APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Brandon Mitchell
318
Articles
1
Like
1
Follower
49.1%
Win Rate
-13.9%
ROI
57
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 9/9Follow100%Win Rate +80.2%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 11/13Follow84.6%Win Rate +52.7%ROI 13Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
b3ndarWon 6/6Follow78.6%Win Rate +24.9%ROI 14Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
4
Antons Luckn BWon 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +26.1%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
5
KnightopeeWon 12/15Follow73.9%Win Rate +40.7%ROI 25Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
6
Abuga with a G🐐Follow72.7%Win Rate +25.1%ROI 14Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Loyal08 Won 5/8Blue Cross has been on a remarkable run lately, with their excellent performance attributed to significant improvements in both offense and defense. They are in top - form and showing great prowess on the pitch. On the other hand, Chicago Fire is known for their tenacious and fearless style of play. They have a strong ability to execute their tactics effectively. Blue Cross has been performing outstandingly, and their ability to secure points is much stronger than that of Chicago Fire. They clearly have the motivation to win this game. Both teams will give their all. Chicago Fire, in particular, has made considerable progress recently and shows an upward trend. The home team, Blue Cross, has an excellent record at home, while the away team, Chicago Fire, also has decent away - game capabilities. In terms of the overall strength comparison, Blue Cross still holds an edge. Even though Chicago Fire is the underdog, they have a positive attitude towards this match. The question now is whetAH
NCAL Cup
CDSyC Cruz Azul
1-2 Chicago Fire
-
amvn Won 3/5I've crafted a high - quality, long - term product tailored for big players. Blue Cross is playing at home, yet their offensive efficiency is rather low. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rate is only 8.2%. The expected goals (xG) per game stand at 0.91, significantly lower than the actual goals. On the other hand, Chicago Fire has an average offensive conversion rate of 14.7%, with an xG efficiency 35% higher. Their finishing ability in the front - court is more consistent. In terms of key pass success rate, Fire has an impressive 78.3%, while Blue Cross only manages 63.1%. This means Fire's front - court passes are 22% more valuable. Fire also excels in midfield ball control. They can change the pace smoothly, with a transition speed of 1.8 times per minute, better than Blue Cross's 1.2 times. This allows them to break through the opponent's defense effectively during fast - paced attacks.AHNCAL Cup
CDSyC Cruz Azul
1-2 Chicago Fire
-
Alyana CarterThe data of the two teams shows distinct tactical differences. Blue Cross has an excellent home record this season, with a win - rate of 60%. They score 1.4 goals per game on average, concede 5 goals in total at home, and have a goal difference of +2, indicating a balanced offensive and defensive efficiency. In terms of the overall record, their win - rate is 70%, having scored 20 goals and conceded 13, with a goal difference of +7. Their defense is notably stable, and the goal - conceding rate is significantly lower than that of their opponents. On the other hand, Chicago Fire shows a strong offensive but fragile defensive characteristic in away games. Their away win - rate is 50%, scoring 2 goals per game on average but conceding 7. The goal difference is +1. In the overall record, the win - rate is 60%, with 20 goals scored and 16 conceded, a goal difference of +4. Although their offensive firepower is on par with Blue Cross, defensive flaws lead to a difference in goal difference.O/UNCAL Cup
CDSyC Cruz Azul
1-2 Chicago Fire
NCAL Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X