APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Pi314>

    Jeju SK FC VS FC Anyang

    K League 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Jeju SK FC
    Jeju SK FC
    FC Anyang
    FC Anyang
    Further Reading
    • altpzzy
      altpzzy
      Jeju SK currently ranks in the upper - middle of the league. With solid overall combat strength, they have a stable efficiency in getting points in matches. In the last twenty games across various competitions, they achieved 9 wins, 7 draws, and 4 losses. Their offensive and defensive systems are well - polished, and they have good control over mistakes. The team has excellent adaptability at home. They are good at the high - pressure tactics in the middle and front fields combined with cross - passing on the flanks, and the overall rhythm of offensive and defensive transitions is fast. The midfield core, Kim Jin - soo, is a well - rounded player with full - field running coverage. He can not only make interceptions and clearances in the backfield but also accurately send threatening through - balls to activate the front - court offense. The forwards, Lee Geun - jae and Jo Hyun - taek, are in good form. They have a stable ability to grab points in front of the goal and finish in the pe
      AH
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC - FC Anyang
    • pepper4455
      pepper4455 Won 3/4
      1. Tournament Context & Head-to-Head History Competition: K League 1 (2026 South Korean League) - Regular Season. Standings: Jeju United currently sits in 6th place with 28 points from 19 matches. FC Anyang is in 10th place with 17 points. Head-to-Head (H2H): In their last 5 encounters across all competitions, Jeju United has recorded 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. When playing at home (Jeju World Cup Stadium), Jeju United has won both of their last two matches against FC Anyang. Betting Insight: Superior head-to-head records and home-field confidence give Jeju United the upper hand. These factors enhance the reliability of backing the favorite. 2. Recent Form & Goal Statistics Jeju United Form (Last 5 matches): 3 Wins, 1 Draw, 1 Loss. Scoring Record: 7 goals scored (average 1.4 goals/match). Defensive Record: 4 goals conceded (average 0.8 goals/match). FC Anyang Form (Last 5 matches): 1 Win, 1 Draw, 3 Losses. Scoring Record: 4 goals scored (average 0.8 goals/match). Defensive Record: 9 g
      AH
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC - FC Anyang
    • Ρrιηςε Άάrάν
      Ρrιηςε Άάrάν
      The Jeju World Cup Stadium will host a significant match in the K League. Jeju SK, sitting fifth with 31 points, takes on sixth - placed Anyang FC, which has 30 points. With just a one - point gap between them in the standings, the result of this game will reshape the mid - table rankings. Jeju SK is on an upward trajectory. They defeated Jeonbuk Hyundai away in the previous round and have been undefeated for several consecutive rounds. In contrast, Anyang FC's scoring streak was halted as they lost to Daejeon Citizen in their last game. However, in the psychological aspect, Jeju SK may face challenges. They have lost all four of their recent encounters with Anyang FC. The game's outcome will largely be determined by the efficiency of the midfield battle and the ability of the strikers to seize opportunities. Ansan FC is set to play away. The team is known for its strong resilience and excels in rapid attack - defense transitions. Matheus in the front line is the team's core scorer. He
      AH
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC - FC Anyang
    More Tips
    • KFUM Oslo has been in a state where their offensive performance shows both quantity and inefficiency. In their recent five matches, they averaged 12.3 offensive terminations per game, yet their conversion rate was only 11%. On the other hand, Lillestrøm has a much better offensive efficiency. Their offensive termination conversion rate of 15% ranks third in the Norwegian Premier League. In terms of key passes, the success rate of KFUM Oslo is 62%, which is significantly lower than Lillestrøm's 71%, and the difference in the value of forward passes is as high as 1.8. In midfield control, Lillestrøm holds a clear lead with a 61% possession rate and a transition speed of 12.4 meters per minute. In terms of physical exertion, the visiting team, Lillestrøm, runs a total of 118 km during the game and makes 23 high - intensity sprints, 4 more than the home team. Defensively, Lillestrøm outperforms KFUM Oslo across the board. They record 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. In
      AH
      NOR D1 KFUM Oslo - Lillestrom
    • Maryport has shown greater efficiency at the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, outperforming Seinäjoki's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.3, 0.5 higher than the opponent. In terms of the passing network, Maryport is more efficient. Their key - passing success rate is 42%, leading Seinäjoki's 30%. The value of forward passes is 1.8 compared to Seinäjoki's 0.9, posing a greater threat. In midfield control, Maryport also has the upper hand. They average 11 tackles and 8 interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds on average, faster than Seinäjoki. The whole team of Maryport runs a total distance of 112 km and has 45 high - intensity sprints, indicating more abundant physical reserves. Overall, Maryport seems to have more advantages in this game, and their performance is worth looking forward to. Mariehamn shows greater resilience in their defensive system. They average 14 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 7 clearances per game. Their intercept
      AH
      FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - SJK Seinajoen
    • Alavés holds an edge over Getafe in several key offensive metrics. Their attack conversion rate stands at 18.6%, compared to Getafe's 14.3%. The xG efficiency of Alavés is 1.21, while Getafe lags behind at 0.98. In terms of passing in the front - field, Alavés has a higher passing value (4.7) than Getafe's 3.2. The key passing success rate of Alavés is 62%, outperforming Getafe's 51%. In the midfield, Alavés shows more stability. They have a 58% ball - possession rate and a conversion speed of 8.2 times per 90 minutes. Looking at the whole - team performance, Alavés runs more. Their total running distance is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 89 times, both higher than Getafe's figures. On the defensive end, Alavés is also more active. They have 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and 18 clearances, while Getafe only manages 12 clearances. Overall, based on these statistics, Alavés seems to be in a better position in this encounter. I invite you to follow me a
      AH
      SPA D1 Alaves - Getafe
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.