APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 8/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +58.3%ROI 11Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 11/13Follow84.6%Win Rate +52.7%ROI 13Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Suyash.Won 7/8Follow81.8%Win Rate +50.3%ROI 12Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Antons Luckn BWon 7/7Follow80%Win Rate +37.4%ROI 10Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
PhilegrayFollow76.7%Win Rate +22.3%ROI 30Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
6
DeebaFollow75%Win Rate +31%ROI 12Tips 1.89Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Ian Rapoport Won 5/8The current form of the two teams is a key factor in this encounter. Tersdela is in a decent position, currently sitting at 6th in the league. They had a good start in the previous round, winning away against Nimegen in the first round of the Eredivisie. However, their form has been inconsistent in recent matches, with 2 wins and 2 losses in the last four games. At home, Tersdela has a strong record. They've achieved 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses in their last ten home games, showing a relatively high unbeaten rate. During this period, they averaged 2.0 goals per game and conceded only 1.2 goals on average, indicating a strong attack and a fairly stable defense. On the other hand, Rotterdam Sparta is struggling. They are currently ranked 14th, which is far from satisfactory. They lost their home game to Feyenoord in the first round of the Eredivisie and have failed to win in five consecutive games, clearly in a slump. Away from home, Rotterdam Sparta has a poor record. They've managedAH
HOL D1
SC Telstar
1-3 Sparta Rotterdam
-
Tayyab hafeezTelstar has a well - structured lineup and no key players are injured. The team mainly adopts a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 counter - attacking system. They don't focus on ball - possession but are good at narrowing the defensive depth. They can seize the gaps left by opponents when they push forward and launch quick transitions. Last season, they had a high - efficiency counter - attack at home. Their main scoring methods were sprints on the flanks and goal - side pick - ups. However, there are some issues. Their defense lacks consistency. When under high - pressure for a long time, defenders may make mistakes in coordinated defense. Also, their creativity in positional play is limited. When they fail to score for a long time, the patience of the front - line attackers may decline. The home atmosphere is intense, which allows the team to enter the game state quickly. They are good at engaging in a long - drawn - out battle with opponents. Rotterdam Spartans favor a possession-based style, typicallyAHHOL D1
SC Telstar
1-3 Sparta Rotterdam
-
The Chelsea VerdictIn this match, the offensive performance of Telstar and Sparta Rotterdam shows significant differences. Telstar's offensive conversion rate is 18%, lower than Sparta Rotterdam's 24%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 1.12 also reflects the gap on the offensive end. In terms of passing, Telstar's key - pass success rate of 58% lags behind Sparta Rotterdam's 65%. The passing value in the front - field, with a ratio of 12.3 to 15.8, indicates Telstar's disadvantage in offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, Telstar has a 61% control rate compared to Sparta Rotterdam's 59%. However, Telstar's average transition speed is 12.4 seconds, slower than Sparta Rotterdam's 10.8 seconds. In addition, the total running distance of Telstar is 112 km, while Sparta Rotterdam runs 108 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 23 for Telstar and 31 for Sparta Rotterdam, highlights the difference in physical reserves. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily maAHHOL D1
SC Telstar
1-3 Sparta Rotterdam
HOL D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X