APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Osasuna VS Levante

    Spanish La Liga
    Analysis More Tips
    Osasuna
    Osasuna
    Levante
    Levante
    Further Reading
    • Emile Smith Rowe
      Emile Smith Rowe
      In historical head - to - head encounters, the data between Osasuna and Levante in La Liga shows distinct differences. In one match, Levante triumphed 3 - 2 at home, with a 2 - 2 draw at halftime. A striking 15 - 1 corner kick disparity highlighted the home team's offensive firepower. On the other hand, Osasuna achieved a 2 - 0 victory at home, leading 2 - 0 at halftime. The 3 - 3 corner kick result demonstrated their solid defense and effective counter - attacks. In the last five meetings, Osasuna remained unbeaten at home (2 wins and 1 draw), while Levante had 1 win and 2 losses on the road. In terms of offensive and defensive efficiency, Osasuna averages 1.8 goals per game at home this season, and Levante has an away goal - conceding rate as high as 52%. However, Levante's offense has shown signs of recovery, scoring 3 goals in the last league game. Regarding corner kicks, Levante has a clear advantage at home (such as the 15 - 1 result), and Osasuna also performs well in generating
      O/U
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    • Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Aykut Tırmıkçı
      Osauna adopts a balanced and pragmatic style in positional attacks and defenses. Their formation is well - arranged. In the midfield, they are good at rhythm control and building defensive barriers, with a balanced offensive - defensive ratio. Their performance on the field is quite stable. The team has excellent detail control. In the last five games, they averaged 9.5 defensive blocks and 2.1 unforced errors per game. They are very reliable in controlling the situation during long - term stalemates. However, Osauna lacks individual breakthrough ability in the front - field. They rarely have moments to break the deadlock instantly. When facing a well - organized and compact defense, their efficiency in creating scoring opportunities is relatively mediocre. Levante adheres to a pragmatic competition concept of flexible counter - attacking. They actively give up inefficient ball - control in advanced positions, instead, they first tighten up their defense in the back - field, focusing o
      AH
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    • gollazo bets
      gollazo bets
      Osasuna has long been a mid - table team in La Liga. Their tactical style is tough and practical, focusing on high - intensity physical confrontation and team defense. The players have a unified tactical execution ability, and their performance on the field is stable with little fluctuation. In recent matches, Osasuna has achieved a mediocre record, with balanced offensive and defensive data. On the defensive end, their positioning and coordinated defense systems are well - developed, and their ability to control goals conceded is above the league average. On the offensive end, they play at a slow pace, aiming for stability and gradually seeking scoring opportunities. At home, Osasuna is well - adapted to the high - intensity confrontation rhythm. Their midfielders are fierce in tackles and are good at disrupting the opponent's passing and ball - control system through physical impact. The team shows great tenacity in defense at home and has an outstanding ability to withstand pressure
      AH
      SPA D1 Osasuna - Levante
    More Tips
    • Both Kuruvchi Kokon and Bukhara have shown sub - par offensive performances recently. Their offensive conversion rates are lower than the league average, with Kuruvchi at 11.3% and Bukhara at 9.8%. The combined xG value is only 2.1, which clearly indicates inefficiency in the attacking third. In terms of key pass success rates, Kuruvchi stands at 68% while Bukhara is at 65%. The value of forward passes is 0.43 for Kuruvchi and 0.39 for Bukhara, suggesting a marginal difference between the two teams. However, both teams suffer from a lack of midfield control. Their counter - attack speed is sluggish, with an average half - time sprint distance of only 9.2 km and a high - intensity running proportion of less than 15%. I believe that only with careful analysis and sincere recommendations can we achieve long - term success in this field. The defensive statistics of this match highlight its intensity. Kuruvchi Kokan averages 14.2 tackles per game, ranking third in the league, and Bokhtar ha
      O/U
      UZB D1 Kuruvchi Kokand Qoqon - Buxoro FK
    • Both Botoșani and FK Miercurea Ciuc have relatively low offensive efficiency in the league. Their offensive conversion rates this season are only 11.2% and 9.8% respectively, far below the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, neither team has exceeded the 65% mark. Their Passing Attack Value (PA.V) in the front - field is only 0.32 and 0.28 respectively, indicating a lack of ability to create substantial threats. In midfield control, there is an obvious balance. The difference in the average number of times of regaining the ball per game (SPR) between the two teams is within 5 times. Their Conversion Possession Index (CPI) is both below 0.45, showing a lack of momentum for quick offense - defense transitions. Running data reveals a lack of high - intensity confrontation. The total average high - intensity running distance (HID) per game of both teams is less than 90 kilometers, 12% lower than the league average. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Botosani - FK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
    • Bologna has an average offensive conversion rate of 11.2% this season, lower than Lazio's 14.4%. However, Lazio's xG value of 1.8 times per game suggests that its offensive efficiency might be overestimated. In terms of key passing success rates, Bologna and Lazio have rates of 72.3% and 76.1% respectively. Lazio's front - court passing value of 0.35 is higher than Bologna's 0.28, but there is a significant difference in conversion rates. Bologna's midfield control is evident as it regains the ball 17.3 times per game on average, 2.8 more times than Lazio. Its transition attack speed is 1.4 seconds per possession, better than Lazio's 1.8 seconds. The difference in the average high - intensity sprint distance between the two teams is only 18 meters. But Bologna's total running distance of 112 km outnumbers Lazio's 99 km. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can there be long - term development. Bologna excels in the defensive department, averaging 13.6 interceptions and
      O/U
      ITA D1 Bologna - Lazio
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.