APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> u cant ans>

    Amedspor VS Trabzonspor

    Turkey Super Lig
    Analysis More Tips
    Amedspor
    Amedspor
    Trabzonspor
    Trabzonspor
    Further Reading
    • Bella Rose
      Bella Rose
      The recent form of both teams has been up and down. Alanyaspor has won 4, drawn 3, and lost 3 in their last 10 games. Their defense has been out - of - sync, with plenty of holes. On the other hand, Trabzonspor has won 3, drawn 1, and lost 6 recently. Their form has been on a significant decline. Although Trabzonspor has had some good moments, their overall performance in matches is not as good as Alanyaspor. Trabzonspor's forwards have been under - performing. Both teams will go all out. In terms of the game situation, Trabzonspor is slightly behind Alanyaspor. Alanyaspor's defense is also solid, and they can almost score in every game, showing good attacking ability. Moreover, two of Alanyaspor's foreign players have been outstanding, stabilizing the situation for the team in crucial moments. Given the fluctuating forms of the two teams, it's hard to say which team will seize the initiative in this game. Amede has been in good form recently, winning 4, drawing 3, and losing 3 in thei
      O/U
      TUR D1 Amedspor - Trabzonspor
    • TopG Vikash
      TopG Vikash
      Amid the intense competition in the Turkish Super League, Amidat has demonstrated remarkable strength at home. In the previous round, they achieved a resounding 3-0 victory over Erzurumspor. Despite a goalless first - half and an equal 4-4 corner count, their attacking and defensive efficiency in the second half was outstanding. Looking at their recent form, Amidat has been a force to be reckoned with at home. They average 2.5 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded per home game. They've had convincing 2-0 wins over Dohuk in home matches. However, their performance on the road has been less consistent, as shown by a 0-2 loss to Batamida in an away game, indicating some volatility when playing outside their home ground. In terms of corner control, Amidat maintains an average ratio of 5.3-4.7 at home. In a Turkish First League game, they drew 1-1 with Bodrumspor, and the 12-7 corner count highlighted their tactical execution. On the other hand, Trabzonspor had a home win in the Turkish Supe
      AH
      TUR D1 Amedspor - Trabzonspor
    • Salvador González Valero
      Salvador González Valero
      The recent form of the two teams shows a clear disparity. Amed has had a mixed performance in their last six official matches, recording two wins, one draw, and three losses. They've scored 7 goals and conceded 9, with a win - rate of 33%. In their last league game, they lost 0 - 1 away from home, and their offensive efficiency has declined lately. At home, in the last six matches, they have 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 6 goals and conceding 7, resulting in an unbeaten home - rate of 67%. On the other hand, Trabzonspor has been in excellent form. They've maintained an unbeaten streak of five wins and one draw in the last six official matches, scoring 17 goals and conceding only 4, a remarkable win - rate of 83%. In their previous league game, they shut out their opponents 2 - 0 at home, with outstanding performances in both attack and defense. Away from home, they've won 4, drawn 1, and lost 1 in the last six matches, scoring 12 goals and conceding 5, with an impressive away
      O/U
      TUR D1 Amedspor - Trabzonspor
    More Tips
    • I've been meticulously researching football matches and here is my in - depth analysis. In this Egyptian Premier League encounter, Petreem shows greater efficiency in the offensive end. Their conversion rate of offensive opportunities is 12% higher than that of National Bank Club, and their xG value stands at 1.8 compared to 1.2, which means they pose a greater threat. In terms of key passes, Petreem has a success rate of 72%, outperforming National Bank Club's 58%. The value of their forward passes is also 0.33 higher. When it comes to midfield control, Petreem averages 8.2 tackles per game, with a 15% increase in transition speed. The whole team runs an average of 11.3 kilometers, with 14 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. Overall, Petreem seems to have an edge in various aspects of the game. The National Bank Club has shown weaknesses in its defensive statistics. Their average of 5.1 clearances per game is lower than their opponents' 7.3, and their in
      AH
      EGY D1 Asyut Petroleum - NBE SC
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this match. In this game, Gnistan has significant advantages over TPS Turku. In terms of offensive conversion, Gnistan's attacking end conversion rate is 12% higher than TPS, and its xG efficiency leads by 0.35. For TPS, its key passing success rate is only 48%, 15 percentage points behind Gnistan. The value of its forward - field passes is also 18% lower. In midfield control, Gnistan has an average of 12 interceptions per game. Its transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster than TPS, and the whole team runs 3.2 kilometers more. The number of high - intensity sprints of Gnistan leads by 27 times. On the defensive end, Gnistan has 18 tackles and 11 clearances, better than TPS's 14 tackles and 8 clearances. In the attacking end, Gnistan has a stronger ability to seize opportunities, with a shot - on - target rate 10% higher than TPS. According to xG data, Gnistan's expected goals are 1.8, while TPS only has 1.1. Overall, Gnistan shows a better performanc
      AH
      FIN D1 Gnistan Helsinki - TPS Turku
    • I specialize in match analysis and offer top - notch selections. In this FNL encounter, Elvis shows significant advantages over Helsinki. Offensively, Elvis has a 12% higher conversion rate in finishing attacks compared to Helsinki. Their xG efficiency leads by 0.3. The value of their forward passes is 1.8 higher than that of Helsinki, and the success rate of their key passes is 15% better. In the midfield, Elvis controls the game with a 58% possession rate. Their transition speed is 0.8 seconds faster than Helsinki. They also cover 8.2 more kilometers in total running distance and have 32 more high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, Elvis has 5 more tackles than Helsinki. Their interception efficiency is 20% higher, although they have 3 fewer clearances. All these factors suggest that Elvis may have a better chance in this game. Elvis has shown a strong edge in various aspects of the game. In terms of ball - possession, Elvis dominated with a 57% overall possession rate, which
      AH
      FIN D1 Ilves Tampere - HJK Helsinki
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.