APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> amvn>

    Arsenal VS Como

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Arsenal
    Arsenal 1
    1 Como
    Como
    I'm a well - known expert in football analysis and have long - term and stable information. I've designed a long - term high - quality product for my fans. In the friendly match between Arsenal and Como, there's a significant difference in offensive efficiency between the two sides. Arsenal has an outstanding performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate per game reaches 18.3%, far exceeding the average level in Serie A. However, Como's defense has effectively restricted Arsenal, limiting their expected goals (xG) to 0.9 per game. In terms of passing data, Arsenal also holds an edge. Their key passing success rate stands at 82%, and they achieve 1.7 passes of value (PA.V) in the front 30 - meter area. In contrast, Como has a 67% key passing success rate and only 0.8 PA.V, which puts them at a disadvantage. Arsenal's midfield control is remarkable. They have an average ball - possession rate of over 65% and a passing success rate of 85%, which allows them to dominate the game. Nevertheless, their speed in transition attacks is relatively slow, with fast - break plays accounting for only 28% of their total offensive plays.
    Further Reading
    • Trevor Muse
      Trevor Muse
      Arsenal has shown significant fluctuations in form during the 2026 summer friendlies. In these friendlies, Arsenal suffered several defeats. They lost 2-3 to Borussia Dortmund away, with a 0-2 deficit at half - time and 8-3 in corner kicks. Against Real Betis, they were beaten 1-3 away, trailing 1-3 at half - time and having a 2-2 corner - kick record. And they had a heavy 1-4 loss to Girona away, being 0-2 down at half - time and having a 5-4 corner - kick situation. In these three games, they only managed 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss, facing challenges in both offensive efficiency and defensive stability. However, the Gunners demonstrated strong home - field resilience during the crucial stage of the Premier League in May. They achieved four consecutive home wins. They defeated Burnley 1-0, leading 1-0 at half - time with 3-3 corner kicks. They also won 1-0 against West Ham United, despite a goalless first half and a 4-3 corner - kick advantage. Against Atlético Madrid, they triumphed
      O/U
      INT CF Arsenal 1-1 Como
    • Post United
      Post United
      Arsenal has shown significant fluctuations in their recent friendly matches. They lost 2-3 to Borussia Dortmund away in the Emirates Cup, trailing 0-2 at halftime and being at a disadvantage in corner kicks with 8-3. They also lost 1-3 to Real Betis on a neutral ground, being 1-3 down at halftime with 2-2 corner kicks. However, they thrashed Girona 4-1 away, leading 0-2 at halftime and having 5-4 corner kicks. In these three friendlies, they had one win and two losses, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game, indicating prominent defensive flaws. Previously, in the Champions League semi - final, they drew 1-1 with Paris Saint - Germain. The huge gap in corner kicks (10-0) reflected their ball - possession advantage. But in the friendlies, their offensive and defensive efficiency has not met expectations. Although they had a decent form in the European competitions and the end of the league, their recent friendly form has declined notably. On the other hand, Como ha
      O/U
      INT CF Arsenal 1-1 Como
    • Pi314
      Pi314
      Arsenal has been in excellent form recently, with a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 22.3%, significantly higher than Como's 15.8%. Moreover, their xG value is 2.4, while Como only has 1.1. In terms of offensive organization, Arsenal also outperforms. Their key pass success rate is 83%, and the passing value in the front - field is 0.35, compared to Como's 74% and 0.22 respectively. This shows Arsenal's stronger ability to organize attacks. When it comes to midfield control, Arsenal holds a 62% possession rate and has an average transition time of 14.2 seconds, which effectively suppresses Como's rhythm. In addition, Arsenal shows remarkable physical advantages. The whole team runs a distance of 118km (Como runs 1.4km) and makes 43 high - intensity sprints, compared to Como's 28 times. Overall, Arsenal seems to be in a very favorable position in this game. Join me to follow more insightful analyses！ Arsenal has been in excellent form recen
      AH
      INT CF Arsenal 1-1 Como
    More Tips
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - term stable track record. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. In this comparison, Santa Fe shows significant advantages over River Plate. Santa Fe's offensive finishing conversion rate is 18.3%, better than River Plate's 14.7%. The xG value of 1.24 for Santa Fe against 0.91 of River Plate reflects its offensive efficiency edge. The key pass success rate of Santa Fe is 62%, which is higher than River Plate's 55%. The value of forward passes for Santa Fe is 1.83, superior to River Plate's 1.42. In terms of midfield control, Santa Fe has a 58% possession rate compared to River Plate's 42%. The average transition speed of Santa Fe is 12.4 seconds, faster than River Plate's 15.1 seconds. The total team running distance of Santa Fe is 112.3 km, 3.7 km more than River Plate's 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for Santa Fe and 18 for River Plate, indicating Santa Fe's physical advantage. River Plate
      AH
      CON CSA Independiente Santa Fe Postp. River Plate
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing quality information, and this analysis is a long - term high - quality offering tailored for enthusiasts. When comparing the offensive efficiency of Cruzeiro and Flamengo, significant differences emerge. Flamengo has an offensive conversion rate of 22.4% (xG efficiency of 1.3), while Cruzeiro stands at 18.2% (xG efficiency of 0.92). In terms of passing, Flamengo shows better performance. Their key pass success rate reaches 86.3%, and the value of their forward passes is 0.81. For Cruzeiro, these figures are 79.4% and 0.68 respectively. As for the midfield, Flamengo, as the likely winning side, controls 59.1% of the midfield and has a transition speed of 3.1 seconds, which reflects their fast - paced offensive and defensive rhythm. Looking at the running data, Flamengo's high - intensity sprinting distance is 12.8 km, 12% more than their opponents, highlighting their physical fitness advantage. All th
      AH
      CON CLA Cruzeiro - Flamengo
    • I've crafted a long - term, high - quality product tailored for big fans. In this season, Toluca has an average offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, ranking 4th in the league, while FC Dallas stands at 16.9%, ranking 7th. According to the xG model, Toluca creates 2.1 expected goals every 90 minutes, compared to Dallas' 1.8. Both teams have high key - pass success rates, 82% for Toluca and 79% for Dallas. However, Toluca's front - field passing value coefficient is 1.35, ranking 3rd in the league, significantly better than Dallas' 1.12. In midfield control, Toluca regains possession 58 times per game on average, ranking 2nd in the league, while Dallas does it 53 times, ranking 5th. With Toluca having 18.7 sprints per minute and Dallas having 17.2, Toluca can maintain a continuous pressing rhythm.
      O/U
      NCAL Cup Toluca - FC Dallas
    Nowgoal26.com
    Telegram Facebook X
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.