APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Mbah_tipsterFollow90.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 11Tips 1.77Avg Odds -
2
Ingram⚪🔴Won 9/9Follow88.9%Win Rate +56.4%ROI 20Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
3
mata jalyWon 6/7Follow81.8%Win Rate +34.6%ROI 22Tips 1.75Avg Odds -
4
PhilegrayWon 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +31.6%ROI 30Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
5
OssOssOssWon 9/10Follow78.9%Win Rate +41%ROI 20Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
haappyjqFollow77.3%Win Rate +39.8%ROI 22Tips 1.89Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Tomiwaaaa33The host team has a fast offensive tempo in recent home games. In the last three home games, the average number of offensive possessions per game reached 18, with an average duration of 25 seconds per attack, 3 seconds faster than away games. In the last three games, they created 4 shooting opportunities through quick attacks. On the other hand, the away team is good at slowing down the opponent's offensive tempo when defending away. In the last four away games, they have increased the average duration of the opponent's offensive possessions by 5 seconds per game. The back - line players complete an average of 9 tactical fouls per game, effectively disrupting the opponent's offensive rhythm. In the last three games, they have prevented the opponent from scoring through quick attacks. The contrasting characteristics of the two teams in offensive tempo and defensive delay are likely to have a significant impact on the game's progress. River Plate's recent form is a cause for concern. StaAH
ARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
El CapitanIn comparing the offensive and defensive data between River Plate and Sarmiento, River Plate shows an edge in offensive conversion rate, with 18.2% compared to Sarmiento's 14.4%. However, Sarmiento is more efficient in xG, with a value of 1.2 against River Plate's 0.9. In terms of key passes, River Plate has a significant advantage. Its key pass success rate stands at 67%, notably higher than Sarmiento's 52%. Also, River Plate leads in the value of forward passes, with a figure of 3.8 compared to Sarmiento's 2.4. Defensively, Sarmiento outperforms River Plate in midfield interceptions. Sarmiento has 12 interceptions, while River Plate only manages 8. But when it comes to physical performance, River Plate takes the lead. The team covers a total running distance of 118km and records 42 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Sarmiento. Sarmiento has had a poor run in their last four home matches in the Argentine Primera División, with a record of just 1 win and 3 losses. TheyAHARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
-
Pi314River Plate has shown a dominant performance in recent matches. In the last five games, River Plate averaged 18.2 offensive terminations per game, with a conversion rate of 12.3%, which is significantly better than Sarsfield's 9.8%. In terms of xG efficiency, River Plate reached 1.82, while Sarsfield only managed 1.35. The key pass success rate also favors River Plate, at 42% compared to Sarsfield's 35%. The value of forward passes for River Plate is 1.72, 35% higher than Sarsfield's 1.28. When it comes to midfield control, River Plate averages 14.6 tackles and 9.2 interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds per possession, superior to Sarsfield's 2.3 seconds. In terms of running distance, River Plate covers 118.3 km per game, more than Sarsfield's 109.4 km. The number of high - intensity sprints for River Plate is 58 times, 33% more than Sarsfield's 42 times. On the defensive end, River Plate makes 12.4 clearances per game, while Sarsfield only makes 9.1. Overall, RiAHARG D1
River Plate
2-2 Velez Sarsfield
ARG D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X