APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Marcelino Deryl ManongkoFollow77.8%Win Rate +39.1%ROI 28Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
2
BiziWon 7/7Follow76.5%Win Rate +41.9%ROI 18Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
Ðan🦨Follow75.9%Win Rate +27%ROI 31Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
4
Nikhil KumarFollow75%Win Rate +37.4%ROI 16Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Light of your world 🔥Won 5/6Follow75%Win Rate +35.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
6
えめるいWon 4/4Follow75%Win Rate +33.8%ROI 13Tips 1.95Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ICEKHIDIn their head-to-head encounters, the comparison of corner kick statistics between Reading and Wycombe Wanderers has become a key focus for this match. Reading has a record of three wins and one loss in their last four home games against Wycombe. Their wins include a 3 - 2 victory, a 1 - 0 win, and another 1 - 0 win, while the loss was 1 - 2. However, Reading's corner kick data at home has been highly inconsistent. In one game, Reading only got 1 corner kick while Wycombe had 8. In another, the corner kick count was 4 - 9 in favor of Wycombe. There was also a game where the count was 2 - 1, and one where Reading had 9 to Wycombe's 5. This inconsistency indicates significant fluctuations in Reading's efficiency in set - piece attacks at home. They need to improve their cross - passing from the flanks and ball - control organization in these situations. Wycombe Wanderers have a significant edge in corner kicks in their six away encounters against Reading. They had 8 corners in one away gAH
EFL Trophy
Reading
1-1 Wycombe Wanderers
-
amvn Won 9/9I'm a well - known expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for dedicated fans. Let's look at the performance of Reading and Wycombe. Reading has an 18% offensive conversion rate, which is higher than Wycombe's 14%. However, Wycombe has an xG efficiency that is 0.3 higher. In passing, Wycombe shows superiority. Their key pass success rate stands at 62%, leading the way. The value of their forward passes is 1.8, compared to Reading's 1.2. In midfield control, Wycombe holds 61% while Reading has 54%. Also, Wycombe's transition speed is 1.2 seconds faster. When it comes to physical performance, Reading runs 118 km in a game, more than Wycombe's 112 km. But Wycombe has 15 more high - intensity sprints.AHEFL Trophy
Reading
1-1 Wycombe Wanderers
-
Kombo Jnr.In terms of historical head - to - head records, Reading holds a significant edge over Wycombe Wanderers. Reading has won all of their last three home games against Wycombe Wanderers. The specific results were 3 - 2, 1 - 0, and a 1 - 2 win for Reading as the home team. Looking at the offensive and defensive efficiency, Reading has been impressive at home. In their last three home games, they've averaged 2.3 goals per game while conceding only 1.3 goals, showing a stable offensive ability. On the other hand, Wycombe Wanderers' away form has been quite inconsistent. In their last three away games against Reading, they only managed one win (a 1 - 2 victory) and lost the other two. Their away - game defense also shows obvious weaknesses. Considering these factors, Reading seems well - positioned to secure a favorable result in this home encounter. Corner kick statistics further confirm the tactical differences between the two teams. Reading has consistently had a low number of corner kicksAHEFL Trophy
Reading
1-1 Wycombe Wanderers
EFL Trophy
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X