Sassuolo vs Frosinone Tips and Predictions AH Big Strongbull

Coppa Italia

Analysis More Tips

Sassuolo

Frosinone

Further Reading

JJ BEDDINGS

Sassuolo shows clear advantages over Frosinone in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion, Sassuolo's conversion rate stands at 18.3%, better than Frosinone's 14.1%. The xG efficiency is 0.72 for Sassuolo, while Frosinone only has 0.55. Regarding passing, Sassuolo's key - pass success rate is 62%, leading Frosinone's 49%. The value of forward passes is 12.8 for Sassuolo, compared to 9.3 for Frosinone. In midfield control, Sassuolo dominates with a 61% possession rate, leaving Frosinone with only 39%. The transition speed of Sassuolo is 1.2 seconds, which is faster than Frosinone's 1.8 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Sassuolo runs 118 km in the whole - field, with 42 high - intensity sprints. Frosinone runs 109 km and has 31 high - intensity sprints. Defensively, Frosinone has 15 tackles but only 8 interceptions, and its 12 clearances are fewer than Sassuolo's 18. In the offensive end, Sassuolo creates 12 scoring opportunities, with a conversion rate of 24%, higher

O/U
ITA Cup Sassuolo 1-1 Frosinone
EvilSpirit

Sassuolo has recently shown a combination of high - efficiency in attack and volatility in defense. In the Italian Cup, the team thrashed Cesena 3 - 0. They were 2 - 0 up at half - time and had 4 - 5 corner kicks, which verified their offensive efficiency. However, their performance in friendlies has been rather inconsistent. They lost 3 - 2 to Augsburg. At half - time, the score was 2 - 2, and the 7 - 11 corner - kick disadvantage reflected defensive flaws. They also suffered a 1 - 4 defeat away to Celta. They were 0 - 1 down at half - time and had only 2 - 7 corner kicks, further exposing the instability of their defense. In Serie A, they defeated Torino 2 - 1. They were level 1 - 1 at half - time with 4 - 3 corner kicks, indicating their competitiveness in crucial games. In a friendly, they beat Padova 4 - 1. They led 2 - 1 at half - time and had 4 - 4 corner kicks, which showed their continuous offensive firepower. Frosinone has shown a strong attacking performance in cup competiti

AH
ITA Cup Sassuolo 1-1 Frosinone
gollazo bets

Sassuolo has had a dismal start to the new season. In their last five official matches, they've only managed 1 win, 1 draw, and 3 losses, with a win rate of less than 20%. They're currently sitting at a low position in the standings, and the imbalance between offense and defense is quite evident. Although their average number of goals per game seems decent, their finishing efficiency is extremely poor. They often have a high number of shots but fail to convert them into goals. Moreover, their defense has seen individual errors in multiple consecutive games, with many gaps in man - to - man defense. Sassuolo performs better at home than away. In their last four home games, they've achieved 2 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, with a relatively stable points - getting rate at home. Their tactical approach focuses on wing - driven attacks. They rely on wingers Volpato and Lauriente to create chances through dribbling and breaking through the opponent's defense. As for Frosinone, a comprehensive an

AH
ITA Cup Sassuolo 1-1 Frosinone

More Tips

Palermo has shown remarkable strength at home this season. The team's home - win rate is as high as 66.6%, which is significantly higher than their overall win rate of 60%, highlighting their prominent home - field advantage. In home games, Palermo's offensive and defensive efficiency far exceeds the league average. They score an average of 3.5 goals per game while conceding only 3 goals. Their home - game tactics are well - executed. The average number of corner kicks per game is 4.5, leading most teams in the league and creating ample offensive opportunities. On the defensive end, they maintain excellent discipline, with an average of only 0.9 yellow cards per game, indicating the players' calm tactical execution on the pitch. Throughout the season, they've scored 26 goals, conceded 8, and have a goal difference of 18, averaging 2.6 goals per game. Mantova also has a decent win rate of 80% when playing away. However, their offensive efficiency is relatively low, with an average of 2

AH
ITA Cup Palermo - Mantova
Moscow Dynamo has a significant edge in home encounters against Grozny Terek, boasting an unbeaten record of 2 wins and 1 draw in the past three home games. They had an impressive 4 - 2 home victory, a dominant 2 - 0 win, and a 2 - 2 draw. With an average of 3.0 goals per game, their attacking firepower is evident. However, Grozny Terek has shown great resilience in away games. They managed a 2 - 1 away win against Moscow Dynamo and even achieved a comprehensive 0 - 3 victory on the road. This shows that their away - game offensive system is well - developed. Considering these factors, Moscow Dynamo has a strong home - field advantage and potent attack, but Grozny Terek's away - game performance cannot be underestimated, making this a highly competitive match. Moscow Dynamo has a remarkable home - field attacking efficiency when looking at the offensive and defensive data. However, their away - game defensive performance is rather poor. In their last two away games, they conceded a tot

AH
RUS Cup Dynamo Moscow - Terek Grozny
Mjallby has had a stable home record this season, with a win rate of 60%. In recent home games, they've scored an average of 1.4 goals per game, with 7 goals scored, 4 conceded, and a goal difference of +3. Their defense has been solid, conceding an average of 0.8 goals per game. Overall, their offensive and defensive efficiency ranks in the middle of the league. On the other hand, Örgryte has shown strong competitiveness away from home. Their away win - rate stands at a high 66.6%. They average 2.0 goals per game on the road. In recent away matches, they've scored 6 goals and conceded 4, with a goal difference of +2. Their offensive firepower is significantly stronger than Mjallby's home average of 1.4 goals. The data comparison reveals a clear gap in offensive efficiency. Örgryte's away offensive efficiency (2.0 goals per game) is much higher than Mjallby's home performance (1.4 goals). Mjallby's home defensive solidity (0.8 goals conceded per game) could be the key variable in thi

AH
SWE D1 Mjallby AIF - Djurgardens

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Sassuolo VS Frosinone