
      altpzzy
      Thun has a long period of integration for its local players, and its starting lineup is firmly established. There are no concerns about injuries or suspensions, and the tactical system is well - polished. The team members have a high degree of cooperation. In the recent seven rounds, Thun achieved 2 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, and it has a stable position in the middle of the league table. The team is well - adapted to its home field. It has excellent low - position defensive pressure - resistance ability, and the rhythm of its tackles highly matches the local game environment. As a result, the probability of conceding points at home is relatively low. Thun adopts a practical playing style, controlling the midfield rhythm and making offensive threats from the flanks. Its offensive strategy is clear. The forwards have a keen sense of seizing opportunities in the penalty area and are stable in front of the goal. The midfielders run actively, taking into account both interceptions, steals
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    • Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠
      Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠
      Thorn's defensive performance in their home games in the Europa Cup is a cause for concern. Statistics show that in their 6 home games this season, Thorn has scored a total of 12 goals but conceded 20, resulting in a goal difference of -8. They average 2.0 goals per game but concede 3.33 goals per game, indicating a serious imbalance in offensive and defensive efficiency. The defensive data also reveals that Thorn receives an average of 2.0 yellow cards per home game, suggesting a lack of discipline in defense and a tendency to make mistakes under pressure. Overall, in all competitions, Thorn has a win rate of only 20%, a draw rate of 40%, and a loss rate of 40%. They have conceded as many as 26 goals, making them one of the weakest defensive teams in the league. On the other hand, Vikingur, as the away team, also has a poor away record. In their 6 away games, Vikingur has only scored 9 goals and conceded 12, with a goal difference of -3. Their average of 1.5 goals per game shows relat
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    • Iqbal ahmad
      Iqbal ahmad
      Thun holds an edge in offensive finishing conversion rate (18.3% vs 14.7%) and xG efficiency (1.24 vs 0.98). Their forward - passing value (1.72 vs 1.35) is also more efficient. Vikingur has a slight advantage in the key - pass success rate (62% vs 55%). However, Thun outperforms in midfield interceptions (14 times vs 9 times) and high - intensity sprints (11 times vs 7 times). The running distances of the two teams are quite close (112km vs 110km). But Thun's average of 12 successful tackles per game shows stronger defensive tenacity. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected football matches every day. In this Europa Cup encounter, a detailed analysis of the two teams' performance reveals interesting insights. Vikingur RKVÍK shows greater offensive threat, with a higher conversion rate of scoring opportunities (29% vs 21%) and a better xG (1.12 vs 0.89). However, Thun has the upper - hand in the defensive department, boasting more clearance
      AH
      UEFA EL Thun - Vikingur Reykjavik
    More Tips
    • Gubis has shown greater efficiency in the attacking end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.6%, superior to Universitatea Craiova's 12.3%, and their xG value of 1.28 also has an edge over the latter's 0.79. In terms of key passes, Gubis' success rate is 62%, leading Universitatea Craiova's 49%. The value of their forward passes reaches 14.7 times per 90 minutes. Regarding midfield control, Gubis averages 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per time, faster than Universitatea Craiova's 2.3 seconds. The whole team of Gubis runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game and has 32 high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness reserves. I'm good at selecting matches daily with unique insights and rare data. The defensive statistics of Universitatea Craiova are rather weak. Their average of 6.1 clearances per game is lower than KuPS's 8.9. The interception efficiency stands at only 2.1 times per 90 minutes. In attack, thei
      AH
      UEFA EL KuPs - CS Universitatea Craiova
    • In the UEFA Europa Conference League encounter, Vaduz holds a clear edge in several crucial aspects. In terms of key passing success rate, Vaduz boasts 62% compared to Turku International's 48%. The value of their forward passes is also higher, with 1.8 against Turku's 1.2. In the midfield, Vaduz is more proactive. They have more interceptions, 15 compared to 9 of Turku, and a higher tackle success rate of 78% against Turku's 65%. In terms of running intensity, Vaduz has 12 high - intensity sprints while Turku has only 8. Their total running distance reaches 118km, 2.3km more than the home team. On the offensive end, Vaduz is more efficient. Their offensive conversion rate is 18%, significantly higher than Turku's 12%, and their xG value is 2.1 compared to Turku's 1.3. All these factors suggest that Vaduz has a strong chance of performing well in this match. Vaduz demonstrates remarkable midfield control through high - frequency short passes (23 successful short passes per game on aver
      AH
      UEFA ECL Inter Turku - Vaduz
    • I'm good at analyzing unique issues and rare data. In this match, Białystok Jagiellonia shows significant advantages over Rangers Glasgow. In terms of attack, Białystok Jagiellonia's offensive end conversion rate is 18.3%, much better than Rangers Glasgow's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 to 0.89 highlights their attacking superiority. The value of forward passes is 1.73 compared to 1.41, and the key pass success rate is 62% against 55%, indicating better control in the midfield. In terms of physical fitness, the whole team of Białystok Jagiellonia runs an average of 112.4 km, more than Rangers Glasgow's 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 times compared to 18 times, showing more abundant physical reserves. On the defensive end, Białystok Jagiellonia has 14 tackles compared to 9, 11 interceptions compared to 7, and a clearance data of 8.4, which means their defense is more stable. Glasgow Rangers had a disappointing performance in the attacking third. They misse
      AH
      UEFA EL Jagiellonia Bialystok - Glasgow Rangers
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.