APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Nicey SenseiWon 16/19Follow79.2%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
4
Lee HongWon 15/17Follow78.3%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow76.5%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 38Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
bensalemWon 10/13Follow75%Win Rate +32.8%ROI 16Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ましゅまろOrlando City is in excellent form. In their recent head - to - head encounters, the results have been fairly even, but Orlando City holds a certain edge in the historical matchups. The forwards of Chicago Fire are relatively weak, and their performance pales in comparison to Orlando City. Orlando City has good offensive ability and can usually score in each game, showing a strong performance on the offensive end. On the other hand, Chicago Fire has had a poor record recently due to player injuries. Given Orlando City's current form and offensive strength, they definitely have the opportunity to win this game. The question is: Can Orlando City stop Chicago Fire's progress in this match? Orlando City has been in good form recently, showing a certain goal - scoring ability. In their previous encounters, Orlando City held a clear advantage. Although both teams are currently experiencing a period of fluctuating form, Orlando City has been more stable in recent games. On the other hand, ChicO/U
MLS
Orlando City
1-2 Chicago Fire
-
Andie PeciOrlando City has shown a significant improvement in their offensive efficiency recently. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks stands at 14.2%, which is higher than Chicago Fire's 9.8%. Moreover, their expected goals efficiency (xG/attack end) leads by 0.18. In terms of key passing success rate, Orlando City achieves 76.4%, and the value of their forward passes per 90 minutes is 12.3, significantly better than Chicago Fire's 68.1% and 8.9 respectively. When it comes to midfield control, Orlando City maintains a stable ball - possession rate of 58%. Their short - pass success rate is 89.4%, and their transition speed is 17.2 meters per minute, faster than Chicago Fire's 13.4 meters. In running statistics, Orlando City has an average of 112 high - intensity sprints per game, 23 more than their opponents, indicating better physical energy allocation. So, how should we interpret the outcome of this match? I'm here to provide professional football analysis. Follow me to keep track ofO/UMLS
Orlando City
1-2 Chicago Fire
-
Gollll Won 5/8Orlando City's recent home performances have shown significant fluctuations. In their last five home games, the team's corner - kick statistics varied greatly. Against Cincinnati, they had an advantage with a 10 - 5 corner - kick ratio. However, in the draw against Saint Louis City SC, they only managed 3 corners. When they won against Nashville SC, they were at a disadvantage with a 2 - 7 corner - kick record. In a big 4 - 1 home victory over Atlanta United, they had a 7 - 1 corner - kick lead, but in a 1 - 1 draw against the same opponent, they were behind with a 4 - 10 ratio. Overall, Orlando City's home offensive and defensive efficiency has fluctuated widely. In the last five home matches, they had 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. On the offensive end, they averaged 1.6 goals per game, while on the defensive end, they conceded an average of 1.4 goals per game. In terms of corner - kick control, they average around 6.4 corners per home game, but often find themselves at a disadvantageO/UMLS
Orlando City
1-2 Chicago Fire
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X