APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Nicey SenseiFollow85.7%Win Rate +64.3%ROI 23Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
Lee HongWon 15/15Follow84%Win Rate +57.2%ROI 25Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow83.3%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 13Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
bensalemWon 4/4Follow83.3%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 12Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
Logan WinchesterFollow78.9%Win Rate +39%ROI 22Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
6
Marcelino Deryl ManongkoWon 10/12Follow78.3%Win Rate +38.6%ROI 24Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Eldy FebriansyahThe historical head - to - head records between FC Rubin Kazan and FC Spartak Moscow reveal their tactical characteristics and offensive - defensive efficiency. Looking back at their recent encounters, in a club friendly, Moscow Spartak played to a goalless draw away against Kazan Rubin, yet they dominated in corner kicks with a 7 - 2 lead. In a Russian Premier League match, Moscow Spartak defeated Kazan Rubin 2 - 1 on the road, also leading in corner kicks 6 - 3. In another Russian Premier League game, Kazan Rubin lost 0 - 2 at home. The 4 - 3 corner - kick count indicated that the away team, Moscow Spartak, had more ball possession. It's worth noting that although Kazan Rubin won 2 - 1 at home once, the 1 - 9 corner - kick data showed their low efficiency in creating threats in the attacking third. Moreover, Moscow Spartak won 3 - 1 away, and even though they had fewer corner kicks (3 - 6), they still maintained an advantage in corner kicks in away games. These historical records canO/U
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
0-0
Spartak Moscow
-
amvn Won 10/13I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. This analysis is tailored for dedicated fans and serious bettors. In terms of offensive efficiency, Rubin Kazan has a lower conversion rate of 18%, while Spartak Moscow boasts a 24% conversion rate. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Spartak Moscow, with 1.8 compared to Rubin Kazan's 1.2. When it comes to passing, Spartak Moscow shows superiority. Their key passing success rate stands at 62%, leading Rubin Kazan's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.3, higher than the 0.9 of the home team. Defensively, although Rubin Kazan has more midfield interceptions (12 times compared to 9), Spartak Moscow shines in terms of tackles. They made 15 tackles, significantly more than the 8 of the home side. In terms of physical performance, the away team, Spartak Moscow, has more high - intensity sprints, with 11 compared to the home team's 7. Their running distanceAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
0-0
Spartak Moscow
48 -
Iqbal ahmadI'm a professional analyst with a team, and we conduct in - depth analysis of selected matches daily. Krasnodar has shown superiority in several key offensive aspects compared to Spartak Moscow. Krasnodar's offensive conversion rate is 12% higher. They also have 1.8 more valuable forward passes per 90 minutes and a 7 - percentage - point lead in key pass success rate. As the home team, Krasnodar dominates midfield control, with a rate reaching 58%. They have a faster transition speed, run 4.2 kilometers more in the whole game, and have 15 more high - intensity sprints. On the other hand, Spartak Moscow, as the away team, has underperformed in the defensive department. Their statistics for tackles and interceptions are below the league average. With only 12 clearances, they rank among the bottom in the Russian Premier League. Kazan Rubin has been in good form on the offensive end, creating 2.3 expected goals (xG) opportunities and boasting a conversion rate of scoring chances as high asO/URUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
0-0
Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X