APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Nicey SenseiWon 16/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
freekbassKazan Rubin shows clear offensive superiority over Spartak Moscow. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, better than Spartak Moscow's 14.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 to 0.93 further emphasizes their edge in the attacking end. In terms of passing, Kazan Rubin's key pass success rate is 62%, leading Spartak Moscow's 55%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.83 compared to 1.35 of their opponents, posing a greater threat. The midfield possession rate gap, with Kazan Rubin holding 58% and Spartak Moscow at 42%, reflects their control of the game rhythm. Their average transition speed is 12.7 seconds, faster than Spartak Moscow's 15.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total team running distance of Kazan Rubin is 112.3 km, 2.6 km more than their opponents. The high - intensity sprint count of 23 to 18 also shows their better physical reserves. Overall, considering these aspects, Kazan Rubin has a strong chance in the game. Moscow Spartak is exAH
RUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Pi314Kazan Rubin shows strong offensive capabilities. Their overall offensive conversion rate reaches 28%, significantly higher than Spartak Moscow's 19%. Their xG efficiency value is 1.8, leading the opponent by 0.5. In terms of passing in the front - field, Kazan Rubin has a passing value of 7.2 times per 90 minutes, and their key passing success rate is 64%, better than the away team's 51%. In the midfield, they have 12 interceptions, 3 more than the opponent, and they've managed to shorten the transition speed by an average of 1.2 seconds. The whole team runs 112 kilometers in total and makes 32 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than those of the opponent. On the defensive end, they have 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances, forming an effective defensive line. I invite you to follow me and join the core group to get more in - depth analysis！ Kazan Rubin's offensive system has shown greater efficiency. They have a high shot - on - target rate of 42% and a higAHRUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
-
Eldy FebriansyahThe historical head - to - head records between FC Rubin Kazan and FC Spartak Moscow reveal their tactical characteristics and offensive - defensive efficiency. Looking back at their recent encounters, in a club friendly, Moscow Spartak played to a goalless draw away against Kazan Rubin, yet they dominated in corner kicks with a 7 - 2 lead. In a Russian Premier League match, Moscow Spartak defeated Kazan Rubin 2 - 1 on the road, also leading in corner kicks 6 - 3. In another Russian Premier League game, Kazan Rubin lost 0 - 2 at home. The 4 - 3 corner - kick count indicated that the away team, Moscow Spartak, had more ball possession. It's worth noting that although Kazan Rubin won 2 - 1 at home once, the 1 - 9 corner - kick data showed their low efficiency in creating threats in the attacking third. Moreover, Moscow Spartak won 3 - 1 away, and even though they had fewer corner kicks (3 - 6), they still maintained an advantage in corner kicks in away games. These historical records canO/URUS Cup
Rubin Kazan
1-1 Spartak Moscow
RUS Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X