APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Bologna VS Lazio

    Italy Serie A
    Analysis More Tips
    Bologna
    Bologna
    Lazio
    Lazio
    Further Reading
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Bologna has had a rather mediocre home record this season. In 19 home games, they only managed 6 wins, 4 draws, and 9 losses. They scored 19 goals and conceded 23, with a goal difference of -4 and a win rate of 31.6%, ranking low in the league's home standings. On the contrary, Bologna has shown significant advantages away from home. In 19 away games, they achieved 10 wins, 4 draws, and 5 losses, scoring 30 goals while conceding only 23. With a goal difference of +7 and a win rate of 52.6%, they currently rank fourth in the Serie A away standings. This stark contrast in home and away performances highlights Bologna's outstanding tactical execution and defensive organization on the road. In terms of recent form, Bologna has 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses in their last 6 games, scoring 7 goals and conceding 9, with a goal difference of -2 and a win rate of 33.3%. Although their form has fluctuated, their attack has still shown stability. In particular, their efficient away - game offense
      O/U
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    • Only1Tobiaz
      Only1Tobiaz
      Bologna has shown a balanced performance in attack and defense this season. With a win rate of 50%, a draw rate of 20%, and a loss rate of 30%, the team scores 1.7 goals per game on average, while conceding the same number, resulting in a zero goal difference. This data indicates that the team has a certain offensive firepower, but the lack of defensive stability leads to the equal number of goals scored and conceded. Bologna's average of only 2.29 corner - kicks per game ranks among the bottom in the league, suggesting that its offensive system has limited ability to create threats on the flanks. Moreover, an average of 0.7 yellow cards per game shows that their tactical execution is relatively restrained, which may affect the intensity of high - pressure pressing. On the other hand, Lazio has demonstrated a higher offensive and defensive efficiency. They have a high win rate of 60% without any draws and a loss rate of 40%. In attack, they score 1.8 goals per game on average, while co
      AH
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    • Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠
      Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠
      Bologna's recent form has been quite inconsistent. In friendly matches, they've had a mix of wins and losses. Although they managed to string together consecutive victories against strong opponents like Roma and Inter Milan towards the end of last season, their overall stability is lacking. Their home performances have also been up and down, and in their last three home games against Lazio, they've only managed 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss. On the other hand, Lazio is facing a serious injury crisis. Nine players are out due to injuries, including several defenders and a midfield core. This has significantly thinned out their squad, directly affecting the consistency of their tactical execution. As a result, their defensive capabilities and midfield control have notably declined. In terms of tactics, Bologna likes to control the ball and launch attacks from the left - wing. However, frequent individual mistakes make their defense vulnerable. Lazio, meanwhile, excels at through - balls and
      AH
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    More Tips
    • Both Kuruvchi Kokon and Bukhara have shown sub - par offensive performances recently. Their offensive conversion rates are lower than the league average, with Kuruvchi at 11.3% and Bukhara at 9.8%. The combined xG value is only 2.1, which clearly indicates inefficiency in the attacking third. In terms of key pass success rates, Kuruvchi stands at 68% while Bukhara is at 65%. The value of forward passes is 0.43 for Kuruvchi and 0.39 for Bukhara, suggesting a marginal difference between the two teams. However, both teams suffer from a lack of midfield control. Their counter - attack speed is sluggish, with an average half - time sprint distance of only 9.2 km and a high - intensity running proportion of less than 15%. I believe that only with careful analysis and sincere recommendations can we achieve long - term success in this field. The defensive statistics of this match highlight its intensity. Kuruvchi Kokan averages 14.2 tackles per game, ranking third in the league, and Bokhtar ha
      O/U
      UZB D1 Kuruvchi Kokand Qoqon - Buxoro FK
    • Both Botoșani and FK Miercurea Ciuc have relatively low offensive efficiency in the league. Their offensive conversion rates this season are only 11.2% and 9.8% respectively, far below the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, neither team has exceeded the 65% mark. Their Passing Attack Value (PA.V) in the front - field is only 0.32 and 0.28 respectively, indicating a lack of ability to create substantial threats. In midfield control, there is an obvious balance. The difference in the average number of times of regaining the ball per game (SPR) between the two teams is within 5 times. Their Conversion Possession Index (CPI) is both below 0.45, showing a lack of momentum for quick offense - defense transitions. Running data reveals a lack of high - intensity confrontation. The total average high - intensity running distance (HID) per game of both teams is less than 90 kilometers, 12% lower than the league average. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Botosani - FK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
    • Malmo has been in good form recently, with an average offensive conversion rate of 18.2%, higher than Örgryte's 15.7%. In addition, their expected goals (xG) values this season are 1.8 and 1.6 respectively. Malmo also leads in key pass success rate at 82%, 8% higher than Örgryte. The value of Malmo's forward passes reaches 0.45 per pass, while Örgryte's is 0.38. In terms of midfield control, Malmo regains possession of the ball 15.3 times per game on average, compared to Örgryte's 13.1 times. However, Örgryte has a faster counter - attack speed, with an average counter - attack time of only 9.2 seconds. Both teams have run over 110 kilometers in the last 5 games, and the total number of high - intensity sprints per game reaches 42, indicating a fast - paced game. I believe that only by making careful and dedicated predictions can we achieve long - term development. Malmo shows a defensive style that leans towards proactive interception. Their defensive data reveals an average of 1
      O/U
      SWE D1 Malmo FF - Djurgardens
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.