APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Henry LandWon 10/10Follow100%Win Rate +80.4%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Mbah_tipsterFollow91.7%Win Rate +59.9%ROI 12Tips 1.79Avg Odds -
3
Ingram⚪🔴Won 14/16Follow84%Win Rate +47.1%ROI 27Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
4
PhilegrayWon 8/8Follow80%Win Rate +31.6%ROI 30Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
5
OssOssOssWon 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +41%ROI 26Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
mata jalyWon 16/20Follow80%Win Rate +31%ROI 25Tips 1.75Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ForFun.exeFulham is a typical mid - table team in the Premier League. Their overall strength, players' individual abilities, and squad depth have remained stable. The team's goal is to secure their Premier League status first and then strive for a higher ranking. In the previous season, Fulham finished 11th in the league. On the other hand, Chelsea had a disappointing performance last season, dropping to the 10th place in the league, which was one of their worst results in recent years. However, in terms of squad depth and players' individual capabilities, Chelsea still ranks among the upper - middle tier in the Premier League. Chelsea's new head coach, Xavi Alonso, adheres to the modern football philosophy of ball - control and high - pressing. During the summer transfer window, the team significantly upgraded its squad through a series of high - profile signings. However, the team still faces some defensive issues. The suspension of key midfielder, Wesley Fofana, and the lack of cohesion in thO/U
ENG PR
Fulham
2-3 Chelsea
-
Okiem MadridistyIn this Premier League encounter, the offensive efficiency between Fulham and Chelsea shows a distinct contrast. Fulham has an offensive conversion rate of only 12% this season, which is lower than the Premier League average. Chelsea, on the other hand, has a 15% conversion rate, but its average expected goals (xG) value of 1.4 lacks substance. When facing high - intensity defense, Chelsea is likely to get stuck in an inefficient cycle. In terms of passing efficiency, Fulham's key passing success rate is 78%, better than Chelsea's 72%. However, the key coefficient of 0.85 for its forward - field passing value indicates that it creates limited threats. Chelsea has an advantage in midfield control. With an average ball - possession rate of 62% and 120 passes per game, it only manages 9 counter - attacks, failing to effectively increase the tempo of the game. Both teams cover a running distance of over 110 kilometers, but the high - intensity sprints (143 times for Fulham and 137 times foO/UENG PR
Fulham
2-3 Chelsea
-
VIP100%Fulham finished 11th in the league last season. This summer, the team made personnel changes, and the new coach started to restructure the tactical system, commonly using the 4-2-3-1 formation. The Craven Cottage Stadium is long and narrow, which suits the team's style of pressing on the spot and rapid attack-defense transitions. The double defensive midfielders are responsible for intercepting and disrupting the opponent's passing lines. They don't just defend passively. After winning the ball, they quickly send through balls, relying on the wingers' high-speed runs to break behind the opponent's defense. Set-pieces are also an important scoring method. Chelsea's tactical framework this season is based on the 3-4-2-1 formation. In the attacking phase, the wing-backs push forward significantly to widen the flanks. The midfielders advance through continuous short passes, and several flexible players in the frontcourt create chances by making runs and interceptions. The overall offensiveO/UENG PR
Fulham
2-3 Chelsea
ENG PR
More Tips
-
Looking at the historical head - to - head data between Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps, there's a clear contrast in offensive and defensive transitions. In the last five years of their official encounters, when Chicago Fire played at home, Vancouver Whitecaps had a significant edge in corner kicks. In four meetings, the corner - kick differences were all negative for Chicago Fire (-5, -0, -2, -5). This shows that Vancouver Whitecaps were more proactive and dominant in set - piece situations. For instance, in a game where Chicago Fire lost 0 - 1 at home, Vancouver Whitecaps led by 5 corner kicks. In a 1 - 1 draw, the Whitecaps had a 2 - corner - kick advantage. These results indirectly point out potential weaknesses in Chicago Fire's home - defense, especially in aerial duels and defending on the flanks. Vancouver Whitecaps' corner - kick data shows an opposite trend when playing away. In their last four away games, the corner - kick differences were all negative (-6, -4, -6, -3).AH
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X