APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
ConstanceWon 8/8Follow90%Win Rate +36.4%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
AfsiezWon 6/6Follow86.7%Win Rate +57.4%ROI 17Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
TopnotchWon 10/12Follow77.8%Win Rate +16.9%ROI 18Tips 1.50Avg Odds -
4
Ben WayWon 7/7Follow76%Win Rate +41.7%ROI 26Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
AbuleWon 9/9Follow75%Win Rate +14.9%ROI 24Tips 1.59Avg Odds -
6
Garoux 777Won 6/7Follow75%Win Rate +32.2%ROI 17Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Russ444Chelsea has been in poor form recently. Their win rate stands at only 30%, with a 10% draw rate and a 60% loss rate. The offensive and defensive data reveals a significant weakness in the defense. Specifically, in past matches, Chelsea scored 13 goals and conceded 18, with a goal difference of -5. They averaged 1.3 goals per game and 1.8 goals conceded per game, showing a serious lack of defensive stability. The team averages 4.5 corner - kicks per game, significantly higher than AC Milan's 2.8, indicating that Chelsea invests more in the wing attack. However, a high possession rate also comes with a high risk of conceding goals, and their defensive system has a weak ability to suppress the opponent's offense. Moreover, Chelsea averages 2.5 yellow cards per game, highlighting serious discipline issues. Frequent fouls may disrupt the rhythm of the game. AC Milan has a win rate of 20%, a draw rate of 30%, and a loss rate of 50%. Their offensive efficiency is relatively low, having scoredAH
INT CF
Chelsea
3-0 AC Milan
INT CFMore Tips
-
Looking at the historical head - to - head data between Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps, there's a clear contrast in offensive and defensive transitions. In the last five years of their official encounters, when Chicago Fire played at home, Vancouver Whitecaps had a significant edge in corner kicks. In four meetings, the corner - kick differences were all negative for Chicago Fire (-5, -0, -2, -5). This shows that Vancouver Whitecaps were more proactive and dominant in set - piece situations. For instance, in a game where Chicago Fire lost 0 - 1 at home, Vancouver Whitecaps led by 5 corner kicks. In a 1 - 1 draw, the Whitecaps had a 2 - corner - kick advantage. These results indirectly point out potential weaknesses in Chicago Fire's home - defense, especially in aerial duels and defending on the flanks. Vancouver Whitecaps' corner - kick data shows an opposite trend when playing away. In their last four away games, the corner - kick differences were all negative (-6, -4, -6, -3).AH
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X