APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
SPORT249Won 9/9Follow90%Win Rate +19.9%ROI 12Tips 1.49Avg Odds -
2
えめるいWon 4/4Follow80%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
88SOCCERWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +13.7%ROI 10Tips 1.41Avg Odds -
4
ZyDONNN😎Follow78.6%Win Rate +36.5%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
peter habakkukFollow77.1%Win Rate +32.9%ROI 39Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
6
Football 24/7Follow76.5%Win Rate +38.5%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Adin ReportsTromsø and Brighton have distinct characteristics in various aspects of the game. In attack, Tromsø's finishing conversion rate is 12.3%, lower than Brighton's 15.8%. However, Tromsø's forward - passing value is 1.27, higher than Brighton's 1.12. And Tromsø's key - pass success rate is 48%, better than Brighton's 55%. In the midfield, Brighton has a clear edge. Their ball - possession rate is 62%, and their conversion speed is 1.8 times per minute, faster than Tromsø's 1.3 times. Also, Brighton makes 12 high - intensity sprints, more than Tromsø's 9 times. On the defensive end, Brighton outperforms Tromsø. They have 14 tackles and 9 interceptions, while Tromsø only has 9 tackles and 6 interceptions. The clearance data of the two teams is the same. In terms of expected goals, Tromsø's xG is 0.74, lower than Brighton's 1.12. But Tromsø's offensive efficiency is 82%, higher than Brighton's 74%. In terms of running statistics, Brighton runs a total distance of 118 km, more than TO/U
UEFA ECL
Tromso IL
0-0 Brighton Hove Albion
-
amvn Won 5/5I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing record of stable and high - quality information. I've tailored a long - term, high - quality product for big players. Tromsø has an average of 4.2 shots on target per game in the last 5 matches, with a conversion rate of 18.3%, which is better than Brighton's 15.7%. However, Brighton has an xG value 0.45 higher. Brighton leads in the key pass success rate at 68% and has a front - field passing value of 12.7 times per 90 minutes. In terms of midfield interceptions, Tromsø has 12.3 times per game, while Brighton averages 14.1 times, showing stronger control. Brighton covers a running distance of 118.6 km and has 12 more high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, Tromsø has 15.2 clearances per game, but Brighton's 13.4 tackles per game are more effective. In the offensive aspect, Brighton has 18.7 offensive finishes per game compared to Tromsø's 16.1, and the scoring opportunity conversion rates are 19.2% and 16.8% respectively.O/UUEFA ECL
Tromso IL
0-0 Brighton Hove Albion
-
JJ BEDDINGSBrighton has shown clear superiority over Tromsø in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Tromsø's offensive conversion rate is 12%, lower than Brighton's 18%. The xG value of 0.8 for Tromsø compared to 1.4 for Brighton also indicates a disadvantage in offensive efficiency. Regarding passing, Brighton's key - pass success rate is 62%, significantly higher than Tromsø's 45%. The passing value in the front - field, 12.3 for Brighton and 7.1 for Tromsø, reflects Brighton's dominance in ball control. In midfield, Brighton has 14 interceptions, more than Tromsø's 9. The average transition speed of 1.8 seconds for Brighton is faster than Tromsø's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Brighton runs 118 km in the whole game with 43 high - intensity sprints, while Tromsø runs 109 km and has 29 high - intensity sprints. In defensive actions, Brighton has 11 tackles, 18 interceptions and 6 clearances, compared to Tromsø's 7 tackles, 10 interceptions and 3 clearanceO/UUEFA ECL
Tromso IL
0-0 Brighton Hove Albion
UEFA ECL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X