APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Eldy Febriansyah
659
Articles
0
Like
2
Follower
43.9%
Win Rate
-16.2%
ROI
41
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Nicey SenseiWon 16/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
amvnI'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. This analysis is tailored for dedicated fans and serious bettors. In terms of offensive efficiency, Rubin Kazan has a lower conversion rate of 18%, while Spartak Moscow boasts a 24% conversion rate. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Spartak Moscow, with 1.8 compared to Rubin Kazan's 1.2. When it comes to passing, Spartak Moscow shows superiority. Their key passing success rate stands at 62%, leading Rubin Kazan's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.3, higher than the 0.9 of the home team. Defensively, although Rubin Kazan has more midfield interceptions (12 times compared to 9), Spartak Moscow shines in terms of tackles. They made 15 tackles, significantly more than the 8 of the home side. In terms of physical performance, the away team, Spartak Moscow, has more high - intensity sprints, with 11 compared to the home team's 7. Their running distanceAH
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Big StrongbullKazan Rubin has shown distinct characteristics in their recent matches in terms of offense and defense. In their last five official games, they achieved a record of 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. Their 5-0 win against Rodina Moscow in an away Russian Cup game demonstrated their offensive efficiency. Leading 1-0 at halftime and maintaining a 5-0 victory throughout the game, they showed a high ability to convert opportunities. However, their 1-3 home loss to Krasnodar exposed some defensive vulnerabilities. Yet, the 1-1 draws against Rostov and Orenburg Gazovik at home indicated their consistent competitiveness on their home turf. In terms of corner - kick data, their 7-1 home win over Orenburg and 5-2 away win against Rodina Moscow highlighted their active involvement in wing attacks and control of the ball - possession rhythm. This data could be a crucial support for the team's tactical execution. In recent friendly matches, a 2-0 home win over Sovetskiy Soyuz and a 1-2 home loss to OrenbAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Iqbal ahmadI'm a professional analyst with a team, and we conduct in - depth analysis of selected matches daily. Krasnodar has shown superiority in several key offensive aspects compared to Spartak Moscow. Krasnodar's offensive conversion rate is 12% higher. They also have 1.8 more valuable forward passes per 90 minutes and a 7 - percentage - point lead in key pass success rate. As the home team, Krasnodar dominates midfield control, with a rate reaching 58%. They have a faster transition speed, run 4.2 kilometers more in the whole game, and have 15 more high - intensity sprints. On the other hand, Spartak Moscow, as the away team, has underperformed in the defensive department. Their statistics for tackles and interceptions are below the league average. With only 12 clearances, they rank among the bottom in the Russian Premier League. Kazan Rubin has been in good form on the offensive end, creating 2.3 expected goals (xG) opportunities and boasting a conversion rate of scoring chances as high asO/URUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X