APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
SPORT249Won 9/9Follow90%Win Rate +19.9%ROI 11Tips 1.44Avg Odds -
2
Kon kha laFollow88.9%Win Rate +61.7%ROI 10Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
3
Tobi SageWon 6/6Follow81.8%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 12Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
EkayaFollow80%Win Rate +41.7%ROI 20Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
ZyDONNN😎Follow80%Win Rate +40.2%ROI 15Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
6
xuxusammiWon 5/6Follow80%Win Rate +47.2%ROI 11Tips 1.85Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
CouprieJRAtlanta's recent form has shown a significant disparity between attack and defense. In an away game, they thrashed Schalke 04 3 - 0. The corner - kick statistics of 12 to 2 clearly demonstrated their dominant ball - possession. However, in a home game against Athletic Bilbao, they only managed a narrow 1 - 0 victory, and the corner - kick ratio of 1 to 4 revealed obvious weaknesses in their defensive end. During the Serie A season, there was a stark contrast between a 0 - 0 home draw against Genoa (with a corner - kick ratio of 6 - 2) and a 0 - 1 away loss to Bologna (corner - kick ratio 2 - 5). This indicates that the team urgently needs to improve the balance between attack and defense. In the Italian Cup, although they only managed a 1 - 1 home draw against Lazio (corner - kick ratio 6 - 5), their attacking end was constantly productive, and the corner - kick data reflected their threat from set - pieces. On the other hand, Maccabi Tel Aviv has been more stable in the UEFA Europa CoAH
UEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0
Hapoel Tel Aviv
-
JJ BEDDINGSAtlanta shows a clear edge over Maccabi Tel Aviv in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion, Atlanta's full - field offensive end conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly better than Maccabi Tel Aviv's 12.7%. The xG efficiency value also favors Atlanta, with 1.2 compared to Maccabi Tel Aviv's 0.7. When it comes to passing, Atlanta has a key passing success rate of 61%, while Maccabi Tel Aviv only manages 49%. The value of front - court passes, 1.8 for Atlanta and 1.1 for Maccabi Tel Aviv, highlights Atlanta's superior ball - control quality. In midfield battles, Atlanta has a higher number of interceptions, 14 compared to 9. Their transition speed is also more efficient, taking 1.3 seconds compared to Maccabi Tel Aviv's 1.7 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Atlanta covers a running distance of 112 km, far more than Maccabi Tel Aviv's 1.4 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 42 for Atlanta and 28 for Maccabi Tel Aviv, further demonstrates their physicalAHUEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0
Hapoel Tel Aviv
-
amvnI'm a well - established expert in sports analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights tailored for dedicated fans. In terms of offensive efficiency, Atlanta has a clear edge. Its offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly better than Tel Aviv Hapoel's 12.7%. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Atlanta, with 1.2 compared to Tel Aviv Hapoel's 0.8. When it comes to key passes, Atlanta's success rate is 62%, leading Tel Aviv Hapoel's 49%. The value of forward passes is also more efficient for Atlanta, at 11.7 compared to 8.3. In midfield control, Atlanta maintains a 58% possession rate, supported by 62 successful interceptions. Its transition speed of 1.8 times per minute is faster than Tel Aviv Hapoel's 1.3 times. In terms of physical performance, Atlanta runs 112 km, 7 km more than Tel Aviv Hapoel. And the number of high - intensity sprints, 32 to 24, shows that Atlanta has better physical reserves.AHUEFA ECL
Atalanta
0-0
Hapoel Tel Aviv
48
UEFA ECL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X