Brann vs Ham-Kam Tips and Predictions AH Mr Well

Norway Eliteserien

Analysis More Tips

Brann

Ham-Kam

Further Reading

(fan) Alex⁸

Brann has had a rather inconsistent season in the Norwegian Premier League. With 7 wins, 1 draw, and 8 losses in 16 matches, they've accumulated 22 points and sit in sixth place. Despite the unstable overall record, their attack has been quite potent, scoring 33 goals, which ranks among the top in the league. In their last league game, Brann defeated Rosenborg 3-2 at home, so they're brimming with confidence. However, Brann is also troubled by injuries. T. Stad has a cruciate ligament injury, S. Opsal has a foot injury, and Nana Boakye has a knee injury. The absence of these three key midfield and forward players will surely affect the team's offense - defense transitions. On the other hand, HamKam currently stands in eighth place with 6 wins, 4 draws, and 6 losses, also amassing 22 points. But their away - game performance is a major weak point. In 8 away games, they've only managed 1 win, 3 draws, and 4 losses, with a dismal win - rate of just 12%. In the last 6 league games, HamKam

AH
NOR D1 Brann - Ham-Kam
Adin Reports

Brann has been in fine form recently, showing a stronger finishing ability. Their offensive conversion rate of 22.3% and xG efficiency of 0.83 are both better than Hankø's 18.1% and 0.71 respectively. In terms of passing, there are significant disparities. Brann's key pass success rate is 76.4%, compared to Hankø's 69.8%. The value of their forward passes is also higher, at 0.45 against Hankø's 0.32. This indicates that Brann can create more threats through precise short - passes. In the midfield, Brann dominates. They have a 62.1% ball - possession rate and a quick counter - attack speed of 1.2 seconds per transition, effectively squeezing Hankø's organizational space. When it comes to physical performance, Brann outshines Hankø. Their total running distance is 112.3km, more than Hankø's 108.7km. They also have 124 high - intensity sprints, compared to Hankø's 109. This continuous pressure is likely to wear down Hankø's defense. Overall, Brann seems to have the upper hand in t

O/U
NOR D1 Brann - Ham-Kam
ShubhammmBhatiii0

Brann currently sits seventh in the league with 22 points from 16 games. Their offensive firepower ranks among the top in the league, having scored a total of 33 goals. The team shows good ability to pick up points at home, winning four out of their last six home matches. They are adept at using wing attacks and high - pressing ball control to dominate opponents. Brann recently won an UEFA Europa Conference League playoff. Key players like Holm and Ingason are in great form, continuously contributing goals for the attacking line. However, the team has obvious weaknesses. Four key players in the back - line and midfield are out injured. This has led to flaws in the defensive coordination, resulting in goals conceded in every game on average and weak defensive stability. In head - to - head encounters, Brann has a significant advantage. They've won six out of the last seven meetings, and in the previous away game, they thrashed the opponent with a 5 - goal victory, giving them a huge psy

AH
NOR D1 Brann - Ham-Kam

More Tips

When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, here is an analysis of the game between Oulu and Turku International. Oulu has been in good offensive form recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, higher than Turku International's 14.2%. The xG efficiency value of Oulu is 1.23, significantly better than Turku International's 0.91. In terms of passing, Oulu's key passing success rate reaches 61%, and the value of their forward - field passes is 23% higher than that of Turku International. Defensively, Oulu has an average of 12.4 midfield interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than Turku. The whole team makes 32 high - intensity sprints per game, and the total running distance exceeds that of Turku by 1.2 kilometers. Oulu also has an average of 15.6 tackles per game, with an interception success rate of 82%, and they make 4.3 more clearances than Turku. I recommend following me to get timely updates and enjoy continuous surpri

AH
FIN D1 AC Oulu - Inter Turku
When comparing the initial opening data with the real - time data, let's analyze the performance of the two teams. Portugal National shows greater offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate is 12% higher than Estoril's. The xG efficiency reaches 1.8, leading by 0.5. The success rate of key passes is 18% better than the opponent's by 23%, and the value of forward - field passes is 35% higher. In terms of midfield control, Portugal National has an average of 14 interceptions per game, and their transition speed has been improved by 20%. The total running distance of the whole team reaches 118 km, and the frequency of high - intensity sprints is 42 times, both of which are better than Estoril. I've got a knack for these analyses. Follow me and set up app notifications to get timely recommendations and continuous pleasant surprises！ Estoril has significant disadvantages in defensive statistics. They only manage 9 tackles per game, and their interception success rate is as low

O/U
POR D1 Nacional da Madeira - Estoril
When comparing the initial odds with the real-time data, the following analysis emerges. Moscow Spartak shows clear offensive superiority. Their full - game offensive conversion rate is 23.6%, better than Batka's 18.2%. The xG efficiency value of 1.85 against Batka's 1.21 further demonstrates this edge. In terms of passing, Moscow Spartak's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Batka by 12 percentage points. They also have a high - value forward - field passing frequency of 4.7 times per 90 minutes. In the midfield, Moscow Spartak has 19 interceptions compared to Batka's 12. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds per play, 0.5 seconds faster than their opponents. The team makes 28 high - intensity sprints and covers a total running distance of 112.3 kilometers, both figures being over 10% higher than Batka. On the defensive end, Moscow Spartak makes 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, effectively blocking Batka's attacks. I've got a knack for in - depth match analysis

AH
RUS PR Baltika Kaliningrad - Spartak Moscow

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Brann VS Ham-Kam