APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Ingram⚪🔴Follow87.5%Win Rate +55.2%ROI 18Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
2
mata jalyWon 4/4Follow84.2%Win Rate +37.7%ROI 19Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
3
PhilegrayFollow79.3%Win Rate +30%ROI 29Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
4
MTASHEWon 11/13Follow78.9%Win Rate +46%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
Loyal08Won 4/4Follow77.8%Win Rate +42.4%ROI 20Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
6
OssOssOssFollow77.8%Win Rate +37.6%ROI 19Tips 1.88Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Olusegun10Austin, playing at home in this MLS game, adopts a 4 - 3 - 3 formation. They have an average home - field ball possession rate of 51% and a passing success rate of 80%. On average, they complete 12 shots per game. They rely on front - court pressing to drive flanking attacks. Their main scoring methods are through flank penetrations and second - phase attacks from corner kicks. The home - team's offensive output is stable. However, their full - backs tend to advance significantly, leaving obvious gaps behind them. They face great pressure when covering for counter - attacks with speed. On the other hand, Philadelphia Union plays a 3 - 4 - 2 - 1 three - center - back system in away games. They hold the ball for about 45% of the time on the road. Their wing - backs have strong running ability and are good at midfield interceptions to initiate counter - attacks. Nevertheless, the stability of their away - game defense is inconsistent. The flanks of their defense can easily be stretched reO/U
MLS
Austin FC
1-1 Philadelphia Union
-
Pi314In this Major League Soccer encounter, Austin FC shows clear advantages over Philadelphia Union in multiple aspects. When it comes to offensive efficiency, Austin FC has a 12% higher offensive conversion rate. Their xG efficiency stands at 0.82, significantly better than Philadelphia Union's 0.55. In passing data, Austin FC leads with a 68% success rate of key passes. The value of their forward passes is 1.23, superior to Philadelphia Union's 0.91. In midfield control, Austin FC has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a faster transition speed. They cover a running distance of 112 km with 32 high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. Overall, Austin FC seems to be in a more favorable position in this game. I invite you to follow me and join the core group for more in - depth analysis. Austin FC has shown remarkable strength in the defensive end. They have made 15 tackles and 12 interceptions, with a clearance efficiency of 89%. In contrast, Philadelphia UnioAHMLS
Austin FC
1-1 Philadelphia Union
-
u cant ansI've conducted in - depth research on this match. In terms of offensive efficiency, Philadelphia Union has shown better results. Their average offensive conversion rate is 18.2%, while Austin FC's is only 14.4%. The xG efficiency value of Philadelphia Union is 1.2, which is more advantageous than Austin FC's 0.8. When it comes to passing data, Philadelphia Union also takes the lead. Their key passing success rate is 42%, compared to Austin FC's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes reaches 8.7 points per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Philadelphia Union has an average of 12.3 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, faster than Austin FC's 2.4 seconds. Looking at the running statistics, the whole team of Philadelphia Union runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 23 high - intensity sprints per game. These are higher than Austin FC's 10.8 kilometers and 18 sprints. Overall, Philadelphia Union seems to have an edge in multiple aspecAHMLS
Austin FC
1-1 Philadelphia Union
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X