APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
Ayomide ilesanmiWon 6/6Follow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
bensalemWon 4/4Follow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Theé Palmer CGHWon 4/5Follow72.2%Win Rate +36.7%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaWon 13/18Follow70.4%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
The Chicago Fire is in great form, winning multiple games recently. They're highly motivated in the playoff - spot race. At home, their offense is consistent. The midfield has good ball - control and can effectively organize attacks. The wingers' runs create numerous goal - scoring opportunities. However, the defense is troubled by injuries. Some key defenders are unavailable, and the reshuffled backline is less stable. They'll face pressure when dealing with opponents' quick counter - attacks.
The Portland Timbers are on the verge of the Western Conference playoffs, so they're desperate for points. Their attack is fairly potent, mainly relying on wingers' darts and counter - attacks to score. But their away - game performance is inconsistent. There are many defensive flaws on the road, and issues often arise in coordinated defending and covering. Overall, their ability to pick up points away from home is mediocre.
Further Reading
-
amvn Won 3/5I'm a professional analyst with a long - term and stable track record. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my valued followers. In terms of offensive performance, Chicago Fire has a better conversion rate at 18.3%, compared to Portland Timbers' 14.1%. The xG efficiency of Chicago Fire is 1.23, while that of Portland Timbers is only 0.91, which clearly shows the former's superiority in the attacking third. When it comes to passing, Chicago Fire has a key passing success rate of 62%, leading Portland Timbers' 55%. The value of their forward passes is 14.7, more efficient than Portland's 11.3. In midfield control, Chicago Fire has an average of 12.4 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Portland Timbers' 2.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Chicago Fire covers a distance of 112.3 km per game, more than Portland Timbers' 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 43 for Chicago Fire and 37 for PortlanO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
MetaMaskChicago Fire has shown decent form, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches with 3 losses and no draws. However, it's worth noting that two of their victories were achieved at home, indicating a certain home - field advantage. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has won 5, drawn 2 and lost 3 in their last 10 games. The inconsistent performance of Portland Timbers can be attributed to the players' psychological state and form. In previous encounters, Chicago Fire held an edge. But recently, they've had a few lackluster performances. Their defense has been out of sync, which puts them at a disadvantage. Portland Timbers' forwards have been underwhelming, clearly not performing as well as Chicago Fire. Although Chicago Fire has a better win - loss record in the recent 10 - game span, they don't hold a significant advantage in this upcoming match. As the two teams meet again, it remains to be seen which side can maintain a normal level of play and seize the initiative in this game. The ChicO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Iqbal ahmadBoth Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers are struggling with inefficiency in their offensive play. Chicago Fire has a conversion rate of 12.3% in offensive finishes, which is below the league average. Meanwhile, Portland Timbers only manages an xG efficiency of 0.62 per 90 minutes. The key pass success rates of both teams fail to reach 45%, and the value of forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. In midfield control, Chicago Fire holds an average ball possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute, contrasting sharply with Portland Timbers' rapid transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. Chicago Fire covers a running distance of 118 km and has 12 high - intensity sprints, yet their defensive performance is far from satisfactory. Their tackle success rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams are wasting scoring opO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
Telegram
Facebook
X