APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
Ayomide ilesanmiWon 6/6Follow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
bensalemWon 4/4Follow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Theé Palmer CGHWon 4/5Follow72.2%Win Rate +36.7%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaWon 13/18Follow70.4%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ONUKE IFEANYILooking at the head - to - head history between Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers, the two teams have met multiple times in Major League Soccer (MLS) games and friendly matches. In recent encounters, draws have been the norm. In a past MLS game, Chicago Fire managed a 2 - 1 home victory over Portland Timbers, which was their only win in the last three home meetings against this opponent. However, in a club friendly, Chicago Fire lost 3 - 4 at home, indicating some volatility in their defensive performance. In official home games against Portland Timbers, Chicago Fire had a 2 - 2 draw in one match and a 1 - 1 draw in another. The corner - kick statistics are quite telling about their offensive efficiency. In one game, they led with a 7 - 2 corner - kick count, and in another, it was 10 - 5, showing a significant edge in creating offensive opportunities during these matches. Portland Timbers' away records against Chicago show fluctuations. In past away games, they had a 3 - 4 win, a 1 -O/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Janan💚In this Major League Soccer encounter, Chicago Fire shows a clear edge over Portland Timbers in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Chicago Fire's conversion rate of 12.3% is superior to Portland Timbers' 9.8%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency for Chicago Fire stands at 1.82, while Portland Timbers only manages 1.21. When it comes to key passing success in the attacking third, Chicago Fire leads with a 67% success rate, compared to Portland Timbers' 58%. The value of their attacking passes is also more threatening, with Chicago Fire recording 14.2 against Portland Timbers' 9.6. In midfield control, Chicago Fire has a significant advantage. They average 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game, which is 20% more than Portland Timbers. Regarding running statistics, Chicago Fire covers 112.3 km throughout the game and has 47 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than Portland Timbers' 108.1 km and 39 sprints respectively. Based on these data, Chicago FireAHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Win bets Won 9/12Chicago Fire has shown a strong performance at home this season. In their last five home games, they achieved four wins and one loss, boasting an 80% win - rate. They scored an average of 2 goals per game and conceded 6 in total over these 5 games, with a positive goal difference of 4. The team is efficient at both ends of the pitch. They average 5.09 corner kicks per game, which reflects their stable tactical execution. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has been struggling on the road. In their last five away matches, they only managed one win, one draw and three losses, resulting in a win - rate of just 25%. They conceded as many as 8 goals, indicating obvious weaknesses in their defense. In their head - to - head encounters this season, Chicago Fire held a clear advantage at home. A data comparison shows that both teams have similar offensive firepower. Chicago Fire scores 2.0 goals per game at home, the same as Portland Timbers' average away goals. However, there is a significantO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X