Parma vs Cremonese Tips and Predictions AH LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍

Coppa Italia

Analysis More Tips

Parma

Cremonese

Further Reading

Eldy Febriansyah

Palma's home form this season has been far from impressive. Their win rate at home stands at just 28.5%, with a draw rate of the same percentage and a loss rate as high as 42.8%. In seven home games, they've only scored 7 goals while conceding 8, averaging 1.0 goal per game and 1.1 goals conceded per game, indicating low offensive and defensive efficiency. Looking at the overall data across all competitions, Palma has a win rate of 20%, averaging 0.7 goals per game. They've conceded 13 goals, with a goal difference of -6, showing both a lack of firepower in attack and defensive vulnerabilities. Moreover, they average 3.4 corner kicks per game and 1 yellow card per game. This reflects the challenges the team is facing in converting attacks into goals and maintaining discipline on the pitch. As they prepare to host Cremona, Palma will need to address these issues if they hope to secure a positive result. Cremonese has demonstrated a more stable away - game competitiveness. Their away - w

AH
ITA Cup Parma - Cremonese
u cant ans

I've been doing in - depth research on football matches and here's my in - depth analysis of the game between Parma and Cremonese. Parma shows clear superiority in multiple aspects. The overall offensive conversion rate of Parma stands at 28%, which is significantly higher than Cremonese's 19%. The xG value of 1.8 for Parma compared to 1.1 of Cremonese also reflects its offensive efficiency edge. In terms of passing, the success rate of key passes for Parma is 62%, far exceeding Cremonese's 45%. The value of forward passes reaches 14.3 times per 90 minutes. In the midfield, Parma controls the ball 58% of the time, and the number of fast - paced ball transitions is 17 times per 90 minutes, leading the way in this statistic. When it comes to physical fitness, the total running distance of Parma's team is 112.4 kilometers, with 43 high - intensity sprints. This indicates that Parma has better physical reserves. Overall, Parma has a strong advantage in this game based on these factors. Cre

AH
ITA Cup Parma - Cremonese
Iqbal ahmad

I have a professional team and conduct in - depth analysis of selected matches daily. In this football match, Parma shows significant advantages in multiple aspects compared to Cremonese. In terms of offensive conversion, Parma's offensive end conversion rate is 18.3%, much better than Cremonese's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.21 for Parma against 0.89 for Cremonese clearly reflects Parma's superiority in offensive efficiency. When it comes to passing, Parma's key passing success rate is 61%, while Cremonese's is only 49%. The value of front - field passes of 14.2 for Parma against 9.6 for Cremonese indicates that Parma has better control in the midfield. In terms of physical performance, Parma's total running distance in the whole game is 118 km, with 23 high - intensity sprints, while Cremonese only has 19. On the defensive end, Parma has 14 tackles, 9 interceptions and 6 clearances, which are superior to Cremonese's 9.4 and 3. In terms of offensive opportunities, Parma's offensive c

O/U
ITA Cup Parma - Cremonese

More Tips

KR Reykjavík is in excellent form, boasting a remarkable attacking efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 24%, well above the league average of 18%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 also significantly outshines Vikingur's 15% and 0.9. The team has a highly - effective passing system. The success rate of key passes reaches 78%, and the passing value in the front - field area is 0.85. This allows them to consistently create high - quality goal - scoring opportunities. In terms of midfield control, KR Reykjavík is outstanding. They maintain a 62% possession rate and have an average transition speed of 8.4 seconds, enabling a quick connection between defense and offense. The players' running statistics are also impressive. They cover an average of 118 km per game and make 22 high - intensity sprints. These efforts support a high - pressure game and a fast counter - attack rhythm, laying a solid foundation for high - scoring performances. This game is definitely one not to be miss

O/U
ICE PR KR Reykjavik - Vikingur Reykjavik
Sheffield United's recent offensive performance has been lackluster. Their offensive conversion rate stands at a mere 15%, with an xG efficiency of 0.9. In contrast, Bolton shows a much stronger finishing ability. Their offensive conversion rate is 24%, and the xG efficiency reaches 1.3. In passing statistics, Bolton also outshines Sheffield United. Bolton's successful key - pass rate is 85%, and the value of their forward passes is 0.8, while Sheffield United only manages 70% and 0.5 respectively. When it comes to midfield control, Bolton dominates the game's rhythm. They hold a 58% ball - possession rate and have a transition speed of 3.2 seconds. Running data further highlights Bolton's superiority. The whole Bolton team runs 118 km and makes 120 high - intensity sprints, while Sheffield United only runs 110 km and makes 95 high - intensity sprints. In conclusion, from a data perspective, Bolton has more advantages in this game and is more likely to secure a victory. Bolton has show

AH
ENG LCH Sheffield United - Bolton Wanderers
The recent form of West Ham United has been quite impressive, and this game against Wolverhampton Wanderers shows great promise. Let's take a look at the insights from the EFL Championship data. West Ham United's offensive efficiency is remarkable. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 28%, while Wolverhampton Wanderers only have 18%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 indicates that they are performing beyond expectations. In terms of passing, the success rate of key passes for West Ham United is 87%, compared to 80% of Wolverhampton Wanderers. This means their forward passes are of high value, creating more threatening opportunities. In the midfield, West Ham United has a control rate of 62%. The average transition speed is 8 seconds, which allows them to launch quick counter - attacks and put pressure on the opponent's rhythm. In terms of physical performance, the whole team runs a total of 118 km, with 150 high - intensity sprints, while Wolverhampton Wanderers only have 130. This physi

AH
ENG LCH West Ham United - Wolves

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Parma VS Cremonese