APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> amvn>

    Sandefjord VS Viking

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Sandefjord
    Sandefjord 1
    1 Viking
    Viking
    I'm a well - known expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for dedicated fans. When comparing Sandefjord and Viking, Sandefjord shows clear advantages. In terms of offensive conversion, Sandefjord's offensive end conversion rate stands at 18%, outperforming Viking's 12%. The xG efficiency of 1.2 for Sandefjord against 0.8 for Viking further highlights its offensive superiority. Regarding the passing game, Sandefjord has an edge. Its key pass success rate is 65% compared to Viking's 55%. The value of forward passes is 2.1 for Sandefjord and 1.4 for Viking, indicating that Sandefjord poses a greater threat in the build - up play. In the midfield, Sandefjord dominates. It holds a 58% ball - possession rate while Viking only has 42%. The transition speed of 1.8 seconds for Sandefjord is much quicker than Viking's 2.3 seconds, allowing it to control the game rhythm more effectively. In terms of physical performance, Sandefjord runs a total distance of 112 km, more than Viking's 108 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 15 for Sandefjord and 10 for Viking, suggesting that Sandefjord has a better physical reserve.
    Further Reading
    • Ben Way
      Ben Way Won 3/4
      In their recent head - to - head, Viking defeated Sandefjord 2 - 1 at home, and this result adds a significant element of suspense to their upcoming encounter. Sandefjord has shown inconsistent form in the league lately. In their last five league games, they've managed just 1 win, 2 draws, and 2 losses. Their performance has been a mixed bag. They held Brann to a 0 - 0 draw at home, and had a 2 - 1 away win against Sarpsborg. However, they also suffered defeats, losing 0 - 1 at home to KFUM Oslo and away to Fredrikstad, and endured a heavy 0 - 3 home loss to Bodø/Glimt. Offensively, Sandefjord has been lackluster, averaging only 0.8 goals per game. Defensively, they have issues as well. The 0 - 3 home defeat to Bodø/Glimt clearly exposed the weaknesses in their defensive line, with a high number of goals conceded in several games. This inconsistent form and defensive frailties will likely pose challenges for Sandefjord in their upcoming match against Viking.
      O/U
      NOR D1 Sandefjord 1-1 Viking
    • TopG Vikash
      TopG Vikash
      The two teams' recent home and away performances are in stark contrast. Sandefjord has a dismal home record this season with a win rate of 0%. They've only managed 6 draws and 4 losses in home games, averaging just 0.6 goals per game while conceding a high 1.17 goals per game. Their goal difference stands at -4, indicating a serious imbalance between attack and defense. The team has numerous defensive flaws, getting an average of 2 yellow cards per game and conceding 7 goals in home games, which shows a lack of organization in the defense and poor tactical execution. On the other hand, Viking is in strong form away from home. They have a win rate of up to 50% in away matches, scoring 12 goals and conceding only 7, with a goal difference of +5. Their average of 2.0 goals per game shows that their attacking and defensive efficiency far exceeds that of the home team. The away team averages 7.3 corner - kicks per game, with a tactical style that focuses on ball control and quick counter -
      AH
      NOR D1 Sandefjord 1-1 Viking
    • RMFrance
      RMFrance
      I've had 8 successful predictions out of 9. I only recommend one game daily. Let's look at the situation. Sandefjord has a poor overall record. Their season win - rate is only 20%, while the loss - rate reaches as high as 50%. They average 2.2 goals per game but also concede an average of 1.3 goals per game, which shows obvious weaknesses in their defense. What's more concerning is their away - game performance. They've only scored 3 goals, conceded 7, with a goal difference of - 4 and an average of 0.6 goals per game, indicating seriously insufficient offensive and defensive efficiency on the road. On the other hand, Viking, as the visiting team, has strong overall strength. Their win - rate is 70% and the loss - rate is just 10%. They average 2.1 goals per game and concede 1.1 on average. Their away - game statistics are also impressive. They've scored 12 goals, conceded 7, with a goal difference of + 5 and an average of 2 goals per game, showing a strong ability to adapt to away gam
      AH
      NOR D1 Sandefjord 1-1 Viking
    More Tips
    • I'm a professional analyst with access to industry - insider information, aiming to provide sharp insights. Lens has been in good form recently. Their average shot - on - target rate is 18.3%, higher than Lorient's 14.1%. In terms of xG efficiency, Lens holds an edge with 1.21 compared to Lorient's 0.98. Lorient has a better key - passing success rate of 62% than Lens' 55%. However, their negative offensive passing value difference of - 0.8 indicates problems with offensive organization. Lens' midfield is very active. They make an average of 11.2 interceptions per game, 2.4 more than Lorient. Also, their transition speed is faster, at an average of 1.8 seconds per transition. Although the running distances of the two teams are similar, Lens has a 15% higher number of high - intensity sprints, suggesting better physical reserves. Lorient makes an average of 5.3 clearances per game, but Lens shows more defensive tenacity with a 71% tackle success rate. In attack, Lens creates 3.2 excelle
      O/U
      FRA D1 Lens - Lorient
    • I'm a well - established expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights for dedicated fans. In terms of offensive efficiency, Inter Milan has a significant edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 23%, outperforming Napoli's 18%. The xG values of 1.8 to 1.2 clearly highlight Inter's attacking superiority. When it comes to passing, Inter Milan's key pass success rate is 62%, higher than Napoli's 55%. The value of their front - field passes reaches 14.3 times per 90 minutes. Defensively, Inter's midfielders are more active. They have a better record in interceptions, with 19 compared to Napoli's 14. Moreover, their transition speed is quicker, at 1.2 seconds per possession, while Napoli takes 1.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the whole Inter team runs 118 km, 2.4 km more than Napoli. Their high - intensity sprint count is also higher, 58 to 43, which shows their better physical reserve. All these factors suggest that Inter Milan is in a stro
      AH
      ITA D1 Inter Milan - Napoli
    • I'm a professional analyst, offering long - term and high - quality insights. When comparing the offensive efficiency between Schalke 04 and Bayern Munich, the home team, Schalke 04, has an offensive finishing conversion rate of 12.3%, better than the away team Bayern Munich's 9.8%. However, Bayern Munich's xG efficiency (1.8) is significantly higher than Schalke's (0.9). In passing statistics, Bayern Munich leads with a key passing success rate of 67% compared to Schalke's 52%. The value of their forward passes is 14.2, superior to Schalke's 9.4. In midfield control, Bayern Munich averages 11.4 tackles and 8.6 interceptions per game. Their running distance of 112.3 kilometers and 18 high - intensity sprints are both higher than Schalke's. On the defensive end, Bayern Munich has 15 clearances and 12 interceptions, while Schalke has 9 clearances and 7 interceptions.
      O/U
      GER D1 Schalke 04 - Bayern Munchen
    Nowgoal26.com
    Telegram Facebook X
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.