APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
Ayomide ilesanmiWon 6/6Follow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
bensalemWon 4/4Follow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Theé Palmer CGHWon 4/5Follow72.2%Win Rate +36.7%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaWon 13/18Follow70.4%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ONUKE IFEANYILooking at the head - to - head history between Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers, the two teams have met multiple times in Major League Soccer (MLS) games and friendly matches. In recent encounters, draws have been the norm. In a past MLS game, Chicago Fire managed a 2 - 1 home victory over Portland Timbers, which was their only win in the last three home meetings against this opponent. However, in a club friendly, Chicago Fire lost 3 - 4 at home, indicating some volatility in their defensive performance. In official home games against Portland Timbers, Chicago Fire had a 2 - 2 draw in one match and a 1 - 1 draw in another. The corner - kick statistics are quite telling about their offensive efficiency. In one game, they led with a 7 - 2 corner - kick count, and in another, it was 10 - 5, showing a significant edge in creating offensive opportunities during these matches. Portland Timbers' away records against Chicago show fluctuations. In past away games, they had a 3 - 4 win, a 1 -O/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Only1TobiazChicago Fire has been in excellent form recently, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches and losing 3, without any draws. In their previous game, they put on an outstanding performance. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has also shown good results, with 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses in their last 10 games. However, for this game, they are likely to field substitute or second - string players. This could be to give the main players a rest or to test the team's lineup and tactics. Although Chicago Fire has an edge in terms of their overall strength and historical head - to - head records against Portland Timbers, their advantage in this particular game might not be significant. Portland Timbers, despite being the underdog, has a positive attitude towards this match. Given their recent form and historical dominance in past meetings, the question remains: Will Chicago Fire be able to secure another victory in this encounter? The Chicago Fire shows clear superiority in multiple offensiveO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Liam 665The Chicago Fire and the Portland Timbers both show inefficiency in their offensive ends. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, lower than the league average, while the Timbers' xG efficiency is only 0.62 per 90 minutes. In terms of key passes, neither team has a success rate exceeding 45%. The value of their forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. Regarding midfield control, the Fire have an average ball - possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute. In contrast, the Timbers have a faster transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. In terms of running, the Fire cover a distance of 118 km and have 12 high - intensity sprints. However, in defense, their tackle rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams waste scoring opportunities. Their on - target shooting rate is only 24%, and the total xG is only 1.8AHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
More Tips
-
Looking at the historical head - to - head data between Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps, there's a clear contrast in offensive and defensive transitions. In the last five years of their official encounters, when Chicago Fire played at home, Vancouver Whitecaps had a significant edge in corner kicks. In four meetings, the corner - kick differences were all negative for Chicago Fire (-5, -0, -2, -5). This shows that Vancouver Whitecaps were more proactive and dominant in set - piece situations. For instance, in a game where Chicago Fire lost 0 - 1 at home, Vancouver Whitecaps led by 5 corner kicks. In a 1 - 1 draw, the Whitecaps had a 2 - corner - kick advantage. These results indirectly point out potential weaknesses in Chicago Fire's home - defense, especially in aerial duels and defending on the flanks. Vancouver Whitecaps' corner - kick data shows an opposite trend when playing away. In their last four away games, the corner - kick differences were all negative (-6, -4, -6, -3).AHMLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X