APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> amvn>

    AC Horsens VS Viborg

    Denmark Superliga
    Analysis More Tips
    AC Horsens
    AC Horsens 2
    3 Viborg
    Viborg
    I'm a professional analyst with a long - term and stable performance in providing quality information. I've tailored a long - term, high - quality product for my followers. Horsens shows clear advantages in multiple aspects compared to Viborg. In terms of offensive conversion, Horsens' offensive end conversion rate is 18.3%, better than Viborg's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 against 0.52 further highlights Horsens' superiority in attack. When it comes to key passing, Horsens has a success rate of 42%, while Viborg only manages 31%. The value of forward passes, 1.21 to 0.89, indicates that Horsens' passing in the front field is more efficient. In midfield control, Horsens holds a 61% possession rate, leaving Viborg with only 39%. The transition speed of 1.8 seconds for Horsens against 2.4 seconds for Viborg shows that Horsens has a stronger ability to control the game. Regarding physical performance, the total team running distance of Horsens is 118.3 km, higher than Viborg's 109.6 km. And the number of high - intensity sprints is 17 for Horsens and 12 for Viborg, suggesting that Horsens has better physical reserves. On the defensive side, although Viborg has 11 tackles, it has only 6 interceptions and 9 clearances, showing relatively unstable defensive statistics.
    Further Reading
    • Itz Crossbow
      Itz Crossbow
      Horsens has shown significant fluctuations in the Danish Superliga. Currently, they sit sixth on the league table. After five games, they have a record of 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses, with a total of 6 goals scored and 7 conceded, resulting in a goal difference of -1. When playing at home, the team has a record of 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss in 3 games. They've scored 3 goals and conceded 4, with a goal difference of -1 and a win - rate of 33.3%. This indicates that they haven't fully capitalized on their home - field advantage. Notably, Horsens have maintained a stable performance in the last six rounds, with 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. They've contributed 6 goals on the offensive end but conceded 7 on the defensive end, suggesting that they need to improve the balance between attack and defense. In contrast, Viborg is second in the league with 10 points. In their five games, they have 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, scoring 7 goals and conceding only 2. Their goal difference is 5, and t
      AH
      DEN SASL AC Horsens 2-3 Viborg
    • Tyson I Malik - Go Bears Forever
      Tyson I Malik - Go Bears Forever Won 11/16
      Horsens, currently sitting in 6th place, has a largely intact starting lineup. Most of the injuries and suspensions are among the substitutes. There are absences in the rotational defenders and substitute midfielders, and a few attacking players are doubtful. The combat effectiveness of the on - field starters isn't significantly affected. The main loss is the depth of the substitutes. In the second half, the options for rotation and adjustment are limited. When players are exhausted from high physical exertion, there won't be enough backup support. Viborg, ranked 2nd, has some rotational defenders out due to injuries or suspensions. A few midfielders are also doubtful, while the front - line starters are mostly in good condition. The starting lineup framework is complete and usable, but the defensive bench strength is weak. When playing away, if there are injuries or accumulated yellow cards, there will be a significant drop in the strength of the substitute defenders. However, with a
      O/U
      DEN SASL AC Horsens 2-3 Viborg
    • Ekaya
      Ekaya
      Horsens has shown inconsistent performance in the Danish Superliga recently, with a record of 2 wins, 2 losses, and 1 draw in their last five official matches. In terms of specific results, they won 2-1 at home against Lyngby and 2-1 away at Odense. However, they also suffered a 0-2 home defeat to Brøndby and a 1-2 away loss to Midtjylland. They drew 1-1 at home against North Zealand. Data reveals significant weaknesses in the team's offensive and defensive efficiency. Their corner - kick control is particularly poor. For instance, in the game against North Zealand, they only managed to get 4 corner kicks while their opponents had 13, indicating the fragility of their defense in set - piece situations. Moreover, in the last five official matches, Horsens scored 4 goals and conceded 7. Both the efficiency of their offensive end and the stability of their defense need improvement. Viborg has shown a more balanced competitive state. In the past five official matches, they achieved 3 wins
      O/U
      DEN SASL AC Horsens 2-3 Viborg
    More Tips
    • I'm a long - standing and reliable source of football information, offering a high - quality long - term product tailored for dedicated fans. In the offensive aspect, Levante has an edge over Real Betis. Levante's offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, better than Betis's 15.2%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 for Levante compared to 0.61 for Betis shows that Levante has a stronger offensive conversion ability. When it comes to key passing, Levante also dominates. Its key passing success rate is 62%, while Betis only manages 54%. The value of forward passes, with Levante at 1.23 and Betis at 0.97, indicates a more efficient offensive organization by Levante. In midfield control, Levante holds a 68% possession rate and a conversion speed of 45 times per minute, effectively suppressing Betis. In terms of physical performance, Levante runs a total distance of 112 km, more than Betis's 107 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for Levante and 15 for Betis, reflecting Levante's phy
      AH
      SPA D1 Levante - Real Betis
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. I've tailored a long - term, top - notch product for my valued followers. In terms of the current season, Dortmund has shown superiority in multiple aspects compared to Hamburg. In the attacking front, Dortmund has a passing value of 12.7 times per 90 minutes, significantly higher than Hamburg's 9.3 times. The key passing success rate of Dortmund stands at 18.2%, while Hamburg's is only 12.4%. When it comes to offensive conversion, Dortmund's rate is 14.8%, outperforming Hamburg's 11.2%. The expected goals (xG) value also favors Dortmund, with 0.78 against 0.51 for Hamburg. In midfield control, Dortmund is more dominant. They average 11.4 interceptions per game, 3.2 more than Hamburg. Their high - intensity sprints reach 17.6 times per 90 minutes, better than Hamburg's 14.1 times. On the defensive side, although Hamburg manages 15.3 clearances per 90 minutes, Dortmund has
      O/U
      GER D1 Borussia Dortmund - Hamburger SV
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable performance in providing quality information. I've tailored a long - term, high - quality product for my valued followers. Monza shows a clear edge in multiple aspects. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 18.6%, superior to Udinese's 12.3%. The xG value of 1.82 compared to 1.15 indicates a more efficient attack. In key passes, Monza's success rate reaches 41%, leading Udinese's 35%. The value of forward passes is 12.7 for Monza, more threatening than Udinese's 9.2. In midfield, Monza controls the ball 58% of the time, while Udinese has only 42%. The average transition speed of Monza is 1.2 seconds, faster than Udinese's 1.6 seconds. The total running distance of Monza's team is 112.3 km, 2.8 km more than their opponents. They also have an advantage in high - intensity sprints, with 47 compared to Udinese's 32. On the defensive end, Monza leads in tackles (15 vs 10), interceptions (18 vs 13), and clearances
      AH
      ITA D1 Monza - Udinese
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.